Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letter 8/23/07
. . . .

Letter 8/23/07

- August 23rd, 2007
Testing for safety
The current hullabaloo over imports from China is frustrating to watch. It has led to calls to ban all imports from China, set up new systems to test incoming products, and generally given politicians way too much opportunity for mindless blathering and calls for expensive or impossible safety measures.
We cannot afford to test all incoming products, and we cannot ban imports from China. A system exists right now to assure safe and effective products from all countries, and it does not cost the U.S. taxpayer anything.
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Conformity Assessment Committee, the International Accreditation Forum (IAF), and the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) have established a system of standards and processes to verify the competence of producers and to test these products for safety and proper function (depending whether the product is food, toys, pharmaceuticals, telephones or automobiles).
This system is in place now, and accreditors in most countries (including the U.S. and China) are following the rigorous process of accreditation to international standards, peer-assessment, and mutual promotion of the agreement. The system has been endorsed by the World Trade Organization, the United Nations, the World Health Organization, the International Electrotechnical Commission, and a host of other respected global organizations. Further details can be obtained from www.ilac.org.
What is needed is to have bulk customers (not consumers) require that the producers they buy from must be certified for manufacture of the product, and that the product must be tested for compliance to specific requirements by an accredited laboratory.
In the recent very visible cases, the pet food, toy, and pharmaceutical manufacturers did not demand that the products be tested by an accredited laboratory, or that the manufacturers be certified for the products they were selling. If the customers had demanded certification and accredited testing, these manufacturers would have obtained it from their government or other organizations (it varies by country). Such verification is mandatory only in Europe for some products, but almost everywhere else it is voluntary. Note that the consumer cannot do this; it is the responsibility of the bulk purchasers.
Trillions of dollars in products and services are being traded under this system, and it works. It is working not just to assure safety and that products work, but it also works to reduce the enormous amount of wasted products – Syrian oranges that arrive in Europe and must be dumped at sea because they do not meet local standards; Volkswagens that are produced for the US market but can’t be sold because they fail EPA emissions tests; Mattel toys that must be disposed as toxic waste. The examples and dollars involved every year are mind-boggling, but usually they are not publicly reported..
Anyone buying anything for resale has an obligation to require verification of competence of the supplier, and the conformity of the product to specified criteria. Purchasing on the basis of price alone only leads to unfortunate news stories.

Dan Tholen • TC

The real culprit...
I was an honors student in philosophy during college, and did extensive research in the philosophy of science during my studies.
One of the conclusions I came to in these studies is how much of modern scientific knowledge is labeled as “fact” by the general public, when in reality the knowledge should be labeled as “theory.” Among the bodies of knowledge we should be careful to label as “theory” are evolution, the “Big Bang,” and of course global warming.
The only “true” knowledge anyone has is personal experience. If you saw something happen, then to you, it is true. All other information about the world, if you did not personally see it happen, must be accepted on the basis of faith that the source of the information is valid. Additionally, one must also recognize the limitations of human language to describe occurrences in the physical world. People often see the same thing but describe it differently. In certain disciplines, such as chemistry, we can be confident that scientists have faithfully communicated the results of experimentation to the public. The results can also be seen in applications such as the creation of fuels, plastics, building materials, and so forth.
On the other hand, it is impossible to test certain theories because we cannot go back in time to make the necessary observations. The theory of evolution is a perfect example, as no one was around three billion years ago to observe an amoeba growing legs and crawling out of the primordial soup. Similarly, we do not have scientific measurements of weather conditions dating back more than 150 years or so. The only truth about global warming is that there has been an increase in average global temperatures in recent years. As to the causes of this increase, we cannot draw definite conclusions because our data is so limited. We can speculate on the reasons and begin testing, of course, but most scientists will tell you the verdict is not yet in.
Personally, I believe greenhouse gas emissions do play a part in the recent rise in average temperatures, but I would also point out that deforestation in Brazil and tropical Africa are probably doing thousands of times more harm to global climate patterns than auto exhaust in industrialized nations and people burning wood to keep warm in the third world. Also, we’re just one large volcanic eruption away from reverting back to a much colder climate, and one cataclysmic solar burst away from being burned to a cinder.
In closing, I would caution everyone to recognize the uncertainties involved in scientific theory, and refrain from ignorantly labeling certain theories as “fact.” I would bet anything the real culprit in global warming is deforestation, but I hear little or nothing about this in the media or in the hysterical pronunciations of people like Al Gore and Sheryl Crow.

Ken Carter • TC
Last week’s story on Marlin’s House of Brews in Frankfort had a number of errors:
• Andrew, the husband of Courtney Miller-Lamb, is the manager of A. Papano’s in Frankfort, not the owner.
• Andrea Randolph and Tom Metes are the owners of Marlin’s. Andrea is renting the building which houses the business.
• Courtney Miller-Lamb is the manager of Marlin’s, not the owner.
• Marlin’s hours are 8-3, not 8-4.
• There are no plans for a Halloween party this year.
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5