Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · Reforming the educational...
. . . .

Reforming the educational reformers

Stephen Tuttle - October 4th, 2010
Reforming the education reformers
Education reform is suddenly all the rage. It seems our public schools
are failing. This is apparently some kind of revelation for the
reporters and politicians, though our schools have been on a downward
slide for about three decades.
According to some, including Michelle Rhee, the controversial
chancellor of Washington, D.C.’s bizarrely bad school system, this is
the responsibility of teachers. As the husband of a former teacher,
I’ve heard some resistance to that notion around the house.
So, we’re going to see another wave of education reform. Words like
“innovative” and “revolutionary” and “commitment” will be tossed
around like juggler’s clubs. We’ll be told it is essential in order
to keep our children competitive with the rest of the world. We’ll be
told our children must attend school longer and be held accountable in
a more rigorous academic environment. We’ll be told teachers will
also be held accountable and we’ll have student test scores to
establish whether or not those teachers are high performers who should
be rewarded or hindrances to progress who should be fired.
It’ll be great. In four or five years we’ll do it all over again.
The our-public-education-is-failing alarm bells ring every few years
as we’re told our schools are falling farther and farther behind
places like China, Japan, South Korea and a handful of European
countries. But it’s unlikely we’re ever going to follow the Chinese
model of 10-hour school days, sometimes six days a week. Nor will we
follow the Japanese model that also includes inordinately long school
days and a societal imperative for excellence that puts so much
pressure on school children that suicide is one of the leading causes
of death for kids. And we certainly are not going to accept the level
of taxation that follows the European model.
Still, we do have problems. Some schools seem to be run by fads,
bouncing from one new program to another, always searching and never
quite finding that magic bullet. Drop-out rates in many schools have
reached an obscene level with barely half the students hanging around
to graduate. In other schools, most notably those in New York City,
the union contracts are so preposterous that bad teachers can almost
hold the entire system hostage. And, of course, there are some bad
teachers and some bad administrators and it has become far too
difficult to remove that dead wood.
Some believe charter schools, public schools given the leeway to think
and act in untraditional ways, are the answer. On balance, though,
charter schools perform no better than traditional public schools. In
Arizona, where the charter school movement took flight, with far more
charter schools per capita than anywhere else, there are a handful of
charters nationally recognized for academic rigor and excellence.
There are also charters that have had abysmal records and been run by
charlatans. The vast majority of charters there perform about the
same as any other public school.
More money is not necessarily the answer, either. Washington, D.C.
leads the nation in public school spending at a whopping $19,000 per
student, yet has a dismal record and little more than a third of
their students can even read at grade level. (Having said that,
Michigan’s manifestly unfair system of school funding has been a
crippler for many schools in Northern Michigan. At the very least,
every school should receive the same per-pupil financing.)
What’s been lost in this discussion of innovative new programs,
holding teachers accountable and funding disparities is the role of
parents and the disappearance of the teacher-parent alliance of the
past. Too often that relationship is now adversarial.
Parental involvement has to be more than causing trouble at the
next Board of Education meeting or attempting to control the
curriculum or intervening and threatening a lawsuit every time their
little charmer is disciplined for attacking another student with a
hatchet. Parents can help teachers in several very basic but
incredibly important ways. Does your child eat nutritious meals? Get
a good night’s sleep? Have a place where he/she can seriously
undertake homework? Do you look at the homework? Do you read the
notices that are sent home with your student? Check on the web sites
of your children’s school and teacher? Do you volunteer at school?
Do you and your child know what is expected both in terms of classroom
work and behavior? Did you ask?
There is a ton of research that indicates those children who do best
at school come from homes that genuinely value education. Those
parents become significant assets to their children’s teachers and
partners in the education process. That allows teachers, the
overwhelming majority of whom are hardworking, dedicated individuals
genuinely trying to help our children, to dedicate their time and
energy to the classroom.
While we search for that magical, mythical combination that guarantees
the success of our students, we’ve completely ignored what worked only
a few decades ago – a classroom controlled by teachers who are
supported by both their administration and parents; students who are
expected to behave and perform and who are subject to consequences
when they do not.
No reform will ever work as long as students can perform and behave
poorly without consequence and administrators quake in fear at the
possibility of a reduced head count or a parental lawsuit. Teachers,
caught in the middle, will be more likely to help our kids achieve
excellence if they have a little help from those now squeezing them.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5