Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Art · Dancing to documents
. . . .

Dancing to documents

Gretchen Eichenberger - October 18th, 2010
Dancing to Documents : An American Heritage
By Gretchen Eichberger
What do you know about your heritage? Many Americans begin their answer with their place of family origin, recalling some handed-down lore, wondering at what they don’t know and perhaps even recall some local history—their own as far as they know. They will leave it at that. When you cast your vote in this upcoming election, will you reflect on your American heritage? Does your vote keep up with the legacy that your ancestors intended, or has it changed? How does dance relate to these questions? Can it? I submit to you that attending American Document a dance–drama inspired by the legendary choreographer and dancer, Martha Graham, might give you pause to re-evaluate the value and meaning of our American heritage and citizenship.
Martha Graham was a major force in the American art of modern dance. Her influence can be compared to that of Frank Lloyd Wright’s on architecture and Pablo Picasso’s on painting. From the mid 1920s until her death in 1991, Graham experimented endlessly with basic human movement, beginning with contraction and release—a legacy that is still felt throughout the world of dance.
Using these principles as the foundation for her technique, she built a vocabulary of movement that would increase the emotional activity of the dancer’s body. Her works were inspired by a wide variety of sources including modern paintings, literature, the American frontier, religious ceremonies of Native American tribes, and Greek mythology. Graham’s innovative ideas integrated philosophy and technique into the academic world.
Premiering in 1938, her piece entitled American Document was a tribute to Graham’s own heritage. The central questions posed throughout the dance were “What is America?” and “What is an American?” It was the first dance work that incorporated spoken word. Texts were drawn from historic records such as the Declaration of Independence, Gettysburg Address and the Emancipation Proclamation, as well as lesser known documents, including words from Puritan minister John Edward’s fire and brimstone sermons and the sorrowful speech of Chief Red Jacket of the Seneca tribe.
Graham indicated that these documents contained the essence of our nation: “Our documents… our legends, our poignantly near history, our folk tales.” She intended for the work to reflect “Americana that is neither political nationalism nor chauvinistic credo, but, rather, a statement.”
When environmental and financial disaster engulfed our country in the 1930s there was a subsequent surge of human expression in the form of modern dance. Martha Graham and her American Document embodied that struggle.

Why and how is this work being performed in Northern Michigan? During an intensive week at the Martha Graham School of Contemporary Dance in New York City, I attended a performance of American Document by the SITI Theater Group and the Graham dancers. I learned that the Graham Foundation was preparing to launch a nation-wide invitation to all civic and student groups interested in creating their own American Documents under the project title, The Political Dance Project. If I began promptly, my adaptation of American Document would be the first civic version in the country. Upon my return to Michigan last year, I began steps to launch the project.
Personifying my own American heritage in such a production seemed like it might ring true for other Michiganders. My father’s family settled in the Detroit area, making their living from the emerging automobile industry. My mother’s family settled in Grand Traverse County, farming acres of land on the Old Mission Peninsula and Garfield Township.
In retrospect, I believe that the understanding of my own American heritage with its immense opportunity for prosperity and abundance of natural resources had brought me to the dilemma that sits in the minds of so many of us. I fear for future generations and can only hope that the same prosperity -- and now -- the concern for the basic right to clean water, soil, and air will be available for them. Those are the feelings that I and the other dancers have attempted to portray in the choreography of this American Document.
A civic adaptation seemed an ideal opportunity to incorporate the texts by Benzonia, Michigan writer, Bruce Catton. Upon his mid-life pursuit of becoming an author, he was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for his civil war book, A Stillness of Appomattox, but it is his boyhood memoir, Waiting for the Morning Train that contains a poignant series of remarks that were a true beacon for our American way of life and what it has become.
Now, nearly 70 years later, during this great shift in climate – both environmentally and socially -- the prediction of what is to become of the planet seems to be on the minds of all citizens. We find ourselves wondering if our great American civilization is destined to fail, for as history repeats itself, all great civilizations have failed. Catton predicted that we were “a generation that lived by applying a steadily increasing knowledge of ingenuity to the exploitation of the earth’s boundless resources; and it was reaching the gates of the golden age only to discover that the boundless stores of resources was beginning to run out.” It is quotes such as these that are incorporated alongside dances in this work.

After adapting the script for our place and time, I was faced with the task of finding a dance troupe, actors, and musicians who were not only willing and able, but who had a social conscience, and could embody the intense emotion so characteristic of a Graham work.
Northwestern Lower Michigan does not host a plethora of contemporary dancers, nor is it versed in the technique of Martha Graham. Nevertheless, this was to be a civic production, “of the people, by the people and for the people.”
To have obtained a diverse group of dancers, each unique in their own right and background as kinesthetic artists, was pure luck. The interlocutors, (a term given to the main speaking characters in a minstrel show) seemed a fitting role for a true patriot -- a person who works tirelessly for the good of all. Holly Wren Spaulding, a writer, poet, designer, and activist stood out in my mind for her work to bring awareness about the dangers of water privatization and importance of water rights. Musician and craftsman, Tim Joseph, a recent recipient of the Don Jennings award for political activism and significant service and achievement, lives to make a difference for the common man. To me, this duo represented our Michigan values, and are both deeply rooted in a sense of place. They were cast as interlocutors and will appear alongside the dancers.
Between the readings, a series of dances portray historical events which at the same time depicts Americans amidst their daily quandaries, fears, and notions; reacting to promises not kept; embracing new opportunity; feeling powerless as well as accomplished after overcoming strife; witnessing great atrocities and surmounting the unthinkable.

Presented by ISLAND (Institute for Sustainable Living, Art, and Natural Design), American Document will be performed at the City Opera House on Saturday, Oct. 23 at 8:00 pm. Tickets are $15 for adults and $8 for students and seniors. Gretchen Eichberger is a director, dancer-choreographer, educator, musician, and historic preservationist. She and her family reside along the shores of Lake Michigan in Benzie County.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5