Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Some dam good ideas
. . . .

Some dam good ideas

Robert Downes - June 30th, 2008
Here’s an old idea whose time has finally come around again: hydroelectric dams.
While Grand Traverse County and Traverse City have been mulling over whether to tear down two power-generating dams on the Boardman River, more forward-thinking (or should we say “backward”?) persons in other states are giving dams a second look as a way to generate clean electrical power.
Currently, a power company in Pennsylvania is sinking $350 million into revitalizing a decrepit old dam on the Susquehanna River. When it goes on line, the dam will generate power for 100,000 homes.
Meanwhile, upgrades are underway at 23 dams in Idaho, California, Kentucky and other states, according to an article in the Baltimore Sun.
And that’s pollution-free power. Power that doesn’t add anything to global warming and comes free of charge from the motion of water through a turbine.
The Sun notes that there are 79,000 dams in America. But only 2,400 dams have hydroelectric generators, producing just seven percent of our nation’s power. Adding turbines to more of our country’s dams could provide enough juice to power 27 million homes.
Closer to home, two power companies are currently seeking permits to generate electrical power on the dams on the Boardman River owned by GT County and Traverse City. The county is spending $1.4 million on a study to determine if the dams should be taken down.
Traverse City Light & Power stopped generating electricity at the dams in 2005, claiming the dams were too costly to maintain.
Yet, consider that there are plans to establish seven new coal-powered plants in Michigan and a new wood-burning plant in Kalkaska. Why are we pursuing these dirty technologies when Michigan is a state that is rich in rivers and wind resources?
Add to that the fact that the Sabin and Boardman dams are the bulwarks of two lovely ponds teeming with wildlife and it seems a no-brainer. Dam it all! Let’s not pull the plug on our local dams until we reconsider this clean, renewable resource.

John McCain’s Contest
Give presidential candidate John McCain credit: he’s thinking outside the box with his idea of awarding a $300 million prize to the person or team that comes up with a long-life battery to power the car of the future.
For that world-changing suggestion alone, perhaps he deserves to be president.
Considering the peril our planet faces from global warming, not to mention America’s plight of being dependent on foreign energy, the zero-emissions battery system McCain recommends is urgently needed.
Currently, it’s possible to create a plug-in car battery for around $5,000, according to a professor of science and engineering, quoted in MIT’s Technology Review. But it wouldn’t take the average car very far: less than 40 miles on a charge.
What is needed is a dramatically improved battery -- one that might be created if there were, say, a prize of $300 million.
The prize isn’t such a crazy idea: in the 18th century, the world was transformed by a similar contest. In 1714, the British government offered a prize of 20,000 pounds to the inventor who came up with the first reliable marine chronometer.
And what is that? The thing we now call a clock. Without a clock to refer to for navigational purposes, it was impossible for sailors to determine longitude with any accuracy. Without knowing one‘s longitude, it was impossible to explore and map the world.
It took more than 20 years to invent a reliable, spring-driven mechanical clock that could be used at sea. The prize was claimed by John Harrison -- a woodworker who enjoyed tinkering with wooden clocks -- in 1737.

One Man with an Idea
Speaking of changing the world, I‘d like to direct your attention to our GearBox feature on page 35 this week to highlight a gas-saving idea by local publisher Mark Bonter.
Bonter has come up with a simple booklet called The GasFactor which makes it easy to compute how much a car trip will cost around town.
The beauty of the booklet is that it makes you think about your driving habits and reconsider unnecessary trips -- knowledge is power. Check it out.

Beyond impeachment
Recently, Rep. Dennis Kucinich spent five hours in the House of Representatives reading off a laundry list of reasons as to why President Bush and Vice President Cheney should be impeached for their disastrous reign of error.
Predictably, the idea has gone nowhere because the Democrats want a nice soft landing for this year‘s presidential election, and impeachment proceedings would only muddy the waters.
As an aside, if a Democratic administration had pulled all of the blunders and evil deeds that Bush and Cheney have been party to, the Republicans would have had them impeached years ago.
A more urgent matter in these times of high gas prices and record oil company profits might be investigating what kind of crooked deal Bush and Cheney made with the energy companies back in 2001.
To refresh your memory, after only two weeks in office, former oil company president George Bush created an Energy Task Force chaired by Dick Cheney, who also had ties to energy companies.
Cheney went on to hold top-secret meetings with the oil, gas, coal and nuclear industries, the results of which have never been revealed, despite congressional investigations, lawsuits and grand jury subpoenas.
Did those secret meetings have anything to do with the war in Iraq, $4 gas, and Exxon‘s quarterly profit of $11.7 billion -- the highest in history? We deserve to know.
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5