Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · Free trade packed bad for...
. . . .

Free trade packed bad for Michigan agriculture

Curtis W. Ellis & Marilyn Momber - June 27th, 2011
Free trade pacts bad for Michigan agriculture
By Curtis W. Ellis & Marilynn Momber
Pending free trade agreements with Korea, Colombia and Panama are bad for
Michigan farmers and must be rejected if we are to preserve our way of
All three trade treaties are based on NAFTA-style policies which have
displaced American farmers while sending jobs that support Michigan’s
rural communities offshore. In fact, our leading export is jobs even as we
reward companies that outsource jobs. Since NAFTA took effect, the United
States has lost 300,000 farms and millions of jobs.
Major commodity groups and agribusiness organizations have been beating
the drum for passage of these free trade agreements (FTAs). They make
dubious claims that there will be massive export gains for farm products
as a result of these FTAs.
The American Farm Bureau Federation Farm has released a study that
estimates the Korea FTA would result in $1.65 billion in additional U.S.
agricultural sales - but the Farm Bureau’s figures only look at gross
exports while never including expanded imports. Net trade is what
The Farm Bureau’s fuzzy math also arbitrarily assumes an automatic 10%
increase (a figure pulled out of thin air) for U.S. market share in Korea
for every American agricultural sector, despite a finding from the U.S.
International Trade Commission (USITC) that says corn, soybeans and wheat
would be net losers, and rice is not even covered in the Korea FTA. The
USITC projects many American agricultural sectors would face a worsening
trade balance were the free trade agreement to be implemented. This is a
very serious manipulation.
Loopholes in the FTAs rules-of-origin promote “leakage,” so countries such
as China and Vietnam are allowed to gain at our expense.
Since only 35% of a product’s value must be added in Korea, there is a
major trans-shipment risk from China in processed foods. Chinese apples
have already decimated the Michigan apple industry and we should not be
allowing food processed in the U.S. or Korea but grown elsewhere to get
free trade benefits such as the duty-free access provided by the deal.
Michigan cattle and beef producers will also be harmed by these free trade
acts. The U.S. has NAFTA-style trade deals with 17 other nations, and our
cumulative trade deficit in cattle and beef is twice as high with these 17
countries as it is with the rest of the world. Over the past 30 years,
more than half a million beef ranchers have left the industry as large
meatpackers have reaped the benefits of these flawed trade agreements.
Under the proposed deal, Korea could import cattle from China (the world’s
third-largest cattle herd) and get preferred treatment to ship that beef
to the U.S. Adding insult to injury, South Korea bans imports of our beef
from cattle over 30 months old due to fears of mad cow disease. Colombia,
a major beef producer, would also be able to trans-ship from Brazil, a
gargantuan beef producer whose imports would harm our cattle industry.
All three free trade acts have weak rules on labor standards and food
safety and inspection which put Michigan farmers at a disadvantage. A
Michigan cherry grower has to adhere to labor, environmental, pesticide
and chemical usage standards that their counterparts overseas don’t face.
Finally, all three acts weaken American sovereignty. Foreign investors
and foreign corporations would be able to challenge state and federal laws
before unelected, unaccountable international tribunals such as the World
Bank and United Nations. The American taxpayer would have no rights of
due process, and we’d be on the hook to pay compensation for claimed trade
pact violations.
We see how this works with the recent World Trade Organization ruling
striking down U.S. country of origin labeling law. That law – approved by
the U.S. Congress – lets consumers know where the food they eat is grown.
The Canadian and Mexican governments challenged it, saying it gives food
grown in the U.S.A. an unfair advantage over imports. If the ruling
stands, the will of the American people will be nullified by anonymous
bureaucrats in Geneva, and American citizens could be asked to pay
“damages” to foreign agribusinesses “hurt” by our country-of-origin laws.
Michigan’s 4th congressional district contains more farms than any other
district in the state. We urge Congressman Dave Camp to reject these badly
flawed trade deals. Michigan’s farmers and working families deserve fair
trade and a fair shake, not the continued attack on our way of life that
these pacts represent.

Curtis W. Ellis is the executive director of the American Jobs Alliance
http://www.americanjobsalliance.com/ Marilynn Momber is president of
Michigan Farmers Union http://www.nfu.org/

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5