Letters

Letters 08-24-2015

Bush And Blame Jeb Bush strikes again. Understand that Bush III represents the nearly extinct, compassionate-conservative, moderate wing of the Republican party...

No More State Theatre I was quite surprised and disgusted by an article I saw in last week’s edition. On pages 18 and 19 was an article about how the State Theatre downtown let some homosexual couple get married there...

GMOs Unsustainable Steve Tuttle’s column on GMOs was both uninformed and off the mark. Genetic engineering will not feed the world like Tuttle claims. However, GMOs do have the potential to starve us because they are unsustainable...

A Pin Drop Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 to a group of Democrats in Charlevoix, an all-white, seemingly middle class, well-educated audience, half of whom were female...

A Slippery Slope Most of us would agree that an appropriate suggestion to a physician who refuses to provide a blood transfusion to a dying patient because of the doctor’s religious views would be, “Please doctor, change your profession as a less selfish means of protecting your religious freedom.”

Stabilize Our Climate Climate scientists have been saying that in order to stabilize the climate, we need to limit global warming to less than two degrees. Renewables other than hydropower provide less than 3 percent of the world energy. In order to achieve the two degree scenario, the world needs to generate 11 times more wind power by 2050, and 36 times more solar power. It will require a big helping of new nuclear power, too...

Harm From GMOs I usually agree with the well-reasoned opinions expressed in Stephen Tuttle’s columns but I must challenge his assertions concerning GMO foods. As many proponents of GMOs do, Mr. Tuttle conveniently ignores the basic fact that GMO corn, soybeans and other crops have been engineered to withstand massive quantities of herbicides. This strategy is designed to maximize profits for chemical companies, such as Monsanto. The use of copious quantities of herbicides, including glyphosates, is losing its effectiveness and the producers of these poisons are promoting the use of increasingly dangerous substances to achieve the same results...

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · Tourism & Northern...
. . . .

Tourism & Northern Michigan

Rick Coates - April 5th, 2007
This week, Northern Michigan feels like a ghost town as thousands from the region have headed out of state for Spring Break. Over the course of the coming weeks as school districts around Michigan take a break, hundreds of millions of dollars will leave the state, benefiting the economies of Florida, Texas, Mexico and several tropical islands.
Last week, more than 300 tourism leaders from Michigan gathered to talk about the state‘s challenged tourism economy. Depending on who does the counting, tourism is either the second or third largest industry in Michigan, so any way you look at it, tourism is important. Certainly, tourism is the backbone on the economy in Northern Michigan.
But since 9/11, the industry has been challenged. But that‘s only the case in Michigan as surrounding states have either returned or surpassed their pre-9/11 tourism economies. Michigan, the nation‘s seventh largest tourism economy, finds itself at or near the bottom in several industry indicators, such as hotel occupancy rates ranking dead last in 2006 for the second year in a row.
In ratio to its rank as the seventh largest tourist economy, Michigan is among the poorest funded states when it comes to tourism marketing dollars. Neighboring states, including Wisconsin, Illinois and Pennsylvania, spend two or three times what we do to market tourism.
Much of the blame has been laid on the condition of the state‘s economy, the auto industry woes, and high gas prices, along with the lack of marketing.
That might be part of it.
But not everyone in the state appears to be challenged by the economy, as evidenced by the masses heading out of state during Spring Break. In fact, Michigan is the only Midwest state with a tourism deficit (meaning Michiganders are spending more money on traveling outside of the state than is being spent on travel within). So the economy and gas prices are not keeping many from our state from traveling; they are just choosing destinations outside of Michigan.
The question is why?
It appears that Michigan’s challenged tourism economy is rooted in the lack of leadership. This was evidenced last week at the state‘s tourism conference at the Grand Traverse Resort. Despite the importance of this industry, Governor Granholm did not attend the conference. Although she found time to come to Traverse City for a town hall meeting, her schedule didn’t allow for attendance at the conference.
Her staffers stated she “didn’t want to reward one of the conference sponsors;” the Michigan Hotel, Motel & Resort Association, which endorsed Granholm’s opponent, Dick DeVos, last year.
Her elected colleagues in the House and Senate didn’t fare much better. Only a couple attended, and during the legislative sessions they offered little insight, except for the fact that they appreciate having “meat and cheese trays” and other perks provided to them when they are traveling.
It is obvious by the lack of attendance from Governor Granholm and the Legislature at the conference that Michigan’s tourism industry is paralyzed by politics.
Lansing needs to quit playing games and spending their time strategizing on the 2008 and 2010 campaigns, and start working on improving the economy.
One quick fix would be tourism. The first thing to be done is to give the industry the same status as Agriculture, Transportation, Education and Corrections and make it a cabinet department. Currently tourism (Travel Michigan) falls under the quasi-governmental agency, the Michigan Economic Development Corporation.
Sure, tourism helps with economic development, but travelers don’t see themselves as economic drivers -- they are here to have fun.
So, Governor Granholm and the legislature give Travel Michigan cabinet level status and establish a stand-alone website. Michigan.org is confusing for the traveler who wants information on travel attractions in the state. If you want an example of a great tourism website, check out Wisconsin’s
www.travelwisconsin.com, a site that is inviting and easy to navigate.
In Northern Michigan we can’t wait for Lansing to get their act together.
Local tourism leaders such as Brad Van Dommelen, president of the Traverse City
Convention and Visitors Bureau, have been
aggressively implementing various initiatives, from buying a tank of gas for visitors to creating a “girlfriends‘ getaway” (current trends show women are the primary decision makers when it comes to travel plans).
Probably Van Dommelen greatest undertaking is educating the public on the value of tourism. For some, tourism has become a dirty word here in the north country, but Van Dommelen has been aggressively working to change that. He has launched what is essentially a PR campaign, touting the benefits of tourism to the region.
Such benefits include $1 billion annually of economic impact and nearly 14,000 jobs in Grand Traverse County alone, all while contributing more than $10 million in taxes annually.
Other residual benefits include the region‘s healthcare system, cultural arts offerings, local shopping and dining. All are maintaining a high level of quality because they are supported by the region‘s tourism economy.
Wake up Lansing; stop worrying about the elections and start fixing the state‘s problems. Try starting with tourism. Maybe if people come and visit the state, they will like it and move here, start businesses, invest into the economy and pay taxes.
It‘s interesting that most Michiganders are unwilling to have their taxes increased, but they are willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars traveling outside of Michigan to benefit economies elsewhere. Try “Saying Yes To Michigan” this year and next year - it might just keep your taxes from going up.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close