Letters

Letters 09-26-2016

Welcome To 1984 The Democrat Party, the government education complex, private corporations and foundations, the news media and the allpervasive sports and entertainment industry have incrementally repressed the foundational right of We the People to publicly debate open borders, forced immigration, sanctuary cities and the calamitous destruction of innate gender norms...

Grow Up, Kachadurian Apparently Tom Kachadurian has great words; too bad they make little sense. His Sept. 19 editorial highlights his prevalent beliefs that only Hillary and the Dems are engaged in namecalling and polarizing actions. Huh? What rock does he live under up on Old Mission...

Facts MatterThomas Kachadurian’s “In the Basket” opinion deliberately chooses to twist what Clinton said. He chooses to argue that her basket lumped all into the clearly despicable categories of the racist, sexist, homophobic , etc. segments of the alt right...

Turn Off Fox, Kachadurian I read Thomas Kachadurian’s opinion letter in last week’s issue. It seemed this opinion was the product of someone who offered nothing but what anyone could hear 24/7/365 on Fox News; a one-sided slime job that has been done better by Fox than this writer every day of the year...

Let’s Fix This Political Process Enough! We have been embroiled in the current election cycle for…well, over a year, or is it almost two? What is the benefit of this insanity? Exorbitant amounts of money are spent, candidates are under the microscope day and night, the media – now in action 24/7 – focuses on anything and everything anyone does, and then analyzes until the next event, and on it goes...

Can’t Cut Taxes 

We are in a different place today. The slogan, “Making America Great Again” begs the questions, “great for whom?” and “when was it great?” I have claimed my generation has lived in a bubble since WWII, which has offered a prosperity for a majority of the people. The bubble has burst over the last few decades. The jobs which provided a good living for people without a college degree are vanishing. Unions, which looked out for the welfare of employees, have been shrinking. Businesses have sought to produce goods where labor is not expensive...

Wrong About Clinton In response to Thomas Kachadurian’s column, I have to take issue with many of his points. First, his remarks about Ms. Clinton’s statement regarding Trump supporters was misleading. She was referring to a large segment of his supporters, not all. And the sad fact is that her statement was not a “smug notion.” Rather, it was the sad truth, as witnessed by the large turnout of new voters in the primaries and the ugly incidents at so many of his rallies...

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · The Resurrection of...
. . . .

The Resurrection of Martha

George Foster - March 10th, 2005
It is 1:30 a.m. and a Pistons game on the West Coast is winding down on TV. Before going back to sleep I flipped the channel to CNN and was alarmed to see an airplane on the tarmac as a black vehicle pulled up nearby. Has there been another airliner hijacking? Have terrorists demanded a plane to be provided to whisk them away to Tehran?
No, I finally realized that Martha Stewart‘s release from jail was being carried live, complete with reporters hollering the usual inane questions from behind the security fence, “Martha, are you glad to be out?“
As Stewart walked the short distance to the airplane that would take her home for the first time in five months, the commentators observed how healthy she looked, the radiance of her smile, and the appropriateness of her attire.
Good grief, the media coverage is this intense a few minutes after being sprung from the joint? With her acute business sense, Martha Stewart will undoubtedly embrace her freedom with financial windfall that will be staggering - well beyond her previous highpoint.
Already, the stock in her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, has jumped back to its former price level. She has two highly anticipated TV shows ready to hit the air. Advertising has begun to fill the pages of her magazine, again. Million dollar book deals are in the making. Movies will be next. Everyone wants to know, “How did Martha spend her time behind bars?“ Making license plates? Sharing chocolate chip cookie recipes? Doing the chain gang thing?
What I find ironic is that Martha Stewart was convicted because her detractors wanted her knocked down a notch. Undisclosed officials in the SEC admit that the feds wanted to make an example of her to deter others from making profits illegally on insider stock transactions. Meanwhile, O.J. Simpson and corporate crooks that bilked thousands of ordinary people out of their retirement funds walk free.
Martha Stewart‘s enemies, who were salivating at the prospect of her financial empire in ashes and Martha ostracized as a pariah, must be tortured as she comes back bigger than ever.
In a way, not much has really changed. Welcome back, Martha.

When Alan Greenspan speaks, E.F. Hutton listens.
Recently, when the Chairman of the Federal Reserve suggested that he favors a consumption tax over income tax, the economic pundits took notice.
Many economists have long favored a form of consumption tax. Until Greenspan‘s admission, a consumption tax has been considered folly, about as likely to happen as cessation of Bill Clinton‘s roving eye or George W. Bush admitting to any mistakes. The respect for Greenspan‘s every word, however, has raised the idea of a consumption-based tax to mainstream status overnight.
Think of a world where there are no income tax returns to be competed, no accountants to be paid, and best of all - very little withholding from your paycheck. Think of a world where we can all earn as much money as possible and never entertain even a thought of tax consequences in a profitable year. Think of a world...yes, I‘m serious here, where there is no IRS. Don‘t tear up your 1040‘s forms just yet, but the abolition of personal income taxes may be imminent.
President Bush has stated that income tax reform (as opposed to the usual politically motivated tax cuts) will be a very high priority in his second term. Currently, the IRS code is a nightmare of mumbo-jumbo, complicated by mountains of regulations, interpretations, and tax legislation. Each presidential administration gives lip service to tax reform, but adds more taxes or tax cuts to the unwieldy mess. The bulging patchwork that we call the IRS code is near eruption.
Due to Greenspan‘s endorsement, the president may go for the end zone - a consumption based tax. If a consumption tax replaced our income tax system, the tradeoff is that we would all pay significantly more taxes when buying goods. People, just consider the consumption tax to be akin to tough-love. We all need incentive to save more of our earnings, right? The beauty of the consumption tax is if you decide your taxes are too high - DON‘T BUY ANYTHING.
In general, I have not supported President Bush‘s economic policies. Privatization of social security won‘t fix the problem and the federal deficit of $7 trillion is a national scandal. Yet, Bush is on the right path if he decides to push for a consumption tax.
It is time to eliminate income taxes once and for all.





 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close