Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · The dropout dilemma
. . . .

The dropout dilemma

Robert Downes - March 9th, 2009
Raising Michigan’s high school dropout age to 18 sounds like a good idea in principle. But one could also argue that the new legislation may harm students who are committed to graduating by forcing them to endure the company of disruptive kids who are turned off by high school.
On March 4, the Michigan House of Representatives voted 71-31 to approve passage of House Bill 4030, which will require students to attend high school until the age of 18. The bill has gone on to the State Senate, where it faces an uncertain future.
Sponsored by State Rep. Doug Geiss (D-Taylor), the bill is the first change in Michigan’s allowable dropout age in 113 years. In 1896, the legislature ruled that students could leave school at the age of 16, primarily to help work on family farms.
Rep. Geiss makes some good points in promoting his bill. He notes that 70 percent of prisoners in Michigan are high school dropouts. He points out that requiring students to spend an extra two years in high school will better prepare them to find jobs, instead of being a drag on society.
Then too, 28 other states have raised the dropout age for students, and the bill has the support of Governor Granholm, who hopes to double the number of college students in Michigan.
We also have what amounts to a dropout crisis in our state, according to the Michigan Education Association (MEA).
Doug Pratt, communications director for the MEA, noted in an interview on Lansing radio station WILS that an estimated 20,000 Michigan students drop out of high school each year. On the average, they cost state residents $127,000 per year in lost tax revenues, public health care, unemployment, law enforcement, incarceration and other costs. “That’s $2.5 billion we could be recapturing if we could keep students in high school.”
Sounds pretty good, doesn’t it? The hope is that by raising the dropout age to 18, millions of bored, unmotivated students will be energized by two more years of school, turning their lives around to become productive members of society.
At least, that’s how it’s supposed to work, but you have to wonder if Michigan teachers are doing handsprings over the idea.
For starters, if a teenager wants to learn something, like playing the guitar or how to create a website, nothing can stop him or her. We’ve all known teens willing to spend every waking moment learning what they love.
But for kids who don’t want to learn, that’s another story.
One can only imagine the difficulty in keeping restless teenagers motivated to study subjects such as algebra, history, chemistry and English literature. Our teachers perform a heroic service every day of the week, trying to keep kids on track to graduation.
Will that gargantuan effort be made any easier by requiring unhappy, uncaring, potentially disruptive students to remain in school?
Parents of younger female students might also question the wisdom of requiring older ne’er-do-well male students to remain in school. Many studies point out the hazards of 18 and 19-year-old men hooking up with impressionable 15- and 16-year-old girls.
Do you want your honor student daughter swayed by a nihilistic young Romeo who’s going nowhere with his life, but has been stuck in high school for an extra two years? He may not have any interest in studying, but plenty of interest in leading your naive, easily-swayed child down the wrong track.
These days, you’d have to be a fool to drop out of high school, since even unskilled jobs are disappearing. Unfortunately, many teens have difficulty seeing the big picture of what their lives will be like 10, 20, 30 years on. Many teens suffer from poor judgement, low self-esteem, depression, and a general feeling of hopelessness about their future. Some are simply not inclined towards academics, but may be a whiz at working in an auto shop.
Ultimately, perhaps we’d be better off with cultural solutions to the dropout crisis, rather than a government fix. In a recent speech to Congress, President Obama made a ringing statement directed at students, noting that when you drop out of high school, you’re letting your country down as well as yourself.
Perhaps that’s the kind of talk we need to hear more of, not just in our schools, but on TV and in our homes. Kids need inspiration, perhaps in the form of more counseling in our schools. The Michigan Chamber of Commerce suggests hiring ‘dropout coaches’ for students who are at risk of dropping out; or allowing community colleges to accept students who feel the need for a challenge greater than high school can provide.
“Solutions... such as raising the dropout age are punitive. That doesn’t get to the cause of why they drop out in the first place,” the MEA’s Doug Pratt said in the interview quoted earlier.
We also need to remember that our cash-strapped state already has a cultural cure for the dropout crisis. It’s the reality check of working for minimum wage for a few years until it sinks in that it’s time to reboot your life.
That’s why we have the G.E.D. -- to give young people a second chance. In 2006, 9,839 students took the General Educational Development course in Michigan to complete their high school equivalency.
That leaves about 10,000 dropouts per year who didn‘t complete either high school or the G.E.D. That‘s a shame, but we can‘t expect government to solve every social ill, especially when scarce money for education might be better spent on those who really want to learn.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5