Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Rough road ahead
. . . .

Rough road ahead

Robert Downes - February 15th, 2010
Rough Road Ahead
City government has dropped the ball on two occasions involving road issues over the past year in Traverse City, and some residents are wondering how we managed to get so far off course.
As a result of these embarrassing, counter-productive gaffs, some feel that a city which prides itself on being a beacon of progress has been set back years.
It started with the news last year that the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) had plans to simply resurface Division Street, the north-south artery that funnels thousands of cars from West Bayshore to Meijer’s and the mall.
Advocates of “traffic calming,“ including TART Trails, protested that MDOT’s plan was short-sighted and inadequate. They argued that the time was right to re-engineer Division as a safer, slower route that would take pedestrians and cyclists into account.
But the die had already been cast, and apparently, the City of Traverse City had been asleep at the switch when it came to educating MDOT on what hundreds of local citizens desired via the recent Grand Vision study. MDOT shot back with a “like it or lump it” message and we got no upgrade for Division Street whatsoever.
Last week, there was an uproar over a near-identical situation with nearly identical results. In the current debacle, MDOT is moving ahead with a plan to resurface 8th Street, the corridor that runs east-west across mid-town.
Too late to offer their input, bicycle advocates learned that the plan is virtually set in concrete in MDOT’s view. Federal and state funds have been committed to the project, so we’ve got another “like it or lump it” situation: either Traverse City moves ahead with a plan from the city engineer that had little citizen input, or we lose close to $1 million in road dollars.
Last week, more than 100 members of TART Trails and the Cherry Capital Cycling Club vented their dismay at a city commission meeting. TART Trails Director Bob Otwell presented a plan that would provide for traffic calming on 8th Street along with bike lanes, the planting of new trees, and BATA bus stops.
The plan is a good fit for TC’s Master Plan, the Grand Vision, and the spirit of a new bill going through the U.S. Senate that calls for a national commitment to pedestrian- and cycle-friendly roads.
Plus, it would take no great shakes to accomplish. The major “improvement“ would involve simply restriping the street to include bike lanes.
But tweaking the plan would of course be impossible in MDOT’s view. Instead, Traverse City would be required to ditch the whole project and start all over, possibly losing its transportation dollars.
As such, the mayor and commission are seeking a third option, possibly including an expensive retrofit of 8th Street once the current plan that everyone seems to hate is implemented.
Here’s an idea: perhaps TC needs a sort of ‘ambassador’ or delegation to MDOT that could establish diplomatic ties with the road bureaucracy to beg the favor of their royal highnesses and plead the wishes of the local peasantry.
Why? Because as several cyclists and physicians pointed out at last week’s meeting, this isn’t about just roads -- it’s about public health. Times have changed and we’re moving toward a society where pedestrians, bicycles and mass transit are seen as positive alternatives to the pollution, waste and danger of America’s car culture.
On that score, 8th Street is a bummer. One resident noted that due to its fumes and the roar of traffic, it is one of the most unpleasant streets in town to walk down (much less travel by bicycle).
“Horrible” would be more on target. Eighth Street is like the straightaway stretch in a roller derby where cars jockey back and forth for position, run red lights, and exceed the 25 mph limit by nearly twice that speed at times. Not to mention drivers texting and fiddling with their cell phones. Cyclists: if you’re looking for an assisted suicide conduit, this is it.
As one citizen notes, we need to change the “psychology” of 8th Street from its current status as Thunder Alley to a far calmer thoroughfare before anyone considers cycling alongside its traffic. Even if MDOT relents and allows a more enlightened plan to go through, the addition of bike lanes alone won’t fix 8th Street unless there is some very thoughtful and inventive input on traffic calming.

A Burning Question
Here’s a appeal to attend the forum on “Biomass: A Burning Question” being offered by NMEAC on Monday, Feb. 22 at 6:30 p.m. at the Traverse Area District Library.
Traverse City Light & Power has held four pro-biomass meetings for the creation of several wood-burning plants in the area.
As stated here before, however, biomass is a short-sighted, non-solution that seems likely to wreak irreparable harm on Northern Michigan’s forests as one power plant after another consumes the trees that sustain the region’s tourism and recreational lifestyle.
It has been argued that biomass represents the cheapest power source for alternative energy at present, compared to wind, water or solar.
One might argue that you could also burn your garage for fuel, and then the upper story of your home, and your furniture along with the dog and cat, and so on. But would that be wise?
Assuming that our forests are an expendable, endless “resource“ for burning is a reckless interpretation of alternative power. Once those forests are gone, the spirit of Northern Michigan will go up in smoke with them -- and so will our tourism and recreation-based economy.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close