Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Features · Do It Yourself Windpower
. . . .

Do It Yourself Windpower

Kerry Krcek - February 23rd, 2006
I have been generating all my electricity for my home and my small wood shop for the last 25 years. I generate my electric power by means of a small wind machine and solar panels (photovoltaic). My home is located on a high ridge in the center of Leelanau County, five-seven miles from Lake Michigan.
I envision that someday we could have small communities around the country collectively owning and operating their own wind machines which could serve the energy needs of 200-1,000 people. People within these communities could be hired to maintain and operate these community-owned sources of energy.
The new technology of wind generators does not require hundreds of them in one confined location. There is no need for wind machines to become visual obstructions or noise hazards.
As you drive on M-72 from Empire to Traverse City, notice the one lone wind machine with 75 foot blades standing only 150 feet above the ground. This machine is hardly obstructing the view, especially compared to the 1,000-foot radio towers nearby. Stop your car and roll down the window; if you’re lucky, you might hear soft whispers coming from this non-polluting, renewable-energy source. (Similar windmills are found on I-75 just outside Mackinaw City.)

200-400 HOMES
Due to innovations in wind technology, machines like the Vesta in Leelanau County are high energy producers and low in noise.The Vesta owned by Traverse Light & Power provides enough electricity to serve 200 homes. This same machine serves 400 homes in Europe.
If we develop State and Federal tax incentives to establish community-owned wind machines, and educate communities on how they can invest in sustainable energy and have ownership of their energy, then costs could in time be reversed.
The utility-owned wind machine orginally cost 200 participating home owners an additional 1.5 cents per kilowatt more than their neighbors who get their power from coal, oil and nuclear plants. Yet, after four years paying this increased price, the utility would own this wind machine outright. Think about that! Your community could own its own power-generating machine in four years with minimal sacrifice in cost. And from then on the cost of electricity would drop significantly.

These wind machines can be placed in high energy producing areas that aren’t necessarily going to obstruct our view.
I realize that our visual models are
wind farms in California. These wind farms are outdated by new technology. The California wind farms were from an early period in wind exploration. There were lots of small wind machines, and yes they did make noise. There were hundreds on ridge tops in very close proximity.
Yet there is no need to put hundreds of machines next to each other for miles along the coasts of the Great Lakes. A dozen Vestas like the one in Traverse City could provide power for 2,000-6,000 homes.
We cannot afford to continue wasting energy selfishly. The impact that we are having on our own lives and those of our children by blind consumption has to become our most precious concern. Using coal and oil and nuclear fuels to generate electricity creates such potential for devastation to our health and well being for the planet and all species on this earth.
What is needed is a distribution of power by government and the large utilities back in to the hands of the people - to the collective community - which I do believe would be a much truer sense of democracy, driven by our collective needs.

Going it Alone

Generating your own wind power is still a pricey proposition, but if you’re committed to renewable energy, the resources are out there.
The Bergey Windpower Company in windy Oklahoma, for instance, sells a broad range of wind machines designed for rural homes, remote villages, eco-tourism resorts, farms and other applications.
According to the company, the BWC Excel model pictured here is, “a modern 6.7 meter (22 ft.) diameter, 10,000 Watt wind turbine designed for high reliability, low maintenance, and automatic operation in adverse weather conditions. It is available in two configurations: battery charging and grid-connected.”
Home wind systems typically charge a bank of batteries for those times when the breeze declines to blow. Conversely, when it’s blowing like a tornado, your surplus power can be uploaded to the nation’s power grid (but check with your local power company on the do’s and don’t’s involved).
Wind turbines start at just $2,450 for a 1kW machine suitable for a cottage. But the more useable 7.5 or 10kW machines run around $20,000-$25,000. Then there is the cost of the tower, batteries and incidentals... it all gets back to how committed your wallet is to renewable energy and rugged individualism.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5