Letters

Letters 04-14-14

Benishek Inching

Regarding “Benishek No Environmentalist” I agree with Mr. Powell’s letter to the editor/ opinion of Congressman Dan Benishek’s poor environmental record and his penchant for putting corporate interests ahead of his constituents’...

Climate Change Warning

Currently there are three assaults on climate change. The first is on the integrity of the scientists who support human activity in climate change. Second is that humans are not capable of affecting the climate...

Fed Up About Roads

It has gotten to the point where I cringe when I have to drive around this area. There are areas in Traverse City that look like a war zone. When you have to spend more time viewing potholes instead on concentrating on the road, accidents are bound to happen...

Don’t Blame the IRS

I have not heard much about the reason for the IRS getting itself entangled with the scrutiny of certain conservative 501(c) groups (not for profit) seeking tax exemption. Groups seeking tax relief must be organizations that are operated “primarily for the purpose of bringing about civic betterment and social improvements.”


Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · Why you should support...
. . . .

Why you should support TC‘s parking deck

Matt Schmidt - June 8th, 2006
Open fields, streams and forests; these are the reasons to support economically viable and compact development in Traverse City.
Families and individuals are coming to Northern Michigan. As people visit or move into our region, development of houses and business will follow. The question becomes how does this development take shape, and this is at core of why we should support the retail, housing and parking proposal at 145 West Front Street.
We have choices in what we offer: Do we offer compact homes and condos in our city, or new subdivisions spread across acres and acres in neighboring townships? Similarly, the cars driving into our downtown will be stacked in a deck, or spread across acres of asphalt.
I support the efficient use of our land and city infrastructure, rather than paving our forests and farm fields. Redeveloping our city center, 145 West Front Street included, promotes sustainable growth an economic manner.
Why does the thoroughly-researched development from Federated Properties at 145 West Front deserve support? This development . . .

...does not require funding from our city’s General Fund.
$7.8 million in Brownfield (BRA) and MI Economic Growth (MEGA) funding and $1.2 million DEQ grant dollars will pay for more than half of the deck and public infrastructure. TIF revenue covers the remaining public costs under even very conservative estimates.
These public funds are designated specifically to 145 West Front at a local and state level.
It would be very difficult, at best, to transfer to an alternate site and to do so would mean time, money and risk.

...brings $18 million in taxable city value.
The Snowden conceptual plan discussed offers half this amount in the initial phase. The funds from the state and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) are dependent on taxable value. Without a contractual commitment for full funding it is unwise to build a publicly owned parking deck. The Federated Properties development contract has this taxable value commitment. The key to funding a compact and sustainable city downtown hinges on taxable value.

...revitalizes a polluted site with state funding support.
This project will clean up contaminates leaching into our groundwater. This desolate asphalt lot in the heart of our city will become a revitalized block of retail business and housing. It will not impact the riverfront, or be built on a flood plain, as in other concepts discussed.

...respects the public input collected and due process.
The 145 West Front Street site follows the City Master Plan, BRA and MEGA plans, TIF plan. These plans are the result of countless volunteer hours from Traverse City citizens reviewing, analyzing and planning our city as we would like it to be. With public funds involved, due process is important. The first public meetings regarding this deck were held more than one year ago in the spring of 2005. Over the last 12 months many Traverse City people spent countless hours providing ideas and opinions incorporated into the plan. To ignore this would be to ignore the open and public process.

In closing, this is an excellent opportunity for our community to promote sound economic growth. The decision to move forward was an open process, with the finances and welfare of Traverse City as the sole motivation. To say otherwise is simply not true, and is not supported by any of the facts. Please join in this important community discussion to keep our city and region on the right track because it is our community as a whole that will decide the future.

Matt Schmidt is a member of the Traverse City Commission.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close