Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters 4/21/08
. . . .

Letters 4/21/08

- April 21st, 2008
Get informed
In their respective letters, Lisa Mai Shoemaker (“So childish,” April 7) and Gary Woodhams (“Cut the crap,” April 14) both show a detrimental level of cynicism toward our political process.
In her letter, Ms. Shoemaker fancies herself an “independent” and labels those who see a difference between Republicans and Democrats as “childish.” She tells readers that “nobody gives a damn” about their opinions.
A week later, Mr. Woodhams follows suit by openly mocking anyone who “swear[s] total allegiance to any political party” and even finds political jokes from coworkers insufferable.
Ms. Shoemaker laments that there are no “perfect” candidates and that no party can claim to have any “brains.” For his part, Mr. Woodhams rejects candidates Obama, Clinton, and McCain as being equally unsatisfactory.
In other words, Mr. Woodhams and Ms. Shoemaker would like us to think that they are somehow above the fray of politics, as if it were a pursuit only for simpletons and knuckle-draggers of the worst kind.
It is precisely this type of cynicism that degrades our political discourse instead of elevating it and, to borrow a phrase from Ms. Shoemaker, “makes me want to ralf.”
Cynicism of this kind is merely a transparent stand-in for doing actual political homework, and it prevents one from making an informed decision come election time.
The truth is our choices in the election booth do matter, and in this election cycle there is a lot at stake. Economic and foreign policy decisions, which profoundly affect us all, don’t just sprout out of the ground; they are made by the people we choose to make them, which means that now is not the time to plug our ears and scream, as Ms. Shoemaker would have us do, solely to dodge our civic responsibilities or to avoid “offensive” political commentary.
The president wields an enormous amount of power and influence. It is our job to pick one that will use it in the right way, and, despite what Mr. Woodhams would have us believe, there are significant ideological differences in the candidates. Furthermore, if Mr. Woodhams is right that lobbyists and special interests control Washington, it is only because we the people collectively sit back, throw up our hands, and let them.
An uninformed, cynical citizenry allows good politicians but bad leaders to seize the reigns of power. In the last few years, we have seen and felt the consequences of electing these types of people. But don’t blame it on them. We put them there.

Chip Corwin • Bellaire

Sorry state
I totally agree with the sentiments expressed by Mr. Woodhams concerning the current crop of presidential candidates and the sorry state of our country. Unfortunately, I do not have an answer as to what to do to change it.
It takes money to run a campaign and the average person who may think of running for office does not stand a chance against the big money machines which drives both parties. How do we elect someone who represents the people, if the people themselves would rather watch more smoke and mirrors campaigning?
Change, hope, tax breaks, needless wars, health care, social security, crumbling schools etc. All of these have been talked about before and every four years, what happens? NOTHING. It is also interesting to note that the three current campaigners are responsible for having a hand in the decisions of this disastrous administration by rubber stamping his every idea; now they are telling us how they are going to make it better for everybody. Where were they when it became necessary to reach across the aisle to try and do something for the good of the American people and our allies by working against some of his plans?
Our country is bankrupt because of the administration’s decisions, our troops are being killed for oil and bin Laden still lives. I love my country and for the first time in my life I can honestly say I will not be voting because it will be just more of the same. Until we as a united people demand the change that is truly necessary, our kids, grandchildren and great grandchildren will be paying for all of this when they could be spending it on their families.

Marilyn Prezkop • via email

Defending John McCain
In his recent letter to the editor, Bradford Krull comes off as very misinformed regarding Sen. John McCain. Krull states:
1. “Soldiers don’t make leaders, only followers...”
2. “He has a criminal past in being one of the Keating Five”
3. “I wish Jesse Ventura was running, if he could. He put it right as to starting war a: ‘you would only go to war if you were willing to send your own son or daughter.’ Very wise words and where is that in McCain?”
The first statement is ridiculous and insulting to Republicans and Democrats alike. PT 109? The Founder of our Country? Jackson, Carter, etc, etc, it seems almost silly to continue.
As to the Keating 5: The U.S. Senate determined that John Glenn (another useless military “follower”?) and John McCain were only minimally involved and did not receive censure. Add to that the work that John McCain has done to push for transparency in government, and the statement is even more asinine.
Lastly, the Jesse Ventura remark... First, I know that at the very least, McCain’s youngest sons serve in the military. The last time I checked, his son Jack was in the Naval Academy and his son Jimmy was stationed in Iraq.
I know there are many reasons to criticize Sen. John McCain. Apparently Mr. Krull cannot find a real one. As for me, I am passing on Jesse “The Body” Ventura‘s candidacy and holding out hope that the “Macho Man” Randy Savage throws his hat in the ring...Ohhhhh Yeeeeaah!

Mike Shockley • via email
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close