Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters 11/29/04
. . . .

Letters 11/29/04

Various - November 29th, 2002
Water woes

Holly Spaulding‘s article on the “New Water Order“ (11/7) is nothing but a continuation of the disingenuous arguments (already continued ad nauseum) that the Sweetwater Alliance has treated NE readers to over the last few months.
No one has answered some pretty basic questions about the whole Sweetwater hysteria: Why is the Ice Mountain factory, in itself, worth all this hoopla aside from the fact that a foreign multi-national is a good target for mindless protesting? Nothing, after all, makes people lay down on the asphalt like rich foreigners exploiting “our“ resources, right?
Also, how is it that a bunch of Michiganders trying to make sure that Great Lakes water never leaves the Great Lakes Basin (which ends about 30 miles inland from the lakes) have anything whatsoever in common with people who have no water across the globe? If the Sweetwater Alliance wins their point, doesn‘t that mean that the world‘s thirsty masses will never be able to get their grubby hands on our water? I mean, isn‘t that really the point of all the scary propaganda about the coming water crisis and the threat it poses to “our“ water.
Isn‘t this movement predicated on the assumption that it‘s better for millions to die of thirst than for the recreational fishing industry in Michigan to be damaged? Or is the Sweetwater Alliance willing to say that they are foursquare behind the idea that we in North America ought to make some sacrifices -- even some environmentally unpleasant sacrifices -- in order to ensure that the people of the world get what they call their “right“ -- access to clean fresh water. I am very interested to know the answer to this question, because the Sweetwater Alliance has spent a lot of time playing both sides of the street on this crucial issue.
Water is a hot issue. Water is something that we should care about. It‘s something we should care about too much to lie and obfuscate. I feel water and water rights are, indeed, issues that will define our future. I think Sweetwater feels that water is a good hot issue to get people to carry picket signs. And lying and obfuscating about water issues is fine so long as it is in the service of the greater cause of possibly “radicalizing“ the masses.
Well, lotsa‘ luck on radicalizing the masses, but I think it far more likely that you‘ll destroy the prospects for an intelligent solution to our water issues than that you‘ll “radicalize“ very many people.

Oran Kelley • via email

Ill-informed attack

Annaka Dodd’s letter, “Too little, too late,” (11/21) is an ill-informed attack on Jim Olson and Holly Spaulding and is evidence of the fact that she is obviously not aware of the depth of their work nor of their convictions. In particular, Jim Olson has dedicated his life to protect what’s left of our natural resources. Before she writes another high-minded, contradictory letter, she’d better check the facts. Implying that someone of Jim’s stature and passion spends too much time relaxing in front of an incense burner or regards activism as just another form of party game is a little like implying that George Bush spends too much time reading Mensa newsletters.

Mike Delp • Green Lake Township

Buy Nothing Day

This November 29, a world celebration of values outside the box of consumerism is taking place, and it is called Buy Nothing Day. The day after Thanksgiving, the 29th will be typically thought of as the busiest shopping day of the year, but this year people all over the world, from North America to Europe, are redefining this day to mean something different. Instead of going out and spending the day in shopping malls or super centers, many people are taking a break from consumer spending to spend more time with families or sponsor free community events.
In a time of economic recession, many people view Buy Nothing Day in a negative light, writing it off as a mindless attack against the American economy.
Buy Nothing Day is far from mindless. In a world in which 20% of the population consumes over 80% of its natural resources, the distribution of wealth is far from equitable. The American way of life has come to be based around over-consumption, which is reflected in the vast amounts of resources that we, as Americans, consume for the sake of convenience and not necessity, and by the amount of waste this new economic system creates. I use the term “new economic system“ because America‘s economy wasn‘t always based on consuming anything it could get its hands on.
Today‘s disposable way of life is far from the values of early Puritan settlements that emphasized simplicity and clean living. Thanksgiving was meant to be a day to reflect on what we have, not a day reserved for gluttony. Unfortunately in today‘s corporate landscape, such holidays have been stolen from us and their meanings lost.
Christmas too has been stolen and then marketed back to us in our own homes. If there is a Grinch, it has made itself known in the form of corporate America. Christmas is no longer a time to celebrate, but a time to make demands for more toys. How are children supposed to know any better when the commercials seen along with Saturday morning cartoons are specifically designed with the help of teams of psychoanalysts to induce nagging?
Every time you buy something, there is a true cost of your purchase that can‘t be measured with dollars or cents. Somehow what you bought was manufactured, and someday you will most likely throw it away. Gas had to be burned to ship it to a store nearby; chemicals had to be released into the air or maybe even water. Perhaps what you bought was made by 10-year-old children working 70-hour weeks just to survive. Our world isn‘t dying; it is being killed by multinational corporations and the way they do business.
Without a sustainable habitat, we, like any other living things, are sure to perish. Until our economy can be redesigned to take the true costs of our actions as inhabitants of this planet into account, we will fail to realize that there are other types of wealth besides the material kind. As long as another rain forest being felled just shows up as numbers on a page, our natural world will continued to be destroyed. After all, it‘s just business.
This year, participate by not participating. Celebrate Buy Nothing Day on Nov. 29.
For more information go to www.adbusters.org or contact Jason at 932-7837.

