Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Too smart for our own...
. . . .

Too smart for our own good?

Robert Downes - April 7th, 2008
Too Smart for Our Own Good?
There’s a new gadget on the market which promises to revolutionize the way we read books.
Or, to put it more simply, it promises to destroy books. Forever.
The Kindle, from Amazon.com, is a reading tablet the size of a paperback book which has a high-resolution display screen that’s easy enough on the eyes to be considered “electronic paper.”
Using wireless technology, owners of the Kindle can download books, newspapers and magazines over a “Whispernet” service on their cellphones. And publications are available for half the price -- or less -- compared to the printed versions.
Thus, within a matter of a few seconds, you can download “Gone With the Wind” or the Chicago Tribune for half the price. You can also upsize the text on your screen, making your selection easier to read.
Sounds nice, doesn’t it? Except that once these electronic tablets catch on, there will be no more need for books on paper. And of course, that will most likely mean the end of bookstores, which will be outgunned by the cut-rate price of downloading. Who knows? Perhaps even the end of libraries in a generation or two, since all books will be digital, and easily accessed from home.
But if such a disaster comes to pass, it will also mean a more spiritually impoverished world, because we will have lost the communal experience of browsing at bookstores and libraries. Seeing your friends, thumbing through books, and sharing good feelings at the great social institution of the bookstore could become a thing of the past.
Oh, books won’t disappear, even if there’s a Kindle under every Christmas tree for the next decade. They’ll simply become drastically-downsized “boutique” items, like LP records are today -- perhaps crafted on handmade paper, and sold in precious little “shoppes” for the benefit of a few eccentric collectors.
What will disappear, however, will be millions of jobs in the lumber industry, paper recycling, papermaking, book manufacturing, distribution, delivery and sales of books.
Where will the people go who worked at those jobs? The same place as those who’ve been replaced by automation, industrial robots, digital outsourcing, and other technological advances that experts say are draining America of far more jobs than NAFTA or globalization.
Is that too complicated? Then ask yourself, where did the cashiers go at Meijer’s, Home Depot and a growing number of stores that have been replaced by automated checkout counters?
Ask yourself where you are going to go.
Experts in labor and productivity warn that automation is gobbling up jobs all over the earth, from the United States to Japan to India -- no nation is immune
Robert Reich, the secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, noted that the period from 2001-2003 represented “The longest job-market downturn since the Great Depression (and things have gone even worse since 2003). “Add in productivity gains that have been growing much faster than the economy, especially in technology sectors, and you’ve got even less need for labor,” Reich adds. “Machines can do more.”
It’s also now commonplace to move American jobs “offshore,” thanks to digital technology. Thus, it’s possible for radiologists in India to read the X-ray charts of patients in Northern Michigan.
In 2007, Alan Blinder, former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, estimated that “somewhere between 22 percent and 29 percent of all U.S. jobs are or will be potentially offshorable within a decade or two.”
And in 2003, economist Paul Roberts, who served as an assistant secretary of the Treasury during the Reagan administration, predicted that America will become a Third World country within 20 years unless we get a handle on the destruction and outsourcing of jobs.
But why worry? Because we’re the helpmates of our own destruction.
The music CD, which seemed so fresh and new 15 years ago, is about to become extinct. Everyone downloads their music digitally now. Rolling Stone magazine reports that 40% of teenagers didn’t buy a single CD last year -- imagine that. So, we’ve said farewell to many great music stores: Harmony House, Virgin Records, Tower Records... soon there won’t be any.
And we’ll say farewell to millions of jobs in the CD industry, not to mention the music business, deliveries, stores, advertising.... For sure, the digital express is no gravy train for musicians, pumping their tunes into the endless void of MySpace or YouTube... As at Amazon.com, a few guys plugged into their computers will be able to take over the jobs of millions, thanks to digital technology.
Newspapers? Same deal. Our industry is doing its damnedest to destroy itself as quickly as possible by buying into a greed-driven scheme in hopes that the Internet will reap zillions of dollars at some distant date down the road for papers that build the “perfect” website that readers can’t live without. Fat chance.
Meanwhile, newspapers are hemorrhaging employees -- particularly the reporters who bring home the bacon of what the news is all about. The New York Times is cutting 100 newsroom jobs this year -- eight percent of its editorial staff -- and the Times is widely considered to have the best newspaper website in the nation.
Newspaper publishers have yet to figure out what every brothel madame knows: if you give it away free out the back door, the paying customers fade away.
Jobs go away, but people don’t. And the pain of living without a job is amplified in an affluent society where it now costs $170 a week to put groceries on the table for a family of four, not to mention $50 or more in the gas tank.
So, gadget lovers, consider this: the next time you download a song, a book or a film, chances are you’re helping to put someone else out of work by buying into the Brave New Digital World... and sooner or later, that someone may be you.
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5