Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · The war we cannot win
. . . .

The war we cannot win

Stephen Tuttle - June 7th, 2010
The War We Cannot Win
The White House has announced they are going to take a new approach to
the country’s endless battle against drugs and drug use, focusing their
efforts on a public health approach – education and rehabilitation –
instead of continuing the futility of a criminal justice approach. Maybe
this is a good idea given that we’ve been getting our asses kicked in the
half century long “war on drugs”.
Politicians absolutely love this war on drugs. It gives them a chance,
especially those who never served in a real war, the opportunity to talk
tough, use a lot of military jargon, pose for photo-ops with various drug
task forces and posture for campaigns.
It was President Eisenhower who first mentioned waging a “war against drug
addiction” way back in 1954. That approach might have actually made some
sense but subsequent politicians wouldn’t leave well enough alone.
Richard Nixon took things up several notches with his declaration of a war
on drugs in 1969. It was primarily an over-reaction to the Woodstock
generation, which he hated and never understood. Anti-war protestors
gathering in front of the White House and on the Capital Mall as marijuana
smoke wafted through the air very nearly drove him insane as the Nixon
tapes still being released prove. His profane responses to those dirty,
long-haired hippies (he really believed we were all commies) now seem
almost comical but the consequences of his drug war have not been at all
amusing. The creation of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in
1973 didn’t help much. And any politician who stood up to the excesses of
ever more intrusive and Draconian anti-drug laws did so at the peril to
their own careers.
We started the war on drugs losing and it’s fair to say we haven’t won a
single day since.
There is little evidence we’ve done much to decrease usage of anything.
Drug-related crime is more a function of the expensive black market drug
prices than the drugs themselves. And this war has been astonishingly
expensive. No one seems to be able to put a specific price tag on it but
most everyone agrees it is in the trillions of dollars spent.
Law enforcement has been dutifully fulfilling their end of the bargain at
great risk to themselves enforcing laws they did not create and fighting a
tide they cannot stop. Nearly half our prisoners in federal custody are
there on drug related crimes. State prisons are a bit less than that but
not much. Never mind that the costs of imprisoning someone for a year are
nearly twice that of an average drug rehabilitation program. Even worse,
we typically put drug offenders in prison for several years while a decent
rehab program might take only several months. And never mind that drug
laws have allowed authorities to seize homes, bank accounts and other
property without ever charging the owners of that property with any crime
at all.
Sending folks to prison or seizing their property lets politicians be
tough on drugs while supporting rehabilitation programs makes those same
politicians vulnerable to accusations of being soft on drugs. So the
losing war rages on.
What is especially ironic in all of this is the deadliest and costliest
drugs are perfectly legal. Alcohol and nicotine together kill hundreds of
thousands every year, destroy even more lives and cost us billions and
billions of dollars annually in lost productivity and healthcare expenses.
Politicians do little about those drugs except seize the opportunity to
slap new taxes on them. Perfectly legal prescription drugs rack up more
overdose deaths every year than all the illegal drugs combined. And that
doesn’t even count the 100,000 or so annual deaths in hospitals from
accidental drug overdoses, fatal drug interactions and adverse reactions.
We should have learned our lesson from the experience of Prohibition.
That did little to curb alcohol consumption but it did give us Al
Capone and the emergence of the American Mafia, much as the war on
drugs has given us violent drug cartels and a wide variety of street
thugs.
None of which is to suggest illegal drugs are benign. They most surely
are not. They are especially destructive when ingested by young people
whose brains and bodies are still developing.
But the war on drugs has been at least as bad as the drugs themselves. We
do know how to reduce usage without filling up our prisons or encouraging
drug gangs. We’ve had tremendous success with anti-tobacco efforts
through a long, steady public education effort that has finally made
tobacco use decidedly uncool. We also know that public health
interventions and rehabilitation programs do work.
This fall California will decide whether or not to legalize marijuana once
and for all and apply a significant state tax to its sale. At least part
of that money will be used in consistent public education campaigns to
discourage children from pot use and intervention and rehab programs to
help those who decide to do it anyway. It will save California billions
of dollars now being spent on the criminal justice system and earn them
hundreds of millions in tax revenues.
The public is ready to stop the futility of our war on drugs. The
politicians, as is almost always the case, still lag behind. But it is
time for the tough-talking pols to admit their rhetoric and laws have done
little and begin a strategic retreat from a war we cannot and will not
win.

Stephen Tuttle is a political consultant who formerly wrote for the
Arizona Republic.


 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close