Jason Glover • via email

Hitchens‘ cheap shot

In your column of the Nov. 14-20 issue (“Random Thoughts“) you refer to Christopher Hitchens as an example of some recent defections of a few “liberals who favor war.“ You erroneously state that he “quit the editorship of “The Nation“ magazine last month out of disgust over leftist attitudes.“ To the best of my knowledge, Hitchens has never been the editor of “The Nation.“ The editor was, and remains, Katrina vanden Heuvel.
Hitchens was a regular contributor, known as a contrarian, whose forte is ruffling feathers. In that sense, I am not at all surprised at his stance towards the war in Iraq. Hitchens is the archetypal schoolboy prefect who never grew up and got over himself, a sort of liberal version of William F. Buckley, a narcissistic know it all. So it wasn‘t a big shock to see Hitchens part from his “Nation“ gig with a cheap shot jab at his former colleagues. I wouldn‘t take it as indicative of anything like a reasoned argument for war against Iraq.
If you want to read Katha Pollit‘s impassioned but informed reply to Hitchens‘ parting shot, check it out at “The Nation“ web site, http://www.thenation.com or, better yet, subscribe to “The Nation.“

Mark Smith • Lake Leelanau

The nursing strike

Much of value has already been said regarding the reasons for nurses‘ strike at Northern Michigan Hospital in Petoskey. The hospital claims this is mostly a dollar issue, while the 200+ nurses out on strike cite patient safety and the nurses‘ need for greater input into critical policy decisions (i.e., nurse-to-patient ratios).
The history of women in health care involves issues of em-powerment for women specifically, and for direct-care healers and community health advocates in general. In Medieval times, the role of women as herbalists and village healers came under direct assault by new institutions competing for that power. The church of the Middle Ages branded local herbalists and folk healers “witches“ -- and it was the testimony of physicians in the rising new medical profession that often helped send those mainly female village healers to death. Since “only those who have attended the new medical colleges“ could legally serve as attendants to the sick, and since women were specifically banned from enrolling in these colleges, the rise of a male-dominated medical establishment was guaranteed.
The disempowerment of nurses thus has its roots set deeply in the Middle Ages. What we are witnessing now is the efforts of many of our local nurses to regain a powerful voice in helping to shape important health care issues in our community today.
All individuals of conscience -- whether they be on the Board of NMH, physicians, nurses who choose to continue to work in the hospital, or nurses who are out on the picket lines every morning in protest -- must first acknowledge that more than money is at stake here.
Our local strike in Petoskey is not an isolated event centering around paychecks or self-aggrandizement; rather it concerns the broader social issue of whose voices will get counted, and whose won‘t in health care reform today.
Some in our community seem shocked that so many nurses would choose to join a union and protest out in our streets to gain this voice -- indeed it is a strange sight for our quiet town of Petoskey. Yet we must remember that every social reform movement from women‘s suffrage to civil rights has found people of good conscience picketing, cheering, and waving signs for change. The health care reform movement today is clearly coming of age, and whether we find it distasteful or inspiring, people of good conscience are out in our streets every day advocating for reform.
My letter is one of support for all nurses, striking or not, but especially for those brave ones who have put their job security and personal comforts on the line. They are our true heroines and heroes now. They stand outside their hospital and ours every day in the cold, taking risks not only for the future of their profession, but for matters of deep concern to us all.

