Letters

Letters 08-24-2015

Bush And Blame Jeb Bush strikes again. Understand that Bush III represents the nearly extinct, compassionate-conservative, moderate wing of the Republican party...

No More State Theatre I was quite surprised and disgusted by an article I saw in last week’s edition. On pages 18 and 19 was an article about how the State Theatre downtown let some homosexual couple get married there...

GMOs Unsustainable Steve Tuttle’s column on GMOs was both uninformed and off the mark. Genetic engineering will not feed the world like Tuttle claims. However, GMOs do have the potential to starve us because they are unsustainable...

A Pin Drop Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 to a group of Democrats in Charlevoix, an all-white, seemingly middle class, well-educated audience, half of whom were female...

A Slippery Slope Most of us would agree that an appropriate suggestion to a physician who refuses to provide a blood transfusion to a dying patient because of the doctor’s religious views would be, “Please doctor, change your profession as a less selfish means of protecting your religious freedom.”

Stabilize Our Climate Climate scientists have been saying that in order to stabilize the climate, we need to limit global warming to less than two degrees. Renewables other than hydropower provide less than 3 percent of the world energy. In order to achieve the two degree scenario, the world needs to generate 11 times more wind power by 2050, and 36 times more solar power. It will require a big helping of new nuclear power, too...

Harm From GMOs I usually agree with the well-reasoned opinions expressed in Stephen Tuttle’s columns but I must challenge his assertions concerning GMO foods. As many proponents of GMOs do, Mr. Tuttle conveniently ignores the basic fact that GMO corn, soybeans and other crops have been engineered to withstand massive quantities of herbicides. This strategy is designed to maximize profits for chemical companies, such as Monsanto. The use of copious quantities of herbicides, including glyphosates, is losing its effectiveness and the producers of these poisons are promoting the use of increasingly dangerous substances to achieve the same results...

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · What‘s Best for...
. . . .

What‘s Best for Acme

Margy and Jim Goss - August 4th, 2005
(The following is a response to Governor Bill Milliken‘s guest opinion in last week‘s Express regarding an Aug. 2 vote on whether the Acme Township Board should go ahead with a nine-month moratorium on big box stores to study their impact on the township. -- ed.)

My husband and I are voting NO on the Acme Township moratorium this Tuesday, August 2 and want to tell you why.
We were born and raised in Traverse City, with family roots in Bates, Williamsburg, and Acme. We feel fortunate to have finally returned to Acme, year-round. For 31 summers, East Bay was our summer cottage destination, where our boys played with other Acme kids along Bay Valley Drive and Maitland Road, occasionally enjoyed Arne‘s Funland, and raced the bumper cars behind Don‘s Drive In. We felt like we had “come home“ when we added on and created our permanent residence here.
We wanted to do something special for Acme, as a way of giving back to the residents who have been such good stewards of the land. Our partners joined us in designing the most beautiful mixed-use village on 182 acres along the M-72 trunkline.
Perhaps you can imagine our surprise and dismay when ex-Governor Milliken gave what we felt were misleading impressions of excess in describing our project which includes a hotel, esplanade, shops and Meijer anchor store, TART Trail bike paths, senior housing, various types of residential housing to meet a continuum of economic needs, community and educational buildings,
recreation fields, and numerous entertainment venues.
The Village at Grand Traverse was designed to contain Milliken‘s predicted “sprawl“ over its 20 year build-out, and would have given “heart“ and economic synergy to Acme‘s Towne Center. That‘s why the previous Township Board twice granted us permission to build. And each time they did, the Concerned Citizens of Acme Township (CCAT) sued the township to obstruct our progress, hiding behind the courts and local judges rather than mediating to find common ground and a win-win for everyone.
Unfortunately, powerful special interest and non-profit groups are at work in Acme, such as CCAT, the Michigan Land Use Institute, Grand Traverse Land Conservancy, Grand Traverse Watershed, and NMEAC. They seem to want control of our land and waters for their own purposes. A Traverse City Smart Growth advocate has indicated Acme should be a rich bedroom community, like Grand Haven. If we lose this moratorium vote to the “yes“ side, we will never again have any say about future direction or growth in Acme. It will be visioned and mapped by Traverse City and regional interests to meet their needs, not ours.
If you‘re a property owner, taxpayer, or voter, beware of the advice our township board is taking from ex-CCAT lawyer, Chris Bzdok. The obstructive direction of this new board is opening our wallets to unjust taxation without compensation; the cry “Taxation without representation!“ is way too close to the truth!
Last August, only 50% of us were heard from at the polls. Please, let‘s make it 100% on August 2 and learn what Acme really wants. Vote “NO“ to welcome Meijer to Acme and discover what wonderful neighbors we all can be.

Mary and Jim Goss are part of the development team for the Village at Grand Traverse in Acme Township.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close