Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · The Wrong Turn
. . . .

The Wrong Turn

Steven Tuttle - September 5th, 2011
The Wrong Turn
There will be much introspection and reflection over the next few days.
We’ll see the horrifying videos of commercial airliners being flown into
the World Trade Towers. We will once again wonder why no one was able to
“connect the dots” and take preventative action. There will be memorial
services and candlelight vigils.
We’ll collectively wonder if we’ve learned anything at all. But as bad as
9/11 was, it’s the decisions we’ve made since that should concern us.
We knew almost immediately a group calling itself al Qaida was responsible
and that the Taliban, then returning Afghanistan to the 16th century they
so love, had aided and abetted them.
In the smartest military move of the entire decade of conflict, we
unleashed a relative handful (fewer than 100) of our best special
operations vets in Afghanistan. They formed an uneasy but effective
coalition with what came to be known as the Northern Alliance, a group of
tribal warlords who despised the Taliban for their own reasons.
With the assistance of U.S. air power, the Taliban were routed. We won.
Unsatisfied with our victory and unwilling to let the Afghan people decide
their own fate, we poured in occupying troops. The longest war in our
history was under way.
Meanwhile, our Congress passed the Patriot Act which has almost nothing to
do with patriotism. As a result, our e-mails and cell phone calls can be
routinely captured and instantly scanned by computer software looking for
key words and phrases. Our bank accounts can be examined, our medical
records pulled, our lives laid bare all without us ever knowing it’s
happening. To protect us from terrorism, don’t you know.
We can be arrested without knowing the charges, be held without any
contact with the outside world including a lawyer, be tried in a
secret tribunal and be denied access even to the charges against us.
In the name of national security.
It is the biggest assault on civil liberties in our lifetime and has
weakened some portions of the Bill of Rights to a point where they have
become almost unrecognizable.
Then, of course, there was the nightmare of Iraq.
Too many of us nodded approvingly when Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld and
Rice said Iraq was a direct and imminent threat to our security. They told
us the war would be quick and the Iraqi people would welcome us as heroes.
In fact, they took us to war to protect us from a threat that did not
exist and into a country that did not, and does not, want us there.
Here is some of what we now know and some of the consequences:
We know Iraq had exactly zero involvement in the events that led up to the
attacks of 9/11.
We know Saddam Hussein had no relationship with Osama bin Laden nor was he
involved with or helping al Qaida.
We know Iraq had no biological weapons or a biological weapons program.
We know Iraq had no chemical weapons or a chemical weapons program.
We know Iraq had no nuclear weapons or a nuclear weapons program.
We know that virtually everything Gen. Colin Powell said in his now
infamous presentation to the United Nations was false.
We know Iraq pre-9/11, served as a useful counter-balance to the loons
running Iran.
We know that in the absence of Hussein, and any functional government in
Iraq, Iran has gained both military power and political and strategic
influence in the region.
We know more than 31,000 Americans have been seriously wounded in Iraq,
many with permanent and debilitating traumatic brain injuries or
amputations. (More than 13,000 more have been wounded in Afghanistan.)
We know nearly 4,500 of our sons and daughters, brothers and sisters,
mothers and fathers, have died fighting in Iraq. (The death toll in
Afghanistan exceeds 1,600.)
We know vets returning from Iraq have higher instances of divorce,
unemployment, bankruptcy and drug and alcohol abuse than the general
We know the direct cost of the war in Iraq is now more than $800 billion
and the indirect costs (impact on the economy, lost jobs, social services
and government assistance for vets, etc.) is approaching $5 trillion.
(We’ve spent another $440 billion in Afghanistan, so far.)
We know that Iraqi civilian deaths during the war are at least 109,000
(according to U.S. military documents leaked by Wikileaks.com) but might
be as high as 600,000 (according to research published in The Lancet, the
world’s oldest peer-reviewed medical journal).
Instead of pensively looking backwards to 2001 it might be more beneficial
if we look ahead.
How long do we intend to stay in Iraq and Afghanistan? If neither is able
to prove they can self-govern are we prepared to stay forever? Why should
we decide what is adequate self-governance in Iraq and Afghanistan instead
of the people who live there? What, exactly, is our policy on foreign
military intervention? Why are the current presidential candidates, who
are so worried about too much government, not outraged by the egregious
government intrusions of the Patriot Act?
Reflection on the past is instructive and, occasionally, cathartic. But
looking back to 2001, it’s easy to believe we’ve taken a wrong turn onto a
circular path. If we don’t change direction, in another 10 years we’ll
again be reflecting on 9/11 and talking about the subsequent wars that
never ended.
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5