Letters

Letters 09-26-2016

Welcome To 1984 The Democrat Party, the government education complex, private corporations and foundations, the news media and the allpervasive sports and entertainment industry have incrementally repressed the foundational right of We the People to publicly debate open borders, forced immigration, sanctuary cities and the calamitous destruction of innate gender norms...

Grow Up, Kachadurian Apparently Tom Kachadurian has great words; too bad they make little sense. His Sept. 19 editorial highlights his prevalent beliefs that only Hillary and the Dems are engaged in namecalling and polarizing actions. Huh? What rock does he live under up on Old Mission...

Facts MatterThomas Kachadurian’s “In the Basket” opinion deliberately chooses to twist what Clinton said. He chooses to argue that her basket lumped all into the clearly despicable categories of the racist, sexist, homophobic , etc. segments of the alt right...

Turn Off Fox, Kachadurian I read Thomas Kachadurian’s opinion letter in last week’s issue. It seemed this opinion was the product of someone who offered nothing but what anyone could hear 24/7/365 on Fox News; a one-sided slime job that has been done better by Fox than this writer every day of the year...

Let’s Fix This Political Process Enough! We have been embroiled in the current election cycle for…well, over a year, or is it almost two? What is the benefit of this insanity? Exorbitant amounts of money are spent, candidates are under the microscope day and night, the media – now in action 24/7 – focuses on anything and everything anyone does, and then analyzes until the next event, and on it goes...

Can’t Cut Taxes 

We are in a different place today. The slogan, “Making America Great Again” begs the questions, “great for whom?” and “when was it great?” I have claimed my generation has lived in a bubble since WWII, which has offered a prosperity for a majority of the people. The bubble has burst over the last few decades. The jobs which provided a good living for people without a college degree are vanishing. Unions, which looked out for the welfare of employees, have been shrinking. Businesses have sought to produce goods where labor is not expensive...

Wrong About Clinton In response to Thomas Kachadurian’s column, I have to take issue with many of his points. First, his remarks about Ms. Clinton’s statement regarding Trump supporters was misleading. She was referring to a large segment of his supporters, not all. And the sad fact is that her statement was not a “smug notion.” Rather, it was the sad truth, as witnessed by the large turnout of new voters in the primaries and the ugly incidents at so many of his rallies...

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Looking Beyond the...
. . . .

Looking Beyond the Election

Robert Downes - October 27th, 2008
Here’s something we haven’t seen in many years: posted in a few yards around Traverse City you’ll find campaign signs for Obama next to those of Wayne Schmidt -- the Republican candidate for State Representative in the 104th District.
Say what? Is it possible that in some small way, we’re moving toward a spirit of bipartisanship? Sort of like a dog and cat snuggling up together when its too cold outside to bear their differences?
There’s been endless speculation in the press about undecided voters this year and who the independents will vote for in the national election.
But those “undecideds” are primarily Republicans who are thinking of jumping ship for the first time in their lives, the same way that many Democrats voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980.
This is why we’re seeing defections by the likes of Colin Powell, who served as Secretary of State under President Bush, and Christopher Buckley, the son of conservative icon William F. Buckley. Both are Republicans voting for Obama.
Call it the Reagan Effect.
Like Obama, Reagan was a charismatic leader who signaled an uplifting new direction for the country in the wake of a devastated economy and the lackluster leadership of Jimmy Carter. “Reagan Democrats” flocked to his standard in droves. Today, some of them are coming back to their roots, for the same reasons that resonated in 1980.
But a more pressing issue for those of us who live in Michigan is the mindset of our new State Legislature. We’re on the ropes. Michigan has lost 400,000 jobs since mid-2000, according to economists at the University of Michigan. That includes 51,000 jobs in 2008.
Meanwhile, the recent drop in the stock market has hammered the endowments of hospitals, art organizations and schools across the state, with losses ranging into tens of millions of dollars. Consider an organization like Interlochen Center for the Arts, which has an endowment of some $50 million (or did, anyway). What does a 40 percent drop in investments mean to them? What does it mean to Munson Medical Center? Northern Michigan Hospital? Our colleges? All of these organizations rely on their endowments.
At the State level, Michigan began its fiscal year October 1 with projections that tax revenues will fall $550 million below what is needed to pay for services, according to a report in the Associated Press. And that was before the wheels fell off the economy.
Closer to home, it’s estimated that one in six homeowners are now paying back mortgages that total more than the worth of their homes. And of course, millions of people have seen their retirement funds swept away with no way of knowing if and when the tide will shift.
So, if ever there was a time for our state legislators to put aside party differences and start pulling the oars in the same direction, this is it.
Currently, our State House is divided into 58 Democratic reps and 52 Republicans. Our State Senate is made up of 21 Republicans and 17 Democrats.
How are they doing? Well, who can judge when the hurricane of globalization and automation is shivering corporations such as GM, Chrysler and Ford to splinters? Who can judge when titanic forces are sweeping the economies around the world?
But just a year ago, the Legislature was blasted as one of the worst in the history of the State, with gridlock and backbiting prompting front-page editorials in the Detroit newspapers. In a widely-circulated column, Phil Power, president of the Center for Michigan political think tank, had this to say: “The editorial pages in Michigan’s newspapers are uniformly and savagely contemptuous of our political leaders. Talk with long-time Lansing hands and business leaders, and they say in living memory they’ve never seen things this bad.”
Much of that “savage contempt” was due to the fact that legislators weren’t moving the State forward on the budget crisis and the meltdown in jobs. For some, “sticking it” to Gov. Granholm was a bigger concern than rescuing Michigan; others wrangled over the transition from the unloved Single Business Tax to the equally unpopular Michigan Business Tax.
So, it will be interesting to see how the upcoming election shakes out at the State House.
There is some good news for Michigan, however: Due to budget cuts approved in March, this year Michigan will spend $150 million less than the state spent in 2001. And U-M’s economists claim the state will gain 15,000 jobs in 2009, and that vehicle sales will stabilize, along with a rebound in home building.
But these predictions were made before the current financial massacre, so let’s keep our fingers crossed.
One thing is clear: it‘s going to take more teamwork than we’ve seen in the past to get Michigan back on its feet.
Just as voters are crossing the lines to vote a split ticket this fall, so too must our new legislators look beyond party loyalty. Gov. Granholm is term-limited and can’t run in the 2010 election, so there’s no “whipping boy” (or girl) to blame if the legislature can’t get it together.
We’ll be counting on the newcomers of 2009 to ‘hold their noses‘ and reach across the aisle for the greater good. We‘ll be counting on them to be more inclusive, more cooperative, and more productive in moving Michigan forward.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close