Letters

Letters 08-24-2015

Bush And Blame Jeb Bush strikes again. Understand that Bush III represents the nearly extinct, compassionate-conservative, moderate wing of the Republican party...

No More State Theatre I was quite surprised and disgusted by an article I saw in last week’s edition. On pages 18 and 19 was an article about how the State Theatre downtown let some homosexual couple get married there...

GMOs Unsustainable Steve Tuttle’s column on GMOs was both uninformed and off the mark. Genetic engineering will not feed the world like Tuttle claims. However, GMOs do have the potential to starve us because they are unsustainable...

A Pin Drop Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 to a group of Democrats in Charlevoix, an all-white, seemingly middle class, well-educated audience, half of whom were female...

A Slippery Slope Most of us would agree that an appropriate suggestion to a physician who refuses to provide a blood transfusion to a dying patient because of the doctor’s religious views would be, “Please doctor, change your profession as a less selfish means of protecting your religious freedom.”

Stabilize Our Climate Climate scientists have been saying that in order to stabilize the climate, we need to limit global warming to less than two degrees. Renewables other than hydropower provide less than 3 percent of the world energy. In order to achieve the two degree scenario, the world needs to generate 11 times more wind power by 2050, and 36 times more solar power. It will require a big helping of new nuclear power, too...

Harm From GMOs I usually agree with the well-reasoned opinions expressed in Stephen Tuttle’s columns but I must challenge his assertions concerning GMO foods. As many proponents of GMOs do, Mr. Tuttle conveniently ignores the basic fact that GMO corn, soybeans and other crops have been engineered to withstand massive quantities of herbicides. This strategy is designed to maximize profits for chemical companies, such as Monsanto. The use of copious quantities of herbicides, including glyphosates, is losing its effectiveness and the producers of these poisons are promoting the use of increasingly dangerous substances to achieve the same results...

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · The Drug Testing Debate...
. . . .

The Drug Testing Debate in Petoskey

George Foster - October 24th, 2002
Is drug testing the best way to deter substance abuse by our youth? Community forums discussing this issue were triggered recently when a Petoskey school board member suggested drug testing for schools. The reason: to help prevent students from becoming problem drug users.
Drug abuse has obviously been difficult to resolve nationwide, let alone in Petoskey. So, it shouldn‘t be surprising there was no consensus in favor or against testing among those attending the Petoskey meetings. I have always believed emphasis of personal responsibility for one‘s own actions is the best policy attacking drug abuse. Tough drug laws, TV ad campaigns, and presidential proclamations have all failed to make a dent into the problem.
Yet, since a friend of mine died of a drug overdose recently, I have had to rethink my position. Most of her friends seemed to be shocked that she must have had a serious drug problem. As I look back, maybe drug testing could have saved her life.
What if employers had random drug tests in place as a requirement for working? Also, is it asking too much for each student to undergo drug testing before being admitted to our educational systems?
My deceased friend had so much to live for: she was bright, attractive and had big plans for the future. Only in her mid-20‘s, she also had two beautiful children whom she loved deeply. This tragedy should not have happened. If the schools she attended and jobs she worked had all required her to be clean before coming on board maybe her life would have turned out differently.
Whatever they decide, I commend the Petoskey School Board for studying this serious problem.

Speaking of forums, will we ever have an independent commission to investigate the 9/11 attacks? In part because of pressure by family members of the victims, the Bush administration had finally given its okay to set up an independent commission. The intent was to create a group of impartial members who would perform a complete review of the causes of the tragedy. Such an investigation would be allowed to look at previous and current presidential administrations without the political considerations that a congressional review would tend to invite.
Yet, last week House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Porter Goss suddenly pulled the plug on creating such a commission. He referred to influences “above my pay grade“ as causing his reversal, according to sources cited by Newsweek magazine.
The same sources insist VP Dick Cheney was that “higher power“, placing a call to Chairman Goss that squashed the investigation. Cheney is on record as opposing any review of the administration‘s actions relating to 9/11.
The terrorist attacks of last year were the most cataclysmic event of this generation and the failure to appoint an independent commission would be a travesty. The victims‘ families deserve to know why it happened. You and I deserve to know why it happened. I refuse to believe our vice president doesn‘t care to know the same.
No one I know is blaming the tragedy on U.S. government officials. We need this investigation because no one wants 9/11 to ever happen, again. Is that too much to ask?



 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close