Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Bailing out America
. . . .

Bailing out America

Robert Downes - February 4th, 2008
Are you kicking up your heels at the thought of your tax rebate this spring?
Yeah, sure.
But do you think the extra goodies in the mail are going to solve America’s economic problems? Probably not.
Congress has crafted an economic rescue package which will provide tax rebates of $600 for each taxpaying American, with $1,200 for married couples, plus $300 per child. That will mean a check in the mail to 117 million families.
Then there‘s another $50 billion to aid businesses, and Democrats in the U.S. Senate hope to toss in an extra $150 billion for seniors living on Social Security, and to extend unemployment benefits to people who are out of work.
Suddenly, it’s raining money. The idea is to stave off a recession.
And what’s that?
In the simplest terms, a recession occurs when people stop buying goods and services and the economy “recedes.” Then, companies lay off employees and even less stuff gets sold because unemployed people don’t have the money to go shopping. That makes the economy recede even further. More people get laid off, and so on, in a downward spiral.
So the rescue package is sort of like pouring a shot of gasoline in the nation’s carburetor in hopes of getting the economic engine running again. People will take their $600 down to Best Buy, or wherever, and we’ll shop our way back to a healthy economy.
But hold on. Whose products will we buy? Why, those made in South Korea, Honduras, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Vietnam and the Philippines, of course. All the places that now run the factories that used to be located in America.
How will that help America in the long run? Good question: If you keep impoverishing workers here by undercutting their jobs, who‘s going to have the spending power to keep the economy afloat?
The hope is that a burst of spending and further reductions in interest rates will stop the recession in its tracks.
Of course, it will also help the wealthy investors who moved all of those factories overseas in the first place -- a nice shot in the arm for Wall Street.
But regular folks who are out of a job with no prospects in sight? Well, $600 might buy a year‘s supply of oatmeal and powdered milk, or pay half a mortgage payment, but it‘s no longterm solution.
America’s problems are so deep-rooted that this rescue conjures up another analogy: it’s like tossing a shot glass of water at a forest fire in hopes that it will just go away.
For starters, there’s a flawed logic to the plan in the idea that more spending is the answer to our problems. Many Americans have already spent themselves into the poorhouse with their credit cards. Today, the average credit card debt of an American household totals roughly $10,000 (up from $3,000 a decade ago). And, as noted in Anne Stanton’s article last week (“Wading in a Sea of Debt”) -- there are some households with debts of $64,000 or more at 16% interest.
Many Americans have borrowed against their mortgages to pay off frivolous card debts. But -- whoops -- when you’re out of a job, you can’t pay that mortgage. So we’ve compounded our problem with a disaster in the sub-prime mortgage industry and the plunge in the stock market.
Instead of addressing the endemic problem of living beyond our means, Congress, the Senate and our president have crafted a rescue that heads further down the same road: they’re going to borrow the money from lenders overseas to bail us out. They’re going to “rescue” us the same way that they’re paying for the war in Iraq and the Bush tax cut: by borrowing from the Chinese and other foreign lenders, with the payback dumped on our grandchildren. (An article in The Atlantic Monthly notes that we currently owe China $1.4 trillion and are borrowing $1 billion per day.)
Thus, we credit card junkies will be bailed out by the credit card junkies in Congress on a grand scale.
It’s not a long-term solution.
To understand how America got in the jam it’s in today, you have to go back 60 years to the end of World War II.
It’s common wisdom in America that war is good for the economy. But that’s a big lie which only serves war profiteers. The reason America did well in the 1950s is because the factories of Britain, Germany, Japan, China, Italy and other manufacturing countries were bombed flat in World War II. Nobody had the means of production except America, so we thrived in a golden age of prosperity -- we went from the Great Depression to a consumer’s paradise. “Made in Detroit” became the gold standard of quality the world over.
But today, America’s manufacturing has flown the coop, and there are miles and miles of spanking new factories in the third world, with hundreds of millions of workers who’d give anything to slave in them for one-tenth of what an American makes.
Close to home, Michigan has suffered through eight years of job losses -- “the longest stretch of employment loss in the state since the Great Depression,” according to economists at the University of Michigan.
That’s the situation that needs rescuing. It‘s hard to imagine that a second round of Christmas-style spending this spring will wrap up our economic troubles with a bright, shiny bow.
What to do? For starters, we could all make a vow to spend those checks where they‘ll do our country the most good: by purchasing goods and services “made in America.”
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5