Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · The death of Hip again
. . . .

The death of Hip again

Robert Downes - September 14th, 2009
Random Thoughts
Robert Downes 9/14/09

The Death of ‘Hip‘ (Again)
What’s the hippest show on TV these days?
If you believe the critics, along with millions of viewers, four Golden Globe awards and six Emmys, it’s Mad Men, a drama about the stressed-out, hard-drinkin’, skirt-chasin’, underpaid and overworked ad executives of Madison Avenue.
Cue up the Perry Como records.
Mad Men takes place back in the early ‘60s and reinvents the men in the gray flannel suits as brimming with snappy patter, Old Fashioneds, and a devil-may-care attitude about sleeping with their secretaries. You know, like really “hip.”
The funny thing here is that the “Mad Men” are just the sort of worker drones the beatniks and bohemians rebelled against when they came up with the alternative “hipster” lifestyle in the 1950s.
As every English Lit major knows, to be “hip” was to live outside of the mainstream, with Beat writers such as Jack Kerouac, William Burroughs and Allen Ginsburg making it up as they went along; hitchhiking down the highways of America in the late-’40s and 1950s, and pushing on to Mexico, Morocco and India. The Beats borrowed ideas from other, more exotic cultures, not to mention the liberal use of marijuana and hallucinogens such as peyote and ayahuasca.
The late author Norman Mailer wrote a famous essay in 1957 called “The White Negro” on what it meant to be hip: basically, you had to slip into the loose loafers of a black jazz musician, fire up a dooby and swing, man, swing...
So the cynics who invented “hip” would surely scoff at Mad Men as being the epitome of hip today. But then, those long-gone beatniks never would have dreamed that the zenith of hipsters these days -- Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake -- would have been the manufactured products of the Mickey Mouse Club (!).
In the 1950s, the “Mad Men” of the day were the antithesis of “hip.” Sloan Wilson’s novel, The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit, described the arid, joyless lifestyle of working in that sort of environment, imprisoned by conformity and stifled by the suburbs (a story retold in the recent film, Revolutionary Road). There was a good reason why they drank all that bourbon.
It goes to show that “hip” is a snake that continually eats itself and re-emerges -- that post-modern quality where every fashion and fad is recycled and reinvented with a different twist. Frank Sinatra, the biggest square imaginable to Woodstock Nation in the ‘60s, is now a “must” on their iPods in the ‘00s.
“Hipness” is a navel-gazing subject, but it gets trotted out every 10 years or so to be declared dead and gone... only to live again.
By the end of the ‘60s, for instance, the Beat writers were declaring that King Hip had been killed off by the youth marketing hurricane of records, bell bottoms, black light posters and headbands. Social critic Thomas Frank (author of What’s Wrong With Kansas) raged against hipness all through the early ‘90s in his literary magazine, The Baffler, noting that it was just a ruse to sell kids more products. Big revelation there.
Then in the early ‘00s, young writers in the hipper environs of New York City declared that “irony is dead” -- a significant development since irony is one of the main ingredients in being a hipster. They even wrote several ironic books on the subject.
But what’s really killed off “hip” is that it’s a lot of work. Yeah, sure, there’s the example of the lowbrow, free-loving car thief Neal Cassady from On the Road, but mostly the hipster gig involves being some shade of a too-cool-for-school intellectual. You have to be up on a wide range of obscure, esoteric subjects, with a practiced sneer for those not-in-the-know.
For the Beats, that meant having a passing knowledge of Buddhism; the poets William Blake and Rimbaud; the books of Hermann Hesse; and digging the music of John Coltrane, Miles Davis and Charlie Parker. No big hurdle there.
But today’s hipster needs to know so much more, and “what is hip?” gets recycled so much faster. Remember when Seattle’s grunge scene was so hip it made your teeth hurt? Today, grunge is considered a musical joke or a trivia question.
The Beats studied the poetry of Blake and Rimbaud to rediscover life’s mystery in an uptight, homogenized America. But today’s hipster has a lot more junk to sift through, owing to the cult of celebrity that sprang up in large part because of the ‘hip‘ thing:
Have you read the poetry of Ann Sexton, Sylvia Plath and Derrick Brown? Is Yo La Tengo on your iPod? Are you up to date on Jay-Z’s Auto-Tune controversy? Do you know what Mudhoney meant to Kurt Cobain? What’s the Pulitzer Prize-winning novel written by Richard Ford? Why did Suge Knight have it in for Puff Daddy before he became P. Diddy? Does Jay MacInerny still matter? Can you name the top five Coen brother’s films? Have you read Cormac McCarthy’s Border Trilogy? What’s the difference between Mudvayne and Slipknot? Who is (or were) Karen O, the People Under the Stairs, Anna Wintour, Ute Lemper, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Fred ‘Sonic’ Smith, Sugarland, Bebe Gilberto, Albert Grossman, Brandon Flowers, the “It” Girl, John Sayles, Toumani Diabate, Sam Cooke, ICP, Youssou N’Dour, Trent Reznor, Bob Weir, Method Man, FutureMan, Estelle and Buckethead?
These are some of the easier questions on the hip learning curve, which to paraphrase H.L. Mencken, requires knowing “one million useless things.“ No doubt there’s some Maynard G. Krebs out there in Northern Michigan who has all the answers.
But maybe not, because Northern Michigan has a way of squeezing the “hipness” right out of people. You want a bunch of blasè hipsters, check out the baristas at the coffeehouses down in Royal Oak; up here it’s like people pass through a de-hip-notizing ray as soon as they get past Gladwin. Cynical, alienated hipsters arrive at the 45th Parallel and are transformed into optimistic, wholesome types who have a hard time squeaking out a sneer now and then.
So here’s to the death of hip, again. Long live hip.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5