Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Books · The Bush Tragedy
. . . .

The Bush Tragedy

Robert Downes - April 21st, 2008
Last Act: The Bush Tragedy

The Bush Tragedy
By Jacob Weisberg
Random House
269 pages, $26


With the presidency of George W. Bush wrapping up as an historic disaster, authors are lining up to dissect how the president managed to pull so many blunders, including the war in Iraq, the wreck of America’s reputation around the world, and the disaster of New Orleans, to name a few.
Author Jacob Weisberg offers insights in “The Bush Tragedy,” a biography that explores the psychological issues that influenced George W. Bush. The book also examines the motives of Bush’s misguided advisors, Karl Rove and Dick Cheney, who led the inexperienced president into a series of poor decisions.
Weisberg compares Bush to Shakespeare’s Prince Hal, a ne’r-do-well youth who became the warlike and religious King Henry V of England. Like Prince Hal in Shakespeare’s plays “Henry IV” and “Henry V,” George W. stands in the shadow of a famous father: he’s desperate to live up to his father’s legend, and also to outdo his father to make his own mark as a man.
The editor of Slate.com, and a former writer for The New Republic, Weisberg notes that both George W. Bush and Prince Hal also play out roles drawn from even older stories: that of the prodigal son in the Bible and the father-destroying legend of Oedipus.
Both myths unfold in W.’s life in a family drama that is by now familiar to those who’ve followed the Bush dynasty. As a young man, Bush carried on like a drunken playboy, but got religion at the age of 40 and swore off alcohol, eager to regain the respect in his political-minded family. Yet the Bush family put its hopes on W.’s younger brother Jeb, who was considered to be more capable and intelligent.
During his 40s, prodigal son George W. struggled to regain his family’s confidence and live up to the example of his famous father, George Herbert Walker Bush -- a war hero, athlete and successful businessman in addition to serving as president. When his father was humiliated for not invading Iraq during the Gulf War of 1991-’92. George W. became obsessed with not only redeeming his father’s name, but also with surpassing him by dismissing H.W.’s policies and ignoring his advisors. He plunged into Iraq, refusing to take his father’s advice that it was a bad idea.
Ironically, George W. made such poor decisions as president that he succeeded in redeeming the reputation of George H.W. Bush as a paragon of wisdom by contrast. “The father, once dismissed as insignificant and weak, now stood as a perfect contrast to his reckless, swaggering son,” Weisberg writes.
“This is the personal side of the Bush Tragedy -- the downfall of a dynasty as well as the failure of a president,” Weisberg writes. “A son who tried to vindicate his family by repudiating his father’s policies ended up doing the opposite of what he intended. He showed the world his father’s wisdom and brought shame to his name.”
But George W. had plenty of help engineering this tragedy, and Weisberg tells the story of the men who set him down a trail full of booby-traps.
The political mastermind Karl Rove had an attraction to George W. on par with “Brokeback Mountain” in its gay overtones. Yet Rove ruined Bush’s presidency by injecting a poisonous spirit of partisanship that tried to establish a Republican majority in America for all time. As one example, Rove pushed the idea that Democrats were unpatriotic in the wake of the 9/11 attacks at a time when it would have been wiser to lock arms.
Bush came to the White House hoping to be a unifier, reaching across the aisle to the Democrats, but Rove “led him off course and prevented him from recognizing it until his presidency was too broken to fix.”
An even greater disaster for Bush, however, was Vice President Dick Cheney, a neoconservative who engineered the war in Iraq in the belief that democracy would break out across the Mideast.
Bush couldn’t resist Cheney’s arguments for war, particularly since he wanted to repair his father’s reputation which was damaged by not invading Iraq in 1992. Cheney also damaged Bush’s presidency by trying to expand the power of the executive branch of government, a quest he pursued with arrogant actions that led to the downfall of Lewis “Scooter” Libby and Karl Rove.
Bush also failed in the court of world opinion, because on one hand he preached the value of democracy around the world while trashing human rights and civil liberties.
“The dissonance between Bush’s message and his cavalier attitude toward civil liberties discredited him as a moral messenger,” Weisberg writes. “While pressing for divinely ordained liberty in the Middle East, Bush was still taking Dick Cheney’s advice on keeping Guantanamo open, allowing torture, and unconstitutionally listening in on phone conversations by American citizens.”
There’s much else of interest in “The Bush Tragedy,” particularly W.’s rise to power courtesy of the evangelical movement. Bush is adept at “Jesus talk” and lining up church supporters on the right, but seems to have few ideas on faith. Privately, he and Rove think of the religious right as being “wackos,” but still go ahead with loading up government posts with incompetent religious fundamentalists as a payoff for getting elected.
Ultimately, Weisberg’s use of Shakespeare’s “Henry” tragedies is a gimmick -- a lens through which to view George W. Bush and his family. But the book does offer a good capsule history of the president, the Bush family and the main players who are featured in his drama and downfall.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close