Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters 3/6/03
. . . .

Letters 3/6/03

Various - March 6th, 2003
The human cost of the war

A nightmare visited me the other night. I stood, surrounded by a smoldering city, with a lifeless, bloody and burned toddler in my arms. Before me stood the child’s mother. I looked the woman in the eyes and tried in vain to explain that her child’s death was necessary for my security. Incoherent babble was all that passed my lips.
I awoke to discover that reality offered little relief. The morning paper included an article about a meeting called by the Swiss government to begin planning for the humanitarian relief if we go to war. All member nations of the U.N. Security Council were there, along with Iraq’s neighbors and the relief agencies that work in the region. The U.S. declined the invitation.
How can there be so little dialogue about the human cost of war? There’s little talk of the 70,000 innocent deaths that resulted from the Gulf War and it’s aftermath. Yet, there’s plenty of talk daily about the impact the coming war may have on our economy and investment portfolios.
Is anyone out there prepared to sacrifice their baby? Would you be willing to explain to the thousands of mothers, fathers and loved ones of the inevitable innocent dead why their sacrifice was necessary? If we lower the standards of justification for war as low as they are now, will we not be compelled to invade the other 50 plus countries in the world with despot leaders and the potential to compile “weapons of mass destruction?”
That lifeless child in my nightmare raised a number of questions. But as I looked into the eyes of my beautiful and full of life two-year-old that morning, I saw the true cost of war with the utmost clarity.

Timothy Young • Honor

Backtalk on Iraq

The debate continues. I have been challenged by Charles Russell to defend my letter and my views (Letters 2/20), and I am pleased to do so. I am happy that you responded to my letter, because yes, Mr. Russell, free speech does go both ways. We agree on that.
You said “Mr. Mayer provided a honest observation of the hypocrisy in the behavior and the life styles of the local protesters.“ I challenge you to explain that. How is dressing warm for the weather and heating our homes as we express our dissenting views hypocritical?
You accuse me of spreading propaganda. Since you like dictionary definitions, Webster‘s defines propaganda as “the spreading of ideas, facts, or allegations deliberately to further one‘s cause.“ Under this definition I agree I was furthering my cause. The problem with pro-war propaganda is that it misguides. For example: the idea that we have to attack Iraq so that we can have security against terrorism is false. Bombing will cause more anti-American sentiment, which can be used to fuel terrorism. That‘s why I say war breeds terrorism. Is that clear for you now Mr. Russell?
Also, according to your definition of terrorism (which is “Government by intimidation as directed and carried out by the party in power.“) the U.S. (a government in power) waging war against Iraq (intimidation) is terrorism.
Saddam Hussein is not a good person, we all know that. And I wasn‘t saying otherwise. But dictators in other countries have committed the same crimes, and worse. Why aren‘t we waging war in those countries? It‘s because we have nothing to gain; they have no oil. Also, Mr. Russell, you compare Saddam Hussein to Hitler. How does that have any validity? I also challenge you to explain yourself on that.
You asked why the United States was not able to enter WWII until it was attacked on its own soil. You seem to be saying that fear of public opinion caused the United States to let WWII go on for too long. How is that connected to the situation in Iraq? Who is Iraq invading right now? Who is Iraq trying to exterminate right now? It‘s obvious from President Bush‘s statements that he doesn‘t care about what the American public or the world thinks anyway. When millions of us get together to oppose his decision on attacking Iraq, he dismisses us out of hand to the press.
You asked why the atrocities committed by Japan against the people of China, Korea, etc. were ignored by the United States. My answer is, Japan didn‘t have a lot of oil or anything else we needed. Thank you for helping me make my point.
Doesn‘t it sway you at all, Mr. Russell, that countries all over the world are against military action in Iraq? While I was at that protest that made me “lose my sense of reality,“ I talked to veterans that fought in wars. War was their reality. Have you ever killed a man for your country? Well they did. And I respect them, and their opinion, which is that war is not the solution. John F. Kennedy said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.“ So let‘s make our choice.

Ruthy Posluszny - TC

Trash your TV

Just get rid of your TV, won‘t you, it‘ll improve your outlook tremendously (Re: Random Thoughts 2/27).
No excuses now--if we live in the Golden Age of Crapola, well the capital of the Golden Age of Crapola, its great golden pleasure dome is inside your TV.
Don‘t try telling me that NOVA is okay or FrontLine -- you‘d be better off reading those two hours and you know it. And think of all those other hours you‘d be gaining.
Don‘t mean to pry, but if you‘re going to whine in print about what‘s on TV, I‘m going to tell you to get rid of the damned thing.
Potential slogan: Trash your TV, read your Northern Express more thoroughly!

Oran Kelley • TC

Poverty problems rising

I am writing to ask that Northern Express write an article on the impact that will take place in public service programs as a result of the recent budget cuts at the state level.
I work for the Benzie County Community Chest. The Community Chest acts as a philanthropic organization, much like the United Way. We raise funds through campaign drives, payroll deduction programs, etc. We then distribute support grants to local service agencies that assist low-income residents in our community.
Today, the non-profit public service sector is facing many challenges. We have a dwindling economy, unemployment on the rise, and cuts being made to state funded service programs that help the working poor, the elderly the physically challenged, and many others.
I read your article, “Hunger In Northern Michigan“ (2/20). I was so glad to see something like this in the paper. But this is just part of the problem. There has been little media coverage on the significant impact our state service programs are facing. Or the severity of the budget cuts for 2004, which will begin in October of this year. I fear that unless the word gets out, there will be no preparedness to meet the impending changes.
Michigan‘s general fund/general purpose budget, the source of state funding for Medicaid, is projected to be short $600 million in the current fiscal year. In 2004, the revenue shortfall could be as high as $1.8 billion.
Now, President Bush is proposing to do away with Medicaid at the federal level and instead, is proposing block grants which will be administered to the state.
What do all these changes mean for the non-profit world -- those who are working to help fill in the gaps? It means more requests for funding support and larger dollar requests. However, with the economy in decline, donations are expected to be down for many fundraising organizations. Changes that Bush is proposing may force private foundations to give less, causing the non-profit sector to compete even more for funding to support valuable programs.
What does it mean to the local community? It a nutshell, it means what service and how that services is rendered will change. That is, client eligibility determination, number of clients the program will continue to serve (due to funding), and if the service will continue to exist at all.
I urge you to check out the Michigan League for Human Services home page at: www.milhs.org and read the most recent legislative bulletins. Legislative Bulletin Vol. 8, Issue 1, lists the reduction in dollars and which programs will receive the elimination of funds. It‘’s shocking.

Alicia Harrison • Executive Director
Benzie County Community Chest

(Northern Express plans to cover a broad range of problems related to human need and the economy throughout the year in our People in Need series. This issue focuses on the Goodwill Inn homeless shelter. -- ed.)
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5