Letters

Letters 08-24-2015

Bush And Blame Jeb Bush strikes again. Understand that Bush III represents the nearly extinct, compassionate-conservative, moderate wing of the Republican party...

No More State Theatre I was quite surprised and disgusted by an article I saw in last week’s edition. On pages 18 and 19 was an article about how the State Theatre downtown let some homosexual couple get married there...

GMOs Unsustainable Steve Tuttle’s column on GMOs was both uninformed and off the mark. Genetic engineering will not feed the world like Tuttle claims. However, GMOs do have the potential to starve us because they are unsustainable...

A Pin Drop Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 to a group of Democrats in Charlevoix, an all-white, seemingly middle class, well-educated audience, half of whom were female...

A Slippery Slope Most of us would agree that an appropriate suggestion to a physician who refuses to provide a blood transfusion to a dying patient because of the doctor’s religious views would be, “Please doctor, change your profession as a less selfish means of protecting your religious freedom.”

Stabilize Our Climate Climate scientists have been saying that in order to stabilize the climate, we need to limit global warming to less than two degrees. Renewables other than hydropower provide less than 3 percent of the world energy. In order to achieve the two degree scenario, the world needs to generate 11 times more wind power by 2050, and 36 times more solar power. It will require a big helping of new nuclear power, too...

Harm From GMOs I usually agree with the well-reasoned opinions expressed in Stephen Tuttle’s columns but I must challenge his assertions concerning GMO foods. As many proponents of GMOs do, Mr. Tuttle conveniently ignores the basic fact that GMO corn, soybeans and other crops have been engineered to withstand massive quantities of herbicides. This strategy is designed to maximize profits for chemical companies, such as Monsanto. The use of copious quantities of herbicides, including glyphosates, is losing its effectiveness and the producers of these poisons are promoting the use of increasingly dangerous substances to achieve the same results...

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · Free trade packed bad for...
. . . .

Free trade packed bad for Michigan agriculture

Curtis W. Ellis & Marilyn Momber - June 27th, 2011
Free trade pacts bad for Michigan agriculture
By Curtis W. Ellis & Marilynn Momber
Pending free trade agreements with Korea, Colombia and Panama are bad for
Michigan farmers and must be rejected if we are to preserve our way of
life.
All three trade treaties are based on NAFTA-style policies which have
displaced American farmers while sending jobs that support Michigan’s
rural communities offshore. In fact, our leading export is jobs even as we
reward companies that outsource jobs. Since NAFTA took effect, the United
States has lost 300,000 farms and millions of jobs.
Major commodity groups and agribusiness organizations have been beating
the drum for passage of these free trade agreements (FTAs). They make
dubious claims that there will be massive export gains for farm products
as a result of these FTAs.
The American Farm Bureau Federation Farm has released a study that
estimates the Korea FTA would result in $1.65 billion in additional U.S.
agricultural sales - but the Farm Bureau’s figures only look at gross
exports while never including expanded imports. Net trade is what
matters.
The Farm Bureau’s fuzzy math also arbitrarily assumes an automatic 10%
increase (a figure pulled out of thin air) for U.S. market share in Korea
for every American agricultural sector, despite a finding from the U.S.
International Trade Commission (USITC) that says corn, soybeans and wheat
would be net losers, and rice is not even covered in the Korea FTA. The
USITC projects many American agricultural sectors would face a worsening
trade balance were the free trade agreement to be implemented. This is a
very serious manipulation.
Loopholes in the FTAs rules-of-origin promote “leakage,” so countries such
as China and Vietnam are allowed to gain at our expense.
Since only 35% of a product’s value must be added in Korea, there is a
major trans-shipment risk from China in processed foods. Chinese apples
have already decimated the Michigan apple industry and we should not be
allowing food processed in the U.S. or Korea but grown elsewhere to get
free trade benefits such as the duty-free access provided by the deal.
Michigan cattle and beef producers will also be harmed by these free trade
acts. The U.S. has NAFTA-style trade deals with 17 other nations, and our
cumulative trade deficit in cattle and beef is twice as high with these 17
countries as it is with the rest of the world. Over the past 30 years,
more than half a million beef ranchers have left the industry as large
meatpackers have reaped the benefits of these flawed trade agreements.
Under the proposed deal, Korea could import cattle from China (the world’s
third-largest cattle herd) and get preferred treatment to ship that beef
to the U.S. Adding insult to injury, South Korea bans imports of our beef
from cattle over 30 months old due to fears of mad cow disease. Colombia,
a major beef producer, would also be able to trans-ship from Brazil, a
gargantuan beef producer whose imports would harm our cattle industry.
All three free trade acts have weak rules on labor standards and food
safety and inspection which put Michigan farmers at a disadvantage. A
Michigan cherry grower has to adhere to labor, environmental, pesticide
and chemical usage standards that their counterparts overseas don’t face.
Finally, all three acts weaken American sovereignty. Foreign investors
and foreign corporations would be able to challenge state and federal laws
before unelected, unaccountable international tribunals such as the World
Bank and United Nations. The American taxpayer would have no rights of
due process, and we’d be on the hook to pay compensation for claimed trade
pact violations.
We see how this works with the recent World Trade Organization ruling
striking down U.S. country of origin labeling law. That law – approved by
the U.S. Congress – lets consumers know where the food they eat is grown.
The Canadian and Mexican governments challenged it, saying it gives food
grown in the U.S.A. an unfair advantage over imports. If the ruling
stands, the will of the American people will be nullified by anonymous
bureaucrats in Geneva, and American citizens could be asked to pay
“damages” to foreign agribusinesses “hurt” by our country-of-origin laws.
Michigan’s 4th congressional district contains more farms than any other
district in the state. We urge Congressman Dave Camp to reject these badly
flawed trade deals. Michigan’s farmers and working families deserve fair
trade and a fair shake, not the continued attack on our way of life that
these pacts represent.

Curtis W. Ellis is the executive director of the American Jobs Alliance
http://www.americanjobsalliance.com/ Marilynn Momber is president of
Michigan Farmers Union http://www.nfu.org/



 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close