Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Features · An Ocean without fish
. . . .

An Ocean without fish

Harley L. Sachs - May 3rd, 2010
An Ocean Without Fish
Forget global warming -- carbonic acid could spell ‘curtains’
When we think of acid we may think of acetic acid (vinegar), battery acid (sulfuric), and even ascorbic acid (vitamin C), the last of which is used as a preservative and puts the zing in certain candies kids love. But chances are, we don’t think of carbonic acid, the result of the ionization of CO2, which puts the bite in carbonated drinks. Yet carbonic acid could well mean the end of the human race.
Whether you believe that global warming is a man-made phenomenon or a natural cycle of earth’s evolving climate changes, one issue is certain and alarming. It’s the impact of carbonic acid, the acidification of the oceans because of CO2 emissions. Since the Industrial Revolution began, the production of CO2 through the burning of fossil fuels has increased enormously and about a third of it has been absorbed by the oceans. We’re talking millions of tons.

When CO2 is absorbed in water it ionizes. In the sea the result is a change in the Ph and a carbonizing of the water.
The trouble is, in an acidic solution, certain creatures cannot build their calcium shells. Corals are built of calcium deposits, and the acidification of the sea means a deterioration of the barrier reefs some islands depend on for their defense against storms. Coral reefs are also the home of fish that island people depend on for their livelihood. In fact, coral reefs are also the habitat of millions of sea creatures. No coral, no critters.
Other creatures that must build shells of calcium are marine plankton and shellfish such as oysters, lobsters, scallops, mussels, clams, sea urchins, and crabs. Marine plankton are, of course, the food for some whales.
Other affected creatures are sea snails called pteropods. Shelled pteropods are what are eaten by salmon, mackerel, herring, and cod.

What we’re talking about here is the base of the food chain we are a part of. Loss of those tiny critters because of acidification means the loss of the foods we eat.
We have already seen the effects of acid rain on the lakes in the Adirondacks of New York State. That acid came from sulfur dioxide emitted from coal-fired power plants and diesel exhaust turning into sulfuric acid. Those lakes became sterile: clear acidic water where nothing lived. Cleaning up diesel fuel and scrubbing smokestacks reduced acid rain, but there seems to be no stopping the impact of CO2.
It’s not just CO2 as a greenhouse gas that’s the issue or its alleged impact on global warming. It’s about what we eat. Over a million species of sea creatures are affected by the acidification of the sea.
There is a wealth of information on this subject available on the Internet. There are conferences, scientific papers and a three year grant you can apply for. Documentary films including Acid Test, and Planet Green’ series Blue August. offer warnings. Download these films and imagine an ocean without fish.
Can this acidification be reversed? The damage has been sneaking up on us for a long time, increasing ever since steam engines began burning coal. Now China is building a coal-fired power plant every week.
When it comes to CO2 emissions there is no such thing as clean coal. Schemes to pump smoke stack gasses into the earth can never counteract a couple of centuries of emissions. In spite of the introduction of hybrid automobiles to reduce the need for foreign oil, and consequently less CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels, every human activity produces more CO2.. If you heat your home with gas, wood, or oil, you produce more CO2. If you are on the grid, your electric power probably comes from coal or gas-fired power plants. Burning biomass is still combustion and produces CO2. Even when you exhale you produce CO2.
How much more can the oceans absorb? We hope it is not too late. Don’t hold your breath.

Visit the web site www.hu.mtu.edu/~hlsachs where you can listen to two stories, read a third, read reviews, and find links to the publishers of my books.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5