Letters

Letters 09-26-2016

Welcome To 1984 The Democrat Party, the government education complex, private corporations and foundations, the news media and the allpervasive sports and entertainment industry have incrementally repressed the foundational right of We the People to publicly debate open borders, forced immigration, sanctuary cities and the calamitous destruction of innate gender norms...

Grow Up, Kachadurian Apparently Tom Kachadurian has great words; too bad they make little sense. His Sept. 19 editorial highlights his prevalent beliefs that only Hillary and the Dems are engaged in namecalling and polarizing actions. Huh? What rock does he live under up on Old Mission...

Facts MatterThomas Kachadurian’s “In the Basket” opinion deliberately chooses to twist what Clinton said. He chooses to argue that her basket lumped all into the clearly despicable categories of the racist, sexist, homophobic , etc. segments of the alt right...

Turn Off Fox, Kachadurian I read Thomas Kachadurian’s opinion letter in last week’s issue. It seemed this opinion was the product of someone who offered nothing but what anyone could hear 24/7/365 on Fox News; a one-sided slime job that has been done better by Fox than this writer every day of the year...

Let’s Fix This Political Process Enough! We have been embroiled in the current election cycle for…well, over a year, or is it almost two? What is the benefit of this insanity? Exorbitant amounts of money are spent, candidates are under the microscope day and night, the media – now in action 24/7 – focuses on anything and everything anyone does, and then analyzes until the next event, and on it goes...

Can’t Cut Taxes 

We are in a different place today. The slogan, “Making America Great Again” begs the questions, “great for whom?” and “when was it great?” I have claimed my generation has lived in a bubble since WWII, which has offered a prosperity for a majority of the people. The bubble has burst over the last few decades. The jobs which provided a good living for people without a college degree are vanishing. Unions, which looked out for the welfare of employees, have been shrinking. Businesses have sought to produce goods where labor is not expensive...

Wrong About Clinton In response to Thomas Kachadurian’s column, I have to take issue with many of his points. First, his remarks about Ms. Clinton’s statement regarding Trump supporters was misleading. She was referring to a large segment of his supporters, not all. And the sad fact is that her statement was not a “smug notion.” Rather, it was the sad truth, as witnessed by the large turnout of new voters in the primaries and the ugly incidents at so many of his rallies...

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters 6/26/03
. . . .

Letters 6/26/03

Various - June 26th, 2003
Our soiled flag in Charlevoix

Who knows why, but Charlevoix, an otherwise pleasantly laid-back waterside village has lately bloomed into a belligerently nationalistic town, its main street bristling with American flags. Moreover, lest there be any doubt of the village‘s seething chauvinism, nearly all businesses are festooned with one and often two additional flags, their hems embroidered with the slogan, “Proud to be American.“
But wait! There‘s more! The local market features bags of potatoes featuring Old Glory and advising patriotic customers that therein are potatoes, GROWN IN AMERICA, by golly! Never mind that our country‘s flag is being soiled by sacks full of potato dust and dirt.
Yessiree! When the spirit of chauvinism gripped this villlage, the tidal wave of excessive and unreasonable patriotism washed away any respect for the living soul of our county, our stars and bars. In one supermarket, they even stacked layers of paper American flags among the flotsam of the check-out counters. So help me, I saw a beer-bellied citizen in the same market sporting a t-shirt with our country‘s flag on the front, the white stripes that symbolize purity, now sticking out soiled on his distended gut.
God Bless America?

John R. Alberts • Charlevoix

Casting the first stone

Your column regarding the stoning of Amina Lawal mentioned some repressive Michigan Statutes. Here‘s a little known statute that remains Michigan Law. MCL 750.32 states:
“COHABITATION BY DIVORCED PARTIES -- If any persons after being divorced from the bonds of matrimony for any cause whatever, shall cohabit together, they shall be liable to all the penalties provided by law against adultery.“
That is a felony punishable by up to four years in prison. So is the crime of abortion.

Bruce Laidlaw • via email

‘Appalled‘ by gay people

On June 12th, the California Assembly passed a Father‘s Day pro-homosexual resolution by a vote of 42-24. Twenty-four Republicans voted against this resolution. It praised fatherhood, but also supported “families headed by two fathers.“ The resolution was offered by lesbian San Diego Assemblywoman Christine Kehoe.
This resolution is clearly designed to promote the homosexual agenda -- and to be used by homosexual activists as a way of redefining the family. A family in both law and history consists of a mother, father, and children (either by birth or adoption). This resolution is wrong and must be condemned.
Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, head of Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) and TVC lobbyist Ben Lopez have sent out a press release protesting this blatant misuse of Father‘s Day to promote the normalization of homosexuality in California. In the release, Rev. Sheldon said, “I am appalled that these
Democrats in the legislature claim that their actions are not part of a concerted homosexual agenda.“ Lopez correctly observed: “Californians need to realize that anything proposed by any of the openly-homosexual members of the Assembly, like Kehoe, is part of a larger agenda to equate their sexual lifestyle with that of marriage and to redefine the very term family.“
This is a shameful action on the part of Democrats in the Assembly and should be condemned by their constituents.

Scott A. Labash • Bear Lake

The statistics of murder

I am responding to a letter that appeared in your paper in the May 29 issue entitled “Liberate our citizens“ by Todd M Jordan. He stated that there were “15,517 citizens murdered in the year 2000, compared to 9,110 in the ‘60s. That is an increase in crime my friend.“
My first reaction when I read that was that it might even be a decrease in the percentage of murders. We‘re talking a period of time of 30-40 years from the ‘60s to the year 2000, and the population today is much greater.
The July 1 census for 1960 was 180,671,158 and the July 1, 1999 census was 272,690,813, an increase of a little over 92 million people! So, of course you‘re going to see a greater number of murders in 2000 than in the ‘60s.
Since the letter said there were 9,110 murders in the ‘60s, I assume it meant that approximately 9,000+ people were murdered every year. I rounded all the numbers off to make it easier. I calculated that one in every 21,555 people were murdered in 1965 compared to one in 18,133 murdered in 1999. I thought Mr. Jordan and Express readers would like to know.
P. Cassidy • Petoskey

Corrections:
Last week‘s article about singer/songwriter Don Swan had the wrong phone number. The correct number is 933-5206.

An article about summer theater in the Super Summer Guide had a problem with improperly juxtaposed copy. The play “Footloose“ will be performed at the Milliken Auditorium, ph. 231-995-1553. “Anton in Show Business“ will be performed at Interlochen.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close