Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · News · NATURAL GAS BLUES
. . . .


None - August 19th, 2011  
Lawsuits abound a year after the boom went bust

Jan Stuhlmann at his rural Kalkaska County home. He received an empty promise to drill for natural gas on his land. Photo by Patrick Sullivan.

When Jan Stuhlmann heard how much a company wanted to pay him for oil and gas rights to his 80 acres in Kalkaska County, he couldn’t believe his ears.

The 69-year-old and his wife stood to receive around $140,000.

For Stuhlmann, a retired community college pottery instructor and carpenter who’s lived in the same house on North Crooked Lake in Blue Lake Township with his wife, Janet, since 1973, the windfall would have been life-altering.

“I mean, I’d buy a Cadillac, maybe I would even get her a diamond ring,” he said, motioning toward Janet.

He signed the papers right away that would give the company the right to drill for natural gas on his property.

Many of his neighbors across Northern Michigan, especially in Kalkaska, Antrim, Emmet, Otsego, Charlevoix, Cheboygan and Crawford counties, also signed during the whirlwind natural gas rights grab last July.

Then the dates they were supposed to receive their checks came. And went. And many received nothing.

Perhaps the whole thing seemed too good to be true all along.

“It sounded real good, but of course, we got zero,” Stuhlmann said. “They seemed like a bunch of crooks to begin with, ... for them to come out and offer you that much money.”


Now, a year later, the Stuhlmanns and dozens upon dozens of other Northern Michigan landowners are in legal battles with Chesapeake Energy Corp. and related companies over contested oil and gas leases.

In court houses across the region, case files grow and legal documents stack up in the cases.

Many of the plaintiffs are represented by Susan Hlywa Topp, a Gaylord attorney who specializes in environmental and natural resource law. She’s filed for around 130 of the landowners who believe they were hoodwinked by Chesapeake.

Topp argues in the lawsuits that Chesapeake came into Northern Michigan when suspicion was rampant that there was a fortune worth of natural gas in a geological formation called the Collingwood Shale. Energy companies sought to buy up rights to as much land as possible. The Collingwood Shale is a natural gas deposit that runs through much of Northern Michigan.

…in some rural areas, there were so many landmen driving around on dirt roads, the dust never settled. “It was crazy, it was absolutely a rodeo,” said former landman David Petty. And then it was over. Boom. Done. And everybody else paid. The other companies, they all honored their obligations.”

While those deals were pending, however, Topp said the company drilled test wells with disappointing results -- natural gas from the formation would be tougher to get out than originally thought.

The companies then resolved to get out of as many leases as possible by alleging fault with the titles, Topp said.

It amounted, Topp says, to shifting the risk of oil and gas speculation to the landowners, who were forced to turn down offers from other companies once they signed with Chesapeake.

“They were treating the oil and gas leases as an option which would shift the risk to the lessor; they were not treating the leases as a binding contract,” she said. “And when they didn’t like the results that came in, they tried to get out of the leases by saying ‘we never really accepted them.’” Topp goes into great detail about Chesapeake’s business practices in the lawsuits and says there is more at stake in the claims than just money.

“Simply stated, this case involves unconscionable corporate wrongdoing resulting in financial injury to many people who contracted in good faith with the Defendant’s representatives,” she writes in the introduction to some of the lawsuits. “Much more than the merit of the Plaintiffs’ claim is at stake here. At stake is the integrity of the Michigan contract.”


Those allegations go too far, one Chesapeake attorney says.

The lawsuits are about nothing more than contract disputes and the plaintiffs will not be able to prove Chesapeake or any of the other companies committed fraud, said Steven Barney, a Petoskey attorney who is among those representing Chesapeake and its affiliates.

In fact, Barney said, one case in Charlevoix County was already tossed by a judge at a summary disposition hearing on those grounds, though Barney would not discus specifics about that case.

“In our opinion, these are alleged breach of contract cases, that’s what they’re really about,” Barney said. “Our clients, through their land folks here in Michigan, went out to people and negotiated leases. And when they negotiate a lease, part of that initial agreement to pay a bonus to conclude a lease involves a review of the title, and if there are defects ... we have a right to reject it. And in all of these cases, that’s what we did.”

Barney said if the grounds for finding fault with some of the titles seems severe, that’s because in these cases the companies were paying so much more per acre for the natural gas rights than is typical. They merely acted with added diligence.

“It’s a pure contract case, in our opinion, and if we owe them money, we’ll pay it,” Barney said.

Topp said she is aware of a Charlevoix County case that was dismissed, but that case was in district court, it was handled by an attorney who does not specialize in oil and gas law, and did not contain allegations of fraud.


If you knew where to look, Northern Michigan began to resemble an oil rush beginning in April 2010 through last August when the boom went bust. The region was crawling with hundreds of landmen visiting land owners, pitching deals and checking titles in register of deeds offices.

David Petty, who worked as a landman for six years and says he is now blackballed by the industry for speaking out against Chesapeake, said that in some rural areas, there were so many landmen driving around on dirt roads, the dust never settled.

“It was crazy, it was absolutely a rodeo,” Petty said of the rush of seven or eight companies which came when the industry suspected the region might be the site of the nation’s next natural gas boom after a promising well was drilled in Missaukee County. “And then it was over.

