Letters

Letters 10-20-2014

Doctor Dan? After several email conversations with Rep. Benishek, he has confirmed that he doesn’t have a clue of what he does. Here’s why...

In Favor Of Our Parks [Traverse] City Proposal 1 is a creative way to improve our city parks without using our tax dollars. By using a small portion of our oil and gas royalties from the Brown Bridge Trust Fund, our parks can be improved for our children and grandchildren.

From January 1970 Popular Mechanics: “Drastic climate changes will occur within the next 50 years if the use of fossil fuels keeps rising at current rates.” That warning comes from Eugene K. Peterson of the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management.

Newcomers Might Leave: Recently we had guests from India who came over as students with the plan to stay in America. He has a master’s degree in engineering and she is doing her residency in Chicago and plans to specialize in oncology. They talked very candidly about American politics and said that after observing...

Someone Is You: On Sept 21, I joined the 400,000 who took to the streets of New York in the People’s Climate March, followed by a UN Climate Summit and many speeches. On October 13, the Pentagon issued a report calling climate change a significant threat to national security requiring immediate action. How do we move from marches, speeches and reports to meaningful work on this problem? In NYC I read a sign with a simple answer...

Necessary To Pay: Last fall, Grand Traverse voters authorized a new tax to fix roads. It is good, it is necessary.

The Real Reasons for Wolf Hunt: I have really been surprised that no one has been commenting on the true reason for the wolf hunt. All this effort has not been expended so 23 wolves can be killed each year. Instead this manufactured controversy about the wolf hunt has been very carefully crafted to get Proposal 14-2 passed.

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Beyond Petroleum
. . . .

Beyond Petroleum

Robert Downes - June 14th, 2010
Beyond Petroleum
More than 20,000 suggestions on how to stop the oil spill in the Gulf
of Mexico have been received by British Petroleum since its Deepwater
Horizon oil platform went up in flames this spring.
But some of us are wondering, what comes after that titanic rip in the
ocean is repaired?
If there’s any justice, BP will come to be known as an acronym for the
ruined company that took us Beyond Petroleum.
No one is torching their Suburbans or Hummers over this, not even
along the coast of Louisiana, but it’s no stretch to say that public
revulsion and disgust is gushing on par with the Deepwater Horizon,
and beneath that rage is the realization that we’re as addicted to an
ugly substance as any crack addict. Oil runs in our nation’s veins,
seeping from our wallets, clouding our skies and fouling our lungs.
Scenes of pelicans, fish and sea turtles slathered in petroleum slip
through the airwaves on the nightly news, along with the greasy sludge
reaching the Gulf shores. It seems beyond reason that this toxic
horror show will drag on until August at best; and if the “leak” isn’t
fixed (a funny word for it) the lard engulfing our shores could run
all the way from southern Texas to the currents sweeping
Massachusetts. Possibly even to Europe.
Last week, there was an endless barrage of blah, blah, blah on the
tube as the cable news parrots criticized President Obama for not
looking angrier about the disaster.
But would you look angry if you were getting ready to stick a knife in
a wild pig? Or would you look calculating? Our president must know
that to do anything meaningful about the situation with BP (short of
launching a cruise missile at their headquarters in Westminster) will
require tossing the world of deepwater drilling, imported oil and our
existing car culture on the junk heap of history.
That’s when you’re going to hear some real howls from the public, who
want Big Government to handle the oil spill, but with no meddling in
what it takes to fix this disaster for all time. Even now, some
job-dependent residents of the Gulf are complaining about the 6-month
moratorium on deepwater drilling, despite the crud that‘s gumming
their beaches and killing their fish.
Still, at a time when shouting “Drill, baby, drill” now seems an
obscene joke, we have an historic opportunity to use our rage to
transform the world.
It has happened before. Sort of.
During the energy crisis of the 1970s, when OPEC put a cork in the
amount of oil it was willing to sell to America, our government
created CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards to increase
the miles per gallon that automakers had to achieve before bringing
their vehicles to market. The idea was to improve the mileage of
vehicles nationwide and reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
CAFE standards raised mileage on passenger cars, but Congress gave
light trucks and SUVs a break under the rationale that it didn‘t want
to create hardships for farmers, who were locked in their own farm
crisis at the time.
That decision allowed CAFE standards to become a bit of a joke: Once
the oil crisis of the ’70s was over, Americans ditched their small
cars -- the miserable Gremlins, Pintos and LeCars -- and migrated en
masse to light trucks and SUVs, which get terrible mileage to this
day.
And American automakers have pissed and moaned ever since the ’70s
that they can‘t compete with higher CAFE standards, all while the
Japanese and Koreans have captured the small car market doing just
that with imaginative, stylish vehicles.
The current CAFE standard for automobiles is 27.5 miles per gallon,
with 22.5 mpg for SUVs and trucks. It will rise to 35.5 mpg by 2016
for cars.
But since the Deepwater Horizon disaster, there‘s at least one
proposal for a mileage increase of 40 mpg for all foreign carmakers
within the next two years, with U.S. carmakers to follow suit within
two years after that. Now is the time for President Obama to go on TV
and look really, really, really angry and pitch the idea to a riled-up
nation.
Our president could also mobilize the nation with a World War II-style
commitment to electric vehicles. Our factories in Detroit turned on a
dime in the early 1940s to build tens of thousands of tanks and
bombers. Why not electric cars? Don’t we taxpayers still own 60% of
General Motors? Why not put them to work in order to put the BPs and
oil tyrants of the world out of business?
Of course, that would probably mean uttering the “n” word, meaning a
renewed nuclear power program to get us off our dual coal addiction
and provide the electricity for those vehicles. The new generation of
nuclear power plants currently being built in France and China are
smaller, safer, and consume much of their own nuclear waste. Given
the problems of fossil fuels, nuclear power deserves a second look.
A commitment to electric cars would also mean reinventing the nation’s
power grid to accommodate massive amounts of solar and wind energy.
All told, think of the potential jobs -- not to mention the health of
our nation -- just waiting for the words, “Let’s move beyond
petroleum.”

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close