Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Beyond Petroleum
. . . .

Beyond Petroleum

Robert Downes - June 14th, 2010
Beyond Petroleum
More than 20,000 suggestions on how to stop the oil spill in the Gulf
of Mexico have been received by British Petroleum since its Deepwater
Horizon oil platform went up in flames this spring.
But some of us are wondering, what comes after that titanic rip in the
ocean is repaired?
If there’s any justice, BP will come to be known as an acronym for the
ruined company that took us Beyond Petroleum.
No one is torching their Suburbans or Hummers over this, not even
along the coast of Louisiana, but it’s no stretch to say that public
revulsion and disgust is gushing on par with the Deepwater Horizon,
and beneath that rage is the realization that we’re as addicted to an
ugly substance as any crack addict. Oil runs in our nation’s veins,
seeping from our wallets, clouding our skies and fouling our lungs.
Scenes of pelicans, fish and sea turtles slathered in petroleum slip
through the airwaves on the nightly news, along with the greasy sludge
reaching the Gulf shores. It seems beyond reason that this toxic
horror show will drag on until August at best; and if the “leak” isn’t
fixed (a funny word for it) the lard engulfing our shores could run
all the way from southern Texas to the currents sweeping
Massachusetts. Possibly even to Europe.
Last week, there was an endless barrage of blah, blah, blah on the
tube as the cable news parrots criticized President Obama for not
looking angrier about the disaster.
But would you look angry if you were getting ready to stick a knife in
a wild pig? Or would you look calculating? Our president must know
that to do anything meaningful about the situation with BP (short of
launching a cruise missile at their headquarters in Westminster) will
require tossing the world of deepwater drilling, imported oil and our
existing car culture on the junk heap of history.
That’s when you’re going to hear some real howls from the public, who
want Big Government to handle the oil spill, but with no meddling in
what it takes to fix this disaster for all time. Even now, some
job-dependent residents of the Gulf are complaining about the 6-month
moratorium on deepwater drilling, despite the crud that‘s gumming
their beaches and killing their fish.
Still, at a time when shouting “Drill, baby, drill” now seems an
obscene joke, we have an historic opportunity to use our rage to
transform the world.
It has happened before. Sort of.
During the energy crisis of the 1970s, when OPEC put a cork in the
amount of oil it was willing to sell to America, our government
created CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards to increase
the miles per gallon that automakers had to achieve before bringing
their vehicles to market. The idea was to improve the mileage of
vehicles nationwide and reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
CAFE standards raised mileage on passenger cars, but Congress gave
light trucks and SUVs a break under the rationale that it didn‘t want
to create hardships for farmers, who were locked in their own farm
crisis at the time.
That decision allowed CAFE standards to become a bit of a joke: Once
the oil crisis of the ’70s was over, Americans ditched their small
cars -- the miserable Gremlins, Pintos and LeCars -- and migrated en
masse to light trucks and SUVs, which get terrible mileage to this
And American automakers have pissed and moaned ever since the ’70s
that they can‘t compete with higher CAFE standards, all while the
Japanese and Koreans have captured the small car market doing just
that with imaginative, stylish vehicles.
The current CAFE standard for automobiles is 27.5 miles per gallon,
with 22.5 mpg for SUVs and trucks. It will rise to 35.5 mpg by 2016
for cars.
But since the Deepwater Horizon disaster, there‘s at least one
proposal for a mileage increase of 40 mpg for all foreign carmakers
within the next two years, with U.S. carmakers to follow suit within
two years after that. Now is the time for President Obama to go on TV
and look really, really, really angry and pitch the idea to a riled-up
Our president could also mobilize the nation with a World War II-style
commitment to electric vehicles. Our factories in Detroit turned on a
dime in the early 1940s to build tens of thousands of tanks and
bombers. Why not electric cars? Don’t we taxpayers still own 60% of
General Motors? Why not put them to work in order to put the BPs and
oil tyrants of the world out of business?
Of course, that would probably mean uttering the “n” word, meaning a
renewed nuclear power program to get us off our dual coal addiction
and provide the electricity for those vehicles. The new generation of
nuclear power plants currently being built in France and China are
smaller, safer, and consume much of their own nuclear waste. Given
the problems of fossil fuels, nuclear power deserves a second look.
A commitment to electric cars would also mean reinventing the nation’s
power grid to accommodate massive amounts of solar and wind energy.
All told, think of the potential jobs -- not to mention the health of
our nation -- just waiting for the words, “Let’s move beyond

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5