Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters 3/17/05
. . . .

Letters 3/17/05

Various - March 17th, 2005
A no-win plan
On February 23rd, a Republican group outside Senator Rick Santorum’s Social Security town hall meeting in Philadelphia was caught on CNN chanting, “Hey, hey. Ho, ho. Social Security has got to go.”
The “Social Security has got to go” chants of Republicans show that for the Republican base, privatization is just the first step towards getting rid of Social Security. The Republican Party opposed Social Security when it started and has opposed its expansion.
George Bush’s plan would make massive cuts in Social Security benefits for future retirees in order to pay for private accounts. Privatization diverts Social Security taxes used to pay current benefits into private accounts.
Privatization means trillions of dollars of new national debt. Because current Social Security taxes are used to pay for private accounts taking that money out means huge deficits -- as high as $15 trillion over the next 40 years.
The Republican plan would turn a guaranteed benefit into a guaranteed gamble. The stock market is risky and can’t be predicted -- that could mean millions of people won’t have the money they need when they need it.
The only clear winner of this plan are the members of Wall Street who receive a commission on every dollar invested, ranging from 1-5%. With annual management fees, and up front commissions, the rich get richer, and the rest of us get stuck paying the bill.
Jeff Culver • TC

Anti-war march planned
This weekend will mark the second year of the U.S. War on Iraq. This war is still illegal and any goals set by the United States first and foremost are for the benefit of the oil industry, the arms industry, the neo-liberal free-marketeers/privateers as well as the neo-conservative “new world order” builders. Neither the U.S. nor the Iraqi exiles hand-picked by the U.S. should determine the future of Iraq. The future of Iraq is for the Iraqis to determine.
Join the demonstration at Grandview and Parkway in Traverse City on Saturday, March 19 at noon against this war and acknowledge the 10s of 1,000s of Iraqis killed and/or wounded, the 1500 plus U.S. soldiers killed and the 16,000 plus U.S. soldiers injured in Iraq. Enough is enough!

Marian Kromkowski
• Suttons Bay

Phoney crisis
Mr. Bush cries “crisis.” And Social Security thereby is in crisis?
The Actuaries of Social Security, who are charged with maintaining the soundness of the program, say it’s okay until 2042. The Congressional Budget Office says it’s good until 2052. And a little tweak now and it’s okay forever. And now even the Bush budgeteers admit that’s right and privatization does no good.
So Mr. Bush, whose credentials manifestly lie more in the direction of mendacity than actuarial science, is mistaken, wrong, fallacious, deliberately misleading, etc... He is the “crisis.”
Why lie? Has he been listening to his voices? No. He really wants to bankrupt this country.
Well, there really is a rationale for this course of action and it was well expressed in the conservative mantra of Grover Norquist and Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute. They say: expand the deficit, correct it by sacrificing any social responsibilities, shrink the social government until you can drown it in a bathtub.
This sacrifices the concept that the government is entrusted with the public good and the welfare of all the people. The goal of the non-compassionate conservatives since the time of Roosevelt has been to divest government of responsibility for any social doctrine. They’re working on it. Guns and butter? No, just guns.
Now many of these same folks advocate adopting a flat tax on income? Which is not a bad idea applied to wages and income, say, by removing the cap on wages for Social Security. That’s a great flat tax.
And, further, if we were to exempt wages/income below the poverty level, say $15,000, from taxation, just to introduce some progressivity into the tax, we could do wonders for the health of Social Security. And, for the health of the people who pay into it.

Robert E. Marshall • Lake Leelanau

Think of women
Now that March is upon us, I would like to take this opportunity to recognize Women’s History Month. This is a time to honor women’s equality and contributions to our society. However, this year I would ask that readers will not just observe this month, but take action to help improve the lives of women who are not fortunate enough to live in the same circumstances as most of us in the U.S.
Each year, thousands of brides in India are burned to death for having insufficient dowries. In many countries, women who have been raped are killed by their own families to preserve the family’s honor. Female genital mutilation still occurs in about 28 African countries. Rape is still used as a weapon of war in Rwanda, Haiti, Colombia, Yugoslavia, and elsewhere.
Please give your time or money to organizations that address these issues. You can also ask your elected officials to help make these issues a priority in the United State’s foreign policy.

Monica Evans • Honor

Towering debt
The focus on Social Security, which is not in crisis, is a diversion from the national debt, which is in crisis.
Social Security is funded well into the future, even if nothing is done to fix it. The national debt is a huge burden we pass on to future generations. This is the inheritance we leave our children and grandchildren.

Orpha Shinn • Saginaw

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close