Jim Norgaard • Petoskey

On the backs of nurses

Northern Michigan Hospital nurses have joined a growing number of nurses across the nation in striking. Across the U.S., nurses struggle under increasing patient loads, longer hours and reduced benefits. For many years, the administration and boards of Michigan‘s hospitals have faced an impending crisis. The unionization of the nurses at Northern Michigan Hospital is symptomatic of a much larger health care crisis.
While the administration and board of Northern Michigan hospitals may have been out of touch with staff, mismanagement at the local level is a small part of the health care crisis in America. Nurses across America are being pinched by hospital boards and administration as the government abdicates responsibility for health care, and as insurance and medical costs make basic health coverage out of reach for average Americans.
All local hospitals in Northern Michigan are non-profit. New equipment and technology are vital and hospital income must be reinvested in the operation. The cost of pharmaceuticals continues to escalate. Today, half the patients are Medicare beneficiaries (Northern Michigan treated 66,000 Medicaid patients in 1998), and Medicare and Medicaid do not cover costs of care. As revenues have fallen, more and more people are uninsured.
Hospitals have depended on charitable donations to meet losses. At Munson, the interest from their endowment fund, in the good years, made up for huge losses. But as markets tank, hospitals dependent on endowments have suffered. Rural hospitals have been closing at a frightening rate and the large hospitals must take up the burden of the rural poor and uninsured. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 hit hospitals hard and administrative costs went up six-fold when the state changed to “managed care“ from fee-for-service.
The cost of keeping up with new science and technology is enormous. Northern Michigan Hospital‘s capital campaign for a new emergency unit has raised $13 million of $15 million needed. The Burns Clinic Foundation had an additional $26,886,386 in investment/ securities in 2000.
The woes of hospitals will not be fixed on the backs of the nurses. The problem is way too big. Across the nation, skimming dollars from nurses‘ pensions and increasing patient loads will only delay the death of a failed health system. Part of the disease is our society‘s inability to wrestle with really difficult problems. People are living longer, and high tech medicine offers new cures and greater expense. Who will live and who will die... who gets care and what care they will get, has been determined to a great extent by who can pay. The working poor and uninsured cannot afford basic health care and medicine, while well-insured people have access to high-tech diagnostic medicine and extreme life-prolonging measures. It is a story of failed government leadership and a health care system that is floundering. It will get worse as baby boomers get old.
One thing is certain. Hospitals cannot stay in business if they continue to lose money. Until the American health system is drastically rehabilitated, hospitals, their staffs and boards are headed straight for the shoals. Throwing the nurses overboard will not save them.

Jo Anne Beemon • via email

Turnaround for judge

Yes, another letter / opinion directed towards the behavior of Judge Gilbert. The more letters that I read offering understanding and leniency towards your Honor, the more outraged I become and less able to harness my silence. I am sorry this happened to a respected member of our community, but I am not sorry that he got caught. Perhaps now he may feel what it’s like for those who get caught and have to stand in front of him in his courtroom.
I will admit that my vendetta is personal, as all three of my children, when they were teenagers in Traverse City, experienced the fear and uncertainty of being “caught“ irregardless of the circumstances: being in a friend‘s car with marijuana or at a party that was raided and yes, even guilty of a “puff or two.“ Well, now they are still paying the consequences every time they fill out a job application that requires an answer to that conviction question. Specifically, my daughter happened to draw Tom Gilbert as her court-appointed attorney for a misdemeanor. She was young, scared and unknowledgeable of the entire judicial process. Yes, she committed the act, but her lawyer, who was designated to represent her, was cold, indifferent and minimally spent time with her to “understand“ the situation or even know her beyond her name on his docket. Where was the understanding when the roles were reversed?
Yes, we all make mistakes and must understand and forgive, but we also must abide by the laws. So, when laws are broken, even by one careless act, and as my children learned, there are far-reaching consequences and restitution. Should we expect any less of the person who delivers these judgements ? I can‘t.

Unsigned • TC

(The writer’s name has been omitted by request to preserve the anonimity of her children.)

Anthrax vaccine

I am thankful to see that you have told the story about the anthrax vaccine (11/21). I am director of education and research for Michigan Opposing Mandatory Vaccines, a nonprofit organization dedicated to insuring freedom for parents in Michigan to make educated vaccine choices for their children.
I know Major Randy Bates personally and helped organize a rally in Lansing on the capitol steps last year for the anti-anthrax vaccine movement. I am not only deeply concerned for the servicemen of this country, but the children as well. They are being exposed to toxic chemicals through the childhood vaccines.
As I write, the Senate just passed the “Homeland Security Act,“ which gives the government the power to force all Americans to get the smallpox vaccine. Very few people know about this vaccine and the special interest groups pushed this act through before it was thoroughly discussed.
I am part of a huge network of vaccine groups around the country, and we all spent hours faxing and calling our senators to plead with them to hold up the vote, or vote no. Along with the vaccine mandate, they snuck in, at the last minute, an amendment which bails out a pharmaceutical company called Eli Lilly. The company manufactures thimerosol, a form of mercury used in childhood vaccines. This drug manufacturer is targeted by class action law suits all around the country because strong evidence suggests that thimerosol is one of the main reasons for the huge increase in autism. They covered their butt by adding in a clause that, “Eli Lilly cannot be held liable for any litigation due to the thimerosol in vaccines.“ There is no thimerosol in the smallpox vaccine discussed in the Homeland Security Act, and therefore, this should not have been included in the act.
Well, the sick children of the USA just got screwed over. Autism affects one in every 150 children at this time and the statistics just keep on going up. There is overwhelming evidence that thimerosol is a key factor in the cause of autism, thanks to Congressman Dan Burton and the hearings he has been holding in Washington.

Mary Tocco • via email
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5