Letters

Letters 05-02-2016

Facts About Trails I would like to correct some misinformation provided in Kristi Kates’ article about the Shore-to-Shore Trail in your April 18 issue. The Shore-to-Shore Trail is not the longest continuous trail in the Lower Peninsula. That honor belongs to the North Country Trail (NCT), which stretches for over 400 miles in the Lower Peninsula. In fact, 100 miles of the NCT is within a 30-minute drive of Traverse City, and is maintained by the Grand Traverse Hiking Club...

North Korea Is Bluffing I eagerly read Jack Segal’s columns and attend his lectures whenever possible. However, I think his April 24th column falls into an all too common trap. He casually refers to a nuclear-armed North Korea when there is no proof whatever that North Korea has any such weapons. Sure, they have set off some underground explosions but so what? Tonga could do that. Every nuclear-armed country on Earth has carried out at least one aboveground test, just to prove they could do it if for no other reason. All we have is North Korea’s word for their supposed capabilities, which is no proof at all...

Double Dipping? In Greg Shy’s recent letter, he indicated that his Social Security benefit was being unfairly reduced simply due to the fact that he worked for the government. Somehow I think something is missing here. As I read it this law is only for those who worked for the government and are getting a pension from us generous taxpayers. Now Greg wants his pension and he also wants a full measure of Social Security benefits even though he did not pay into Social Security...

Critical Thinking Needed Our media gives ample coverage to some presidential candidates calling each other a liar and a sleaze bag. While entertaining to some, this certainly should lower one’s respect for either candidate. This race to the bottom comes as no surprise given their lack of respect for the rigors of critical thinking. The world’s esteemed scientists take great steps to preserve the integrity of their findings. Not only are their findings peer reviewed by fellow experts in their specialty, whenever possible the findings are cross-checked by independent studies...

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Why the President should...
. . . .

Why the President should meet with Cindy

George Foster - August 25th, 2005
Certainly, you believe Cindy Sheehan must be one brave woman for her recent confrontation in Crawford, Texas with the most powerful man on earth: George W. Bush. Or maybe you think her actions are akin to traitorous in the scathing verbal attacks she has levied on the policies and motives of a president while at war.
Tragically, Ms. Sheehan’s son is one of almost 2,000 American lives that have been lost in the Iraq conflict since 2003. Though Bush met with her immediately after her son’s death, she says she decided to demand another meeting when hearing President Bush say that our troops have died for a noble cause. “What is that noble cause my son was sacrificed for?” she reportedly has asked.
Sheehan had to know she would be subjected to personal attacks when she parked herself next to the President’s ranch until he agreed to meet with her. She had to know it is unlikely Bush would arrange a meeting since his administration is notorious for being ultra-insulated. What she couldn’t have bargained for was her resulting international celebrity status, the beginning of an emotional debate on the war in Iraq that had been relatively muted, and supportive anti-war groups popping up all over the U.S.
However you feel about Cindy Sheehan and George W. Bush, the President has no obligation to meet with her, again. Obviously, he can’t meet with everyone who makes such requests - even the first time around. The real issue, though, is what is the BEST response by our leader under these circumstances - a divided America in a war that seems subject to escalating violence by the day.
By contrast, Bill Clinton was never afraid of being trapped in a room with his adversaries. For example, you may remember that the former president had a meeting with hostile family members of Somalia War soldiers killed in the 1990’s. Some of that criticism of Clinton to his face was severe but he dealt with it like a man.
Can anyone imagine Ronald Reagan avoiding a mother who lost a son in battle, critic or not - especially if the war was initially waged on his watch. These presidents did not automatically run from their detractors, but often attempted to win them over with the convictions of their beliefs. A meeting between Bush and Sheehan might even go a long way toward healing the division in our country that the Iraqi conflict has inflamed.
Even though Ms. Sheehan left Crawford today (8/19/05) for an illness in her family, the damage has been done. As a result of refusing to meet with Sheehan, Bush has turned his five-week retreat in Crawford, Texas into a political nightmare for Republicans and the war effort. Before Sheehan’s camp-out, the mounting statistics of deaths in Iraq were just that for most of us: statistics. Sheehan’s vigil has put some human faces on the numbers - a grieving, angry mother and her deceased son, Casey.
Reports of our vacationing President clearing brush on the ranch, setting up cycling outings with celebrities and friends, all between high-speed fund-raising trips past the commemorative grave markers placed by protestors are a public relations disaster for the administration and our country’s image as a whole. And these problems might be small compared to the potential backlash our war effort would suffer if military families begin to take exception to relentless attacks against the character of a grieving military mother.
That is why the President should meet with Cindy Sheehan. If Mr. Bush made good on his promise to “be a uniter, not a divider”, Cindy Sheehan and others might stay home in support of their mourning families where they belong.




 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close