Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters
. . . .


- November 23rd, 2009
Stupak & women
In response to the article on the Stupak amendment by Anne Stanton in the November 16 Northern Express Weekly:
Congressman Stupak, you claim in the article that National Public Radio says some groups that oppose your amendment are misrepresenting the facts. I, too, listened to the NPR analysis of your abortion ban amendment, and clearly we heard two different things.
Whereas you heard, “Keeps the law the same,” I heard, “Makes permanent a law that currently has to be renewed every year,” and, “Abortion rights could be curtailed if this bill becomes law.”
I think we both heard, “Women still have the option to buy an extra rider to cover abortion services.” Although being a woman, I think my interpretation was a little different than yours. Mr. Stupak.
I have likely never been as insulted by anyone as you at that moment in my life. I actually yelled at the nice NPR anchor. “Women do not plan unplanned pregnancies! We plan the births of our children. We plan on providing for them. We plan every last penny in our lives in order to do so! What a ridiculous notion that we will be without coverage because we didn’t plan to have an abortion.”
Hide behind the “we’ve got to get this thing passed” rhetoric all you want. But what I just heard was, “Women be damned.”
If we are poor, federal employees, members of the military, receiving Indian Health Insurance, on Medicaid, on disability, hoping for a public option, likely to receive federal subsidies on a public option – if we are in fact the women who already pay more for our medical costs than men because we pay for years of reproductive health coverage like birth control – then what I just heard was, “You are my Political Pawn.”
I would encourage men and women alike to contact their representatives and ask them to oppose this amendment.
Maybe then what I will hear from you, Congressman Stupak, is an apology.

Jennifer Kirkpatrick Johnson
• Kingsley

Protect the pristine U.P.
It’s a shame when publicly elected officials become the mouthpiece for pro-mining propaganda. Not only did state legislators Mike Prusi, Michael Lahti, Steven Lindberg, Judy Nerat, and Jason Allen blatantly misrepresent attempts to protect the economy and environment of Upper Michigan, they failed to recognize the largest part of the U.P.’s economy. It is our position that if legislators do not have the time to read and research what they are commenting on, they should refrain from doing so.
The movement to prevent pollution and degradation to the water and wilderness of the U.P. started in the hearts and minds of local concerned citizens decades ago. For the past eight years, small-town folk in Marquette County and across the U.P. have thwarted the attempts of foreign mining companies who would irreversibly contaminate the Great Lakes Region for financial gain. It has taken the same amount of time to rally any attention to this issue from downstate Michigan, and we are proud to endorse MIWater leadership in spearheading the ballot initiative that will further protect our resources.
Recreational and environmental tourism is the lifeblood of Upper Michigan’s economy. Visitation to the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore alone generates $100 million over a five-year period, (based on 2008 figures) which is $30 million more than what the proposed Eagle Mine would produce. Tourism doesn’t impose heavy utility lines, toxic tailings, industrial roads into remote, wild areas, or threaten the water quality of our local watersheds and Great Lakes.
Finally, the ballot initiative DOES NOT “ban mining” as our legislators erroneously assert. Currently no rules exist for uranium mining, so logically we need tough regulations to mine an intensely toxic and radioactive substance to protect health and water quality. The same can be said for sulfide mining that threatens our pure water with hard-to-control acid mine drainage. New ballot legislation would safeguard our resources by strengthening the existing mining law.
The Upper Peninsula is our homeland. The U.P. plays host to people from around the world who seek natural beauty, recreational opportunities, small town charm and a rich quality of life. The movement to protect the Upper Peninsula began here, and will continue to be fiercely supported by those who understand the trade-off of higher wages for quality of life.
It is time to invent new and sustainable solutions for our employment woes instead of taking easy money from foreign investors that will ‘boom and bust’ Michigan and leave our land and water in a shambles. One would expect our legislators to feel the same way.

Kristi A. Mills • Director,
Save the Wild UP

Our race against China
Let’s re-power America with clean energy before China does.
The slow response to energy and climate legislation is already starting to affect the United States. The New York Times recently published an article talking about how China will be solely supplying one of the largest wind farm producers in America with wind turbines. China -- not the United States -- will be supplying the turbine components for wind farms that will be built in the U.S. These are components that should be manufactured right here in Michigan, but instead are being bought from foreign countries, sending our money overseas once again.
China, not the United States, has set in place $400 to $660 billion to invest in clean, renewable energy sources as well, according to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.
Our senators need to take a serious look at the potential Michigan has to be a leader in a clean energy future.
As Americans, we’re expected to be leaders, and now is the time to show the world we are prepared to take courageous leaps forward with bold climate and energy legislation that will power our country and our future with 100% clean, renewable energy sources.
Now is the time to act, China already is. Will we be left behind? It’s time to get real. Let’s re-power America.

Kevin Numerick • TC

Labors of love
Rick Coates’ Nov. 16 story: “Let’s Eat,” about Sandra Svec and the Community Meals program she founded, reminds me of a song by Peter Boland titled “Martin King and Corretta.”
“But the living proof of the gospel truth, is marching with your own two feet” are lyrics which easily describe Sandra and George as they have dished out dignity along with the countless meals served. Our entire community is richer from their labors of love.

Brad Purcell • TC

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5