Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · CAFTA means more bad news...
. . . .

CAFTA means more bad news for Michigan

Sylvia Inwood - September 15th, 2005
Michigan has suffered worse from NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) than any other state. That treaty for “free trade” of the multinational corporations cost Michigan over 118,000 jobs since 1993.
Our net loss of 63,000 jobs is 1.44% of the state’s total employment at the end of last year -- almost double the national average. Hard times for small farmers and small businesses throughout Michigan can be traced back to NAFTA.
And as if NAFTA wasn’t bad enough, now we’re going to hafta suffer through CAFTA, too -- the Central American Free Trade Agreement.
Technically, it’s now “DR-CAFTA,” with the Dominican Republic tacked onto the Central American Free Trade Agreement. But, according to the World Bank, that still leaves our new trading partners with a total GDP last year of only $84 billion -- about the economic size of Tampa and its suburbs. Not a lot of disposable income there for people to buy U.S.-made goods... and not a lot of support among the people of the Dominican Republic or Central America.
But the “DR” does serve a purpose -- as a reminder that both Democrats and Republicans are to blame for this fiasco. Along with their senior partners . . . Corporate America.

WHO VOTED
More Republicans than Democrats voted for CAFTA, in the Senate June 30 and in the House July 27 -- and 28. The House vote took place over two days because Republican leaders had to hold the “15-minute roll-call vote” open for over an hour, cheating as well as bribing and threatening their way to a 217-215 victory at 12:03 a.m.
If you wonder what evidence there is that pork and pressure entered into the vote, consider that the National Journal Congress Daily surveyed House members on CAFTA for its July 26 issue -- and reported a 50-vote margin against the treaty.
Bush, Cheney, Rove, and the whole team were up on Capitol Hill twisting arms “into one thousand pieces,” as one yes-voting GOP congressman from Arizona put it. Still, at the end of the allotted 15 minutes, the vote count was 180 to 175 against CAFTA, so the Republican leadership kept the vote -- and the bullying tactics -- going.
After about 30 minutes, the vote count seemed to stall at 214 yes and 211 no... with eight Republicans who had committed to oppose CAFTA -- most of them from textile states -- yet to vote. They jockeyed for position for half an hour more, over who would be allowed to vote against the bill and save face back home. One of them now claims his “no” vote was mis-recorded as “not voting.” The other “NV” was cast by a Virginia Congresswoman whose spokesman said she “would have voted against CAFTA but was on her way to her district to attend a Boy Scout Jamboree event.” The event was canceled because of bad weather.

HARD-HIT FARMERS
But, even with all that, CAFTA would have been defeated if one more US Representative had voted “no” instead of “yes.” And 15 House Democrats, several of them in safe seats, voted yes.
So did six members of Michigan’s Congressional delegation. Vernon Ehlers of the 3rd District, was “officially” undecided when -- at his annual town hall meeting in April -- he told farmers who knew better that NAFTA had been good for Michigan and that trade agreements like NAFTA create jobs, not lose them. When a Michigan Farmers Union representative told Ehlers NAFTA has done nothing for Michigan, Ehlers ignored the applauding audience and dismissed the statement, saying that some of CAFTA’s best friends were farmers... and really only the sugar-beet farmers opposed it.
2nd District Representative Peter Hoekstra belonged to a clique of bread-now-or-bombs-later congressmembers who invoked the War on Terror and the red menace of an alternative trade vision from Castro’s Cuba and the latest leftist bugaboo, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela. Dan Burton of Indiana even raised the spectre of Che Guevara -- literally, since Guevara was assassinated by the CIA decades ago.
Joe Schwarz echoed Hoekstra’s “national security” rhetoric and Ehlers’ economic misinformation -- despite a poll in his 7th District’s largest city, Battle Creek, showing 85% opposition to CAFTA.

SWEET DEAL
Hoekstra, Ehlers, and Schwarz were joined in the pro-CAFTA camp by 4th District Representative Dave Camp -- after enough protections for sugar producers were thrown in to sweeten the deal -- as well as Fred Upton of the 6th District, and Joe Knollenberg of the 9th District.
The Green Party of Michigan has long opposed NAFTA, the World Trade Organization, and the whole alphabet soup of efforts to “create new rights for investors, global rights which will override local democracy, community economics, and human rights,” as GPMI’s platform puts it.
Republicans and Democrats compete over which can best advance ‘globalization’ of corporate power; Greens wish to reverse it. We are against corporate control of government and subordination of constitutional self-government to international trade bodies, and for limitations on corporate power.
If you support fair trade that benefits people, not corporations, vote yes for the Green Party.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close