Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Books · The Bush Tragedy
. . . .

The Bush Tragedy

Robert Downes - April 21st, 2008
Last Act: The Bush Tragedy

The Bush Tragedy
By Jacob Weisberg
Random House
269 pages, $26

With the presidency of George W. Bush wrapping up as an historic disaster, authors are lining up to dissect how the president managed to pull so many blunders, including the war in Iraq, the wreck of America’s reputation around the world, and the disaster of New Orleans, to name a few.
Author Jacob Weisberg offers insights in “The Bush Tragedy,” a biography that explores the psychological issues that influenced George W. Bush. The book also examines the motives of Bush’s misguided advisors, Karl Rove and Dick Cheney, who led the inexperienced president into a series of poor decisions.
Weisberg compares Bush to Shakespeare’s Prince Hal, a ne’r-do-well youth who became the warlike and religious King Henry V of England. Like Prince Hal in Shakespeare’s plays “Henry IV” and “Henry V,” George W. stands in the shadow of a famous father: he’s desperate to live up to his father’s legend, and also to outdo his father to make his own mark as a man.
The editor of Slate.com, and a former writer for The New Republic, Weisberg notes that both George W. Bush and Prince Hal also play out roles drawn from even older stories: that of the prodigal son in the Bible and the father-destroying legend of Oedipus.
Both myths unfold in W.’s life in a family drama that is by now familiar to those who’ve followed the Bush dynasty. As a young man, Bush carried on like a drunken playboy, but got religion at the age of 40 and swore off alcohol, eager to regain the respect in his political-minded family. Yet the Bush family put its hopes on W.’s younger brother Jeb, who was considered to be more capable and intelligent.
During his 40s, prodigal son George W. struggled to regain his family’s confidence and live up to the example of his famous father, George Herbert Walker Bush -- a war hero, athlete and successful businessman in addition to serving as president. When his father was humiliated for not invading Iraq during the Gulf War of 1991-’92. George W. became obsessed with not only redeeming his father’s name, but also with surpassing him by dismissing H.W.’s policies and ignoring his advisors. He plunged into Iraq, refusing to take his father’s advice that it was a bad idea.
Ironically, George W. made such poor decisions as president that he succeeded in redeeming the reputation of George H.W. Bush as a paragon of wisdom by contrast. “The father, once dismissed as insignificant and weak, now stood as a perfect contrast to his reckless, swaggering son,” Weisberg writes.
“This is the personal side of the Bush Tragedy -- the downfall of a dynasty as well as the failure of a president,” Weisberg writes. “A son who tried to vindicate his family by repudiating his father’s policies ended up doing the opposite of what he intended. He showed the world his father’s wisdom and brought shame to his name.”
But George W. had plenty of help engineering this tragedy, and Weisberg tells the story of the men who set him down a trail full of booby-traps.
The political mastermind Karl Rove had an attraction to George W. on par with “Brokeback Mountain” in its gay overtones. Yet Rove ruined Bush’s presidency by injecting a poisonous spirit of partisanship that tried to establish a Republican majority in America for all time. As one example, Rove pushed the idea that Democrats were unpatriotic in the wake of the 9/11 attacks at a time when it would have been wiser to lock arms.
Bush came to the White House hoping to be a unifier, reaching across the aisle to the Democrats, but Rove “led him off course and prevented him from recognizing it until his presidency was too broken to fix.”
An even greater disaster for Bush, however, was Vice President Dick Cheney, a neoconservative who engineered the war in Iraq in the belief that democracy would break out across the Mideast.
Bush couldn’t resist Cheney’s arguments for war, particularly since he wanted to repair his father’s reputation which was damaged by not invading Iraq in 1992. Cheney also damaged Bush’s presidency by trying to expand the power of the executive branch of government, a quest he pursued with arrogant actions that led to the downfall of Lewis “Scooter” Libby and Karl Rove.
Bush also failed in the court of world opinion, because on one hand he preached the value of democracy around the world while trashing human rights and civil liberties.
“The dissonance between Bush’s message and his cavalier attitude toward civil liberties discredited him as a moral messenger,” Weisberg writes. “While pressing for divinely ordained liberty in the Middle East, Bush was still taking Dick Cheney’s advice on keeping Guantanamo open, allowing torture, and unconstitutionally listening in on phone conversations by American citizens.”
There’s much else of interest in “The Bush Tragedy,” particularly W.’s rise to power courtesy of the evangelical movement. Bush is adept at “Jesus talk” and lining up church supporters on the right, but seems to have few ideas on faith. Privately, he and Rove think of the religious right as being “wackos,” but still go ahead with loading up government posts with incompetent religious fundamentalists as a payoff for getting elected.
Ultimately, Weisberg’s use of Shakespeare’s “Henry” tragedies is a gimmick -- a lens through which to view George W. Bush and his family. But the book does offer a good capsule history of the president, the Bush family and the main players who are featured in his drama and downfall.
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5