Letters

Letters 11-24-2014

Dangerous Votes You voted for Dr. Dan. Thanks!Rep. Benishek failed to cosponsor H.R. 601. It stops subsidies for big oil companies. He failed to cosponsor H.R. 1084. There is an exemption for hydraulic fracturing written into the Safe Drinking Water Act. H.R. 1084. It would require the contents of fracking fluids to be publicly disclosed to protect the public health.

Solar Is The Answer There have been many excellent letters about the need for our region, state and nation to take action on climate change. Now there is a viable solution to this ever-growing problem: Solar energy is the future.

Real Minimum Wage In 1966, a first class stamp cost 5 cents and minimum wage was $1.25. Today, a first class stamp is 49 cents, so federal minimum wage should be $11.25.

Doesn’t Seem Warmer I enjoy the “environmentalists” twisting themselves into pretzels trying to convince us that it is getting warmer. Sure it is... 

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · Leaks don‘t kill...
. . . .

Leaks don‘t kill people do, secrets do

Michael Moore - December 20th, 2010
Leaks Don’t Kill People, Secrets Do
By Michael Moore
Last week, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for
WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from
me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr.
Assange out of jail.
Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my
servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks
alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were
concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.
We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead.
Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a
WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The
only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had
a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from
them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.

SHINING A LIGHT
So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service,
under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embar-rassed those
who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:
• Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks “has violated the Espionage Act.”
• The New Yorker’s George Packer calls Assange “super-secretive,
thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal.”
• Sarah Palin claims he’s “an anti-American operative with blood on his
hands” whom we should pursue “with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and
Taliban leaders.”
• Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale’s 1984 campaign manager) said about
Assange on Fox: “A dead man can’t leak stuff… there’s only one way to do
it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch.”
• Republican Mary Matalin says “he’s a psychopath, a sociopath… He’s a
terrorist.”
• Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a “terrorist organization.”
And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who
have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won’t
be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it’s Big Brother
who’s being watched… by us!
WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this.
But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of
WikiLeaks (“they’ve released little that’s new!”) or have painted them as
simple anarchists (“WikiLeaks just releases everything without any
editorial control!”). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream
media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners
have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do
their job.
There’s no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put,
investors don’t want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept…
as secrets.

MAKING A DIFFERENCE
I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks
had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo:
. That’s Mr.
Bush about to be handed a “secret” document on August 6th, 2001. Its
heading read: “Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US.” And on those pages
it said the FBI had discovered “patterns of suspicious activity in this
country consistent with preparations for hijackings.” Mr. Bush decided to
ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.
But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted?
What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance
that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about
bin Laden’s impending attack using hijacked planes?
But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the
secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that
two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing.
Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called
the FBI?
Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read “secret” memos from
Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the “facts” he wanted in
order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that
time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you
think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn’t there
have been calls for Cheney’s arrest?
Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry
has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within
days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that
our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin --
there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole
thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million
Vietnamese) might be alive today.
Instead, secrets killed them.

THE ‘OFFICIAL STORY’
For those of you who think it’s wrong to support Julian Assange because of
the sexual assault allegations he’s being held for, all I ask is that you
not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after
its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the “official story.” And
regardless of Assange’s guilt or innocence, this man has the right to have
bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach
and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and
we’re glad the judge granted his release last week.
Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and
U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that’s the price you pay
when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your
punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights
in the room so that we can see what you’re up to. You simply can’t be
trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry,
but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No
one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.
And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless
them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who
join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism.
Period.
I stood in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I asked the judge to
grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with
the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice
to continue unchallenged.

Reprinted with permission from
www.michaelmoore.com





 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close