Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · The Euphoria of Rising...
. . . .

The Euphoria of Rising Gas Prices

George Foster - June 21st, 2007
Driving to work last week, I noticed several service stations reduced their price for regular gasoline from $3.49 to $3.29. The next day it dropped to $3.19. Talk about bad news. My depression has not lifted a week later.
You see, I become overjoyed whenever I see those little numbers representing gas prices on station signs go up-up-up. Each day I give little pep talks from my car, “Don’t stop now, Speedway old buddy, way up there. “You can do it, Shell, charge me more. “Come on Marathon - higher, higher.”
Significant long-term jumps in prices cause most Americans to get serious about energy conservation, whether we want to or not. I do realize increased gas prices have resulted in financial hardships for many families and businesses of late. Believe me, I have not been spared, but overall it is worth the short-term pain.
If for no other reason, you should join me in clamoring for higher prices because reduced fuel usage means less dependence on foreign oil imports. The U.S. now purchases 63% of our oil from foreign countries (and rising). None of us relishes being held hostage by Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, who believe they can wreck our economy instantly by temporarily shutting off their oil spigots. And you think prices are high now?
Venezuela’s leader Hugo Chavez may hate President Bush but Saudi Arabia would never pull the plug on us, you say? Don’t forget that our Saudi “friends” use oil revenues to fund Madrasah Islamic schools that teach hatred for the West. Also, I don’t need to remind you that 15 of the 19 September 11th hijackers were from Saudi Arabia (none were from Iraq). Whose oil money do you think continues to indirectly fund Middle East terrorist plots against the U.S.?
We should also celebrate our journey to $5 per gallon gas and higher because Americans tend to buy more fuel-efficient vehicles when these prices are high. In recent years, even I have begun to see the light and sold my beloved SUV. Still, the replacement Subaru only gets 27 mpg - at best. My next vehicle purchased should be a retooled GM or Ford product that burns only half as much fuel. Are you listening Detroit?
So much for progress; the typical car in the U.S. now gets around 25 mpg compared to 26 mpg for the average auto 20 years ago. Since it is estimated that an average of 45 mpg would allow the U.S. to completely eliminate our dependence on foreign oil, the importance of dramatically improved fuel efficiency in the near future is obvious.
Additionally, high gas prices encourage people to use their vehicles less. A reduced amount of vehicles on the road result in less traffic jams, fewer accidents, and lower air pollution. Will you now join me in praying for higher prices at the pump?
Award-winning author Thomas Friedman has a plan that adds an additional gasoline tax of 50 cents per gallon to ensure that prices do not go back down. His reasoning is that Americans will break their oil addiction and businesses will produce more environmentally friendly products if they believe energy prices will not fall over the long haul. The additional tax revenue would then be used for such things as paying down the federal deficit and the development of renewable energy.
In 1980 President Carter put solar panels on the White House and proposed a 60-cent a gallon gasoline tax. He was, of course, defeated in the 1980 presidential race. During the 1990s President Clinton suggested a tax to promote fuel-efficient cars and general energy conservation. As usual, Congress snickered as it instantly dismissed any notion of higher taxes.
I don’t hear anyone laughing now. The only guarantee is that the next President and V-P will not be former oil executives. But will any Presidential candidate be brave enough to advocate an increased gasoline tax?
None of the major candidates have seriously discussed the topic of oil independence and conservation to date. Many of the Republicans have yet to discovery we have an energy problem. The Democrats don’t have enough backbone to bring up “taxes” (s-h-h-h-h, don’t say that word) in the middle of a Presidential campaign.
The only viable candidate (and he is not running at the moment) pushing for a new gasoline tax is Al Gore. His idea is to tax pollution, not payroll. In Gore’s plan, the additional tax revenue from gasoline would replace payroll taxes that all employees pay to Uncle Sam.
Does it add-up to pay more at the pump to ensure a bigger paycheck (less withholding) and increased energy conservation? Yes and it makes sense to vote for Al Gore in 2008 or any Republican or Democratic Presidential candidate who favors a policy embracing higher gasoline prices.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close