Letters

Letters 09-26-2016

Welcome To 1984 The Democrat Party, the government education complex, private corporations and foundations, the news media and the allpervasive sports and entertainment industry have incrementally repressed the foundational right of We the People to publicly debate open borders, forced immigration, sanctuary cities and the calamitous destruction of innate gender norms...

Grow Up, Kachadurian Apparently Tom Kachadurian has great words; too bad they make little sense. His Sept. 19 editorial highlights his prevalent beliefs that only Hillary and the Dems are engaged in namecalling and polarizing actions. Huh? What rock does he live under up on Old Mission...

Facts MatterThomas Kachadurian’s “In the Basket” opinion deliberately chooses to twist what Clinton said. He chooses to argue that her basket lumped all into the clearly despicable categories of the racist, sexist, homophobic , etc. segments of the alt right...

Turn Off Fox, Kachadurian I read Thomas Kachadurian’s opinion letter in last week’s issue. It seemed this opinion was the product of someone who offered nothing but what anyone could hear 24/7/365 on Fox News; a one-sided slime job that has been done better by Fox than this writer every day of the year...

Let’s Fix This Political Process Enough! We have been embroiled in the current election cycle for…well, over a year, or is it almost two? What is the benefit of this insanity? Exorbitant amounts of money are spent, candidates are under the microscope day and night, the media – now in action 24/7 – focuses on anything and everything anyone does, and then analyzes until the next event, and on it goes...

Can’t Cut Taxes 

We are in a different place today. The slogan, “Making America Great Again” begs the questions, “great for whom?” and “when was it great?” I have claimed my generation has lived in a bubble since WWII, which has offered a prosperity for a majority of the people. The bubble has burst over the last few decades. The jobs which provided a good living for people without a college degree are vanishing. Unions, which looked out for the welfare of employees, have been shrinking. Businesses have sought to produce goods where labor is not expensive...

Wrong About Clinton In response to Thomas Kachadurian’s column, I have to take issue with many of his points. First, his remarks about Ms. Clinton’s statement regarding Trump supporters was misleading. She was referring to a large segment of his supporters, not all. And the sad fact is that her statement was not a “smug notion.” Rather, it was the sad truth, as witnessed by the large turnout of new voters in the primaries and the ugly incidents at so many of his rallies...

Home · Articles · News · Features · An Ocean without fish
. . . .

An Ocean without fish

Harley L. Sachs - May 3rd, 2010
An Ocean Without Fish
Forget global warming -- carbonic acid could spell ‘curtains’
When we think of acid we may think of acetic acid (vinegar), battery acid (sulfuric), and even ascorbic acid (vitamin C), the last of which is used as a preservative and puts the zing in certain candies kids love. But chances are, we don’t think of carbonic acid, the result of the ionization of CO2, which puts the bite in carbonated drinks. Yet carbonic acid could well mean the end of the human race.
Whether you believe that global warming is a man-made phenomenon or a natural cycle of earth’s evolving climate changes, one issue is certain and alarming. It’s the impact of carbonic acid, the acidification of the oceans because of CO2 emissions. Since the Industrial Revolution began, the production of CO2 through the burning of fossil fuels has increased enormously and about a third of it has been absorbed by the oceans. We’re talking millions of tons.

KILLING SEA CREATURES
When CO2 is absorbed in water it ionizes. In the sea the result is a change in the Ph and a carbonizing of the water.
The trouble is, in an acidic solution, certain creatures cannot build their calcium shells. Corals are built of calcium deposits, and the acidification of the sea means a deterioration of the barrier reefs some islands depend on for their defense against storms. Coral reefs are also the home of fish that island people depend on for their livelihood. In fact, coral reefs are also the habitat of millions of sea creatures. No coral, no critters.
Other creatures that must build shells of calcium are marine plankton and shellfish such as oysters, lobsters, scallops, mussels, clams, sea urchins, and crabs. Marine plankton are, of course, the food for some whales.
Other affected creatures are sea snails called pteropods. Shelled pteropods are what are eaten by salmon, mackerel, herring, and cod.

KILLING THE FOOD CHAIN
What we’re talking about here is the base of the food chain we are a part of. Loss of those tiny critters because of acidification means the loss of the foods we eat.
We have already seen the effects of acid rain on the lakes in the Adirondacks of New York State. That acid came from sulfur dioxide emitted from coal-fired power plants and diesel exhaust turning into sulfuric acid. Those lakes became sterile: clear acidic water where nothing lived. Cleaning up diesel fuel and scrubbing smokestacks reduced acid rain, but there seems to be no stopping the impact of CO2.
It’s not just CO2 as a greenhouse gas that’s the issue or its alleged impact on global warming. It’s about what we eat. Over a million species of sea creatures are affected by the acidification of the sea.
There is a wealth of information on this subject available on the Internet. There are conferences, scientific papers and a three year grant you can apply for. Documentary films including Acid Test, and Planet Green’ series Blue August. offer warnings. Download these films and imagine an ocean without fish.
Can this acidification be reversed? The damage has been sneaking up on us for a long time, increasing ever since steam engines began burning coal. Now China is building a coal-fired power plant every week.
When it comes to CO2 emissions there is no such thing as clean coal. Schemes to pump smoke stack gasses into the earth can never counteract a couple of centuries of emissions. In spite of the introduction of hybrid automobiles to reduce the need for foreign oil, and consequently less CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels, every human activity produces more CO2.. If you heat your home with gas, wood, or oil, you produce more CO2. If you are on the grid, your electric power probably comes from coal or gas-fired power plants. Burning biomass is still combustion and produces CO2. Even when you exhale you produce CO2.
How much more can the oceans absorb? We hope it is not too late. Don’t hold your breath.

Visit the web site www.hu.mtu.edu/~hlsachs where you can listen to two stories, read a third, read reviews, and find links to the publishers of my books.


 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close