Letters

Letters 8-18-2014

The Climate Clarified

Climate change isn’t an easy subject. A class I’m taking compared it to medicine in a way that was helpful for me: Climate scientists are like planetary physicians. Our understanding of medicine is incomplete, but what we know is useful...

Beware Non-Locally Grown

The article “Farm Fresh?” couldn’t be any more true than exactly stated. As an avid shopper at the local farm markets I want to know “exactly” what I am buying, from GMO free to organic or not organic, sprayed or not sprayed and with what...

Media Bias Must End

I wish to thank Joel Weberman for his letter “Seeking Balanced Israel Coverage.” The pro-Palestinian bias includes TV news coverage...

Proud of My President

The world is a mess. According to many conservative voices, it would not be in such a mess if Obama was not the president. I am finally understanding that the problem with our president is that he is too thoughtful, too rational, too realistic, too inclined to see things differently and change his mind, too compassionate to be the leader of a free world...

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters 3/17/05
. . . .

Letters 3/17/05

Various - March 17th, 2005
A no-win plan
On February 23rd, a Republican group outside Senator Rick Santorum’s Social Security town hall meeting in Philadelphia was caught on CNN chanting, “Hey, hey. Ho, ho. Social Security has got to go.”
The “Social Security has got to go” chants of Republicans show that for the Republican base, privatization is just the first step towards getting rid of Social Security. The Republican Party opposed Social Security when it started and has opposed its expansion.
George Bush’s plan would make massive cuts in Social Security benefits for future retirees in order to pay for private accounts. Privatization diverts Social Security taxes used to pay current benefits into private accounts.
Privatization means trillions of dollars of new national debt. Because current Social Security taxes are used to pay for private accounts taking that money out means huge deficits -- as high as $15 trillion over the next 40 years.
The Republican plan would turn a guaranteed benefit into a guaranteed gamble. The stock market is risky and can’t be predicted -- that could mean millions of people won’t have the money they need when they need it.
The only clear winner of this plan are the members of Wall Street who receive a commission on every dollar invested, ranging from 1-5%. With annual management fees, and up front commissions, the rich get richer, and the rest of us get stuck paying the bill.
Jeff Culver • TC

Anti-war march planned
This weekend will mark the second year of the U.S. War on Iraq. This war is still illegal and any goals set by the United States first and foremost are for the benefit of the oil industry, the arms industry, the neo-liberal free-marketeers/privateers as well as the neo-conservative “new world order” builders. Neither the U.S. nor the Iraqi exiles hand-picked by the U.S. should determine the future of Iraq. The future of Iraq is for the Iraqis to determine.
Join the demonstration at Grandview and Parkway in Traverse City on Saturday, March 19 at noon against this war and acknowledge the 10s of 1,000s of Iraqis killed and/or wounded, the 1500 plus U.S. soldiers killed and the 16,000 plus U.S. soldiers injured in Iraq. Enough is enough!

Marian Kromkowski
• Suttons Bay

Phoney crisis
Mr. Bush cries “crisis.” And Social Security thereby is in crisis?
The Actuaries of Social Security, who are charged with maintaining the soundness of the program, say it’s okay until 2042. The Congressional Budget Office says it’s good until 2052. And a little tweak now and it’s okay forever. And now even the Bush budgeteers admit that’s right and privatization does no good.
So Mr. Bush, whose credentials manifestly lie more in the direction of mendacity than actuarial science, is mistaken, wrong, fallacious, deliberately misleading, etc... He is the “crisis.”
Why lie? Has he been listening to his voices? No. He really wants to bankrupt this country.
Well, there really is a rationale for this course of action and it was well expressed in the conservative mantra of Grover Norquist and Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute. They say: expand the deficit, correct it by sacrificing any social responsibilities, shrink the social government until you can drown it in a bathtub.
This sacrifices the concept that the government is entrusted with the public good and the welfare of all the people. The goal of the non-compassionate conservatives since the time of Roosevelt has been to divest government of responsibility for any social doctrine. They’re working on it. Guns and butter? No, just guns.
Now many of these same folks advocate adopting a flat tax on income? Which is not a bad idea applied to wages and income, say, by removing the cap on wages for Social Security. That’s a great flat tax.
And, further, if we were to exempt wages/income below the poverty level, say $15,000, from taxation, just to introduce some progressivity into the tax, we could do wonders for the health of Social Security. And, for the health of the people who pay into it.

Robert E. Marshall • Lake Leelanau

Think of women
Now that March is upon us, I would like to take this opportunity to recognize Women’s History Month. This is a time to honor women’s equality and contributions to our society. However, this year I would ask that readers will not just observe this month, but take action to help improve the lives of women who are not fortunate enough to live in the same circumstances as most of us in the U.S.
Each year, thousands of brides in India are burned to death for having insufficient dowries. In many countries, women who have been raped are killed by their own families to preserve the family’s honor. Female genital mutilation still occurs in about 28 African countries. Rape is still used as a weapon of war in Rwanda, Haiti, Colombia, Yugoslavia, and elsewhere.
Please give your time or money to organizations that address these issues. You can also ask your elected officials to help make these issues a priority in the United State’s foreign policy.

Monica Evans • Honor

Towering debt
The focus on Social Security, which is not in crisis, is a diversion from the national debt, which is in crisis.
Social Security is funded well into the future, even if nothing is done to fix it. The national debt is a huge burden we pass on to future generations. This is the inheritance we leave our children and grandchildren.

Orpha Shinn • Saginaw

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close