Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Food Paranoia
. . . .

Food Paranoia

Robert Downes - September 22nd, 2008
Do you like bugs in your food? Neither do I. But not so long ago, that was a fairly common occurrence.
Sorry to gross you out here, but it used to be possible that you’d open a box of pancake mix, or a bag of flour or instant potatoes that had been sitting around a couple of months and find... weevils!
Those are beetle larvae for those of you who flunked biology.
Then the food industry started irradiating all of the above in the 1980s. This involves zapping food with a burst of high-energy radiation. It not only killed the critters and bug eggs that hatched in these products, but did away with a lot of bacteria and micro-organisms that make people sick. It also served as a preservative -- doubling the shelf life of strawberries, for instance.
I once interviewed a scientist at Oakland University who ate a piece of steak that had been sitting on a shelf for two years without refrigeration. The steak had been irradiated and sealed in a plastic bag. Since all of its bacteria had been killed, it was still safe to eat two years after being zapped.
By 1990, irradiation had been approved by more than 30 countries. And the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved the procedure for pork, turkey, chicken and fish to kill dangerous bacteria, including Salmonella.
But initially, people flipped. There were concerns that irradiated food would be radioactive, since the words sound the same. But this is not true: irradiated food is no more radioactive than your teeth are after an X-ray.
Others feared that irradiation would destroy the “life force” or “soul” of their food -- possibly the same crowd that believes a diagnostic MRI exam will wreck your aura. But gradually the fears melted away, and most of us probably don’t have a clue that we’re eating irradiated Cheerios or whatever today.
But food paranoia hasn’t gone away: currently, an outfit called the Organic Consumers Association is up in arms over a plan to irradiate lettuce and spinach. They point to studies which claim that irradiation depletes food of vitamins, enzymes and medicinal nutrients.
There are even conspiracy theorists who claim that this summer’s tomato panic was engineered by the FDA and the food-nuking industry in a bid to mandate the irradiation of all vegetables.
Actually, it does make you wonder -- even if there was no such conspiracy, someone at the FDA really screwed up on this food scare.
In June, tens of millions of dollars worth of tomatoes were destroyed because the FDA claimed they were the source of an outbreak of a rare form of bacteria called Salmonella Saintpaul.
Salmonella Saintpaul presents itself as diarrhea, fever and abdominal cramps within 12-72 hours of infection, according to the CDC. Kind of like a bad enchilada.
My wife asked me the other day why we hadn’t made much fresh salsa this summer: now I remember -- it was because there weren’t any Roma tomatoes available.
But then -- whoops! -- it turned out that tomatoes were the innocent victims of character assassination, and some jalapeno peppers from Mexico were the real culprits. Ay, yi, yi...
By late August, the national Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that 1,442 people had been infected with the bug in 43 states.
So, problem solved with those pesky peppers? Not so fast -- some critics smell a rat.
“Is there no vegetable safe from destruction by the FDA?” wrote organic food activist Mike Adams in the July issue of a publication called the Natural News.
Adams and other organic food folks claim that tomatoes, peppers, onions, cilantro and other veggie suspects don’t harbor Salmonella.
“Salmonella only festers in factory-farmed animals, folks, and that means the real source of contamination is no doubt some animal factory upstream from the vegetable processing centers,” Adams writes. “So why isn’t the FDA going after the animal factories that likely caused this whole fiasco? Because making Americans scared of their vegetables is a great way to advance the FDA’s food irradiation agenda which would destroy virtually all the medicinal phytonutrients in plants.”
Recently, the FDA lifted its warning on eating jalapeno and serrano peppers, since these bad boys are no longer in circulation in the U.S. But the controversy over irradiation continues and it makes you wonder, who’s next?
I hear that cauliflower has left the country with no forwarding address, and broccoli is shaking in its boots. Green beans are so nervous and depressed that they’ve started taking Prozac. Meanwhile, tomatoes are considering a defamation of character suit, while hot chili peppers still haven’t lived down the shame.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5