Boom. Done. And everybody else paid. The other companies, they all honored their obligations.”

Petty said Chesapeake was the lone holdout that tried to get out of honoring leases.

Chesapeake was unusual even before then, Petty said, because most companies settled on a per-acre price they would pay and stuck with it. Chesapeake last year offered anything between $200 and $2,000 per acre, Petty said, because they wanted the leases so badly.

Petty said many of the people who entered into deals with Chesapeake wound up suffering harm after they didn’t get the money they expected.

“A lot of people went out and bought things, expecting a check to come in. They went out and re-mortgaged their houses, they bought new combines,” Petty said. “And wham-o: Chesapeake said, ‘We’re not paying you.’” Petty was among the landowners who signed with Chesapeake, though his deal only involved 12 acres, he said, much less than most of the lessors.

Petty plans to form an advocacy group to advise people how to deal with oil and gas companies the next time they come around. The group would offer legal advice and help landowners understand some of the pitfalls that can come up when oil and gas companies send landmen out to comb the countryside.


Details of what happened last summer have emerged in some of the court files.

Topp said the Stuhlmann case is representative of the cases filed across Northern Michigan, though some of the company names are different in other cases.

The Stuhlmanns first received a letter from an agent representing a company called Silver Lake Energy, LLC. Most of the plaintiffs first dealt with a company called Western Land Services Inc., Topp said.

Silver Lake, saying it was acting as an agent for the Northern Michigan Exploration Co., LLC, said they wanted to make a “very attractive offer” and the “best available offer” for oil and gas rights.

The Stuhlmanns were contacted by an agent from Silver Lake in July 2010, according to the lawsuit. Silver Lake offered a contract to lease the Stuhlmanns’ property for $1,750 an acre, a figure to which they agreed, and they signed a lease on July 14. They expected to be paid a bonus of around $140,000 for mineral rights to their land.

The money was owed by Sept. 17, 2010, according to the lawsuit.

Then the September date came and went.

A message left for an attorney who is listed as Silver Lake’s agent was not returned. Messages left with Chesapeake’s public relations office were also unreturned.


In September 2010, a company connected to Chesapeake hired several oil and gas landmen to find grounds to void the leases, according to an affidavit filed in Topp’s lawsuits signed by one of those landmen, Kevin Koonce.

The Stuhlmanns received a letter dated Nov. 18, 2010 saying that the Northern Michigan Exploration Co. would void the lease, “because of an unreleased title defect to wit: Unreleased Oil and Gas Lease in favor of Steven H. Anderson dated May 1, 1996 and that you do not own the 80 acres in minerals as represented at the time of leasing.”

Topp argues in the lawsuit that the oil and gas company defendants did not make those objections before the Sept. 17 closing deadline.

On the issue of an unreleased claim, Topp says that “is totally and absolutely without merit.” The Anderson lease was for a period of three years and expired under its own terms on May 1, 1999. There’s no duty under Michigan law for there to be filed a “release of lease,” according to the lawsuit.

Further, Topp argues, Northern Michigan Exploration never provided specifics to prove its claim that the Stuhlmann’s own fewer than 80 acres and the lease provides for an adjustment in the size of the amount of land leased should the actual acreage prove to me more or less than what was originally agreed to.

The statewide average for title failure for oil and gas leases is around eight percent, Topp argues. Alleged title failure in deals involving Chesapeake is over 80 percent, she said.

“I wouldn’t say we suffered any hardship other than going to the mailbox everyday and being disappointed that the check wasn’t in the mail,” Stuhlmann says.

Barney said he didn’t want to discuss details of any particular lawsuit but he denied the allegations in general. In an answer to the lawsuit, Chesapeake attorneys deny the allegations.


One lawsuit against Chesapeake filed in Grand Traverse County dwarfs the suits brought by individual landowners.

Frontier Energy, a Traverse City company, says in the suit that it owned the oil and gas rights to parcels of land in Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Crawford, Kalkaska and Otsego counties and was approached by a company called O.I.L. Niagara L.L.C. to lease the rights on behalf of a large energy company, which during the negotiations was anonymous.

The company paid Frontier $10 million to lease the rights and agreed to pay an additional $24 million at closing.

A lawsuit, originally filed in Charlevoix County in August, 2010 and moved to Grand Traverse County, charges that O.I.L. failed to pay the $24 million and instead claimed the agreement was broken and void because the companies couldn’t manage to negotiate terms.

Chesapeake, the anonymous company, was later added as a defendant in the suit along with Northern Michigan Exploration Company, L.L.C. The defendants countersued and they have asked Frontier to return the $10 million.

Attorneys for O.I.L. and Chesapeake said in court filings that this case is not like the others, even aside from the large amount of money involved.

“This is a very straight forward commercial contract case between two sophisticated and knowledgeable oil and gas companies. In that regard, it is significantly different from the other cases in Northern Michigan to which Frontier continues to attempt to draw the Court’s attention,” one of the attorneys wrote. “It is very unlikely that any other leases or disputes will be relevant to resolution of this case.”

An attorney for Frontier did not return a message seeking comment.

The case is scheduled for trial at the end of November.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5