Letters

Letters 09-26-2016

Welcome To 1984 The Democrat Party, the government education complex, private corporations and foundations, the news media and the allpervasive sports and entertainment industry have incrementally repressed the foundational right of We the People to publicly debate open borders, forced immigration, sanctuary cities and the calamitous destruction of innate gender norms...

Grow Up, Kachadurian Apparently Tom Kachadurian has great words; too bad they make little sense. His Sept. 19 editorial highlights his prevalent beliefs that only Hillary and the Dems are engaged in namecalling and polarizing actions. Huh? What rock does he live under up on Old Mission...

Facts MatterThomas Kachadurian’s “In the Basket” opinion deliberately chooses to twist what Clinton said. He chooses to argue that her basket lumped all into the clearly despicable categories of the racist, sexist, homophobic , etc. segments of the alt right...

Turn Off Fox, Kachadurian I read Thomas Kachadurian’s opinion letter in last week’s issue. It seemed this opinion was the product of someone who offered nothing but what anyone could hear 24/7/365 on Fox News; a one-sided slime job that has been done better by Fox than this writer every day of the year...

Let’s Fix This Political Process Enough! We have been embroiled in the current election cycle for…well, over a year, or is it almost two? What is the benefit of this insanity? Exorbitant amounts of money are spent, candidates are under the microscope day and night, the media – now in action 24/7 – focuses on anything and everything anyone does, and then analyzes until the next event, and on it goes...

Can’t Cut Taxes 

We are in a different place today. The slogan, “Making America Great Again” begs the questions, “great for whom?” and “when was it great?” I have claimed my generation has lived in a bubble since WWII, which has offered a prosperity for a majority of the people. The bubble has burst over the last few decades. The jobs which provided a good living for people without a college degree are vanishing. Unions, which looked out for the welfare of employees, have been shrinking. Businesses have sought to produce goods where labor is not expensive...

Wrong About Clinton In response to Thomas Kachadurian’s column, I have to take issue with many of his points. First, his remarks about Ms. Clinton’s statement regarding Trump supporters was misleading. She was referring to a large segment of his supporters, not all. And the sad fact is that her statement was not a “smug notion.” Rather, it was the sad truth, as witnessed by the large turnout of new voters in the primaries and the ugly incidents at so many of his rallies...

Home · Articles · News · Features · Wind turbines
. . . .

Wind turbines

Anne Stanton - December 20th, 2010
WIND TURBINES: Draft of discontent in Manistee and Benzie
By Anne Stanton
Winds of controversy are sure to arrive at Benzie Central High School on
Tuesday, December 21, when residents are invited to attend a panel
discussion on the industrial wind turbines planned in southern Benzie and
northern Manistee counties.
There are definitely two sides to the proposed construction of 112 wind
turbines by Duke Energy’s Gail Windpower Project -- and potentially other
energy companies -- seeking to erect wind turbines.
Many farmers are jubilant about the potential income to their struggling
farms, while some environmentalists love the idea of alternative wind
energy in their back yard. Wind energy would not only provide jobs and
local tax revenues, it’s virtually carbon free and a step toward energy
independence from troublesome and sometimes violent countries. They
believe the turbines can work with sufficient regulation and setbacks from
their neighbors.
But others have joined the grassroots group, Citizens for Responsible Wind
Development, and have expressed fear the turbines will produce noise,
shadow flicker and vibration. There’s also concern that the gigantic
490-foot structures will reduce property values, block scenic views and
affect the future of building more homes in the rural townships. Bird
lovers fear the turbines will kill migrating birds and bats.
“As may be expected, landowners in a position to potentially receive
royalties from a wind farm think the towers are beautiful, and those who
aren’t, but would have to look at them anyhow are concerned about their
negative physical and visual impact on the area,” said Brad Hopwood,
planning commission chairman for Arcadia Township.

THE DEAL
So far, Duke Energy has gathered signed leases from about 100 property
owners living on 6,000 acres of land. The company, however, has not signed
nor filed the leases with the Register of Deeds. They will move forward on
the project only if they get a purchase power agreement from a utility
company. The company will divide a share of the revenues among the
property owners living within the 12,000-acre footprint. Owners who have
signed leases have been told they can expect to receive about $14,500 each
year.
Meanwhile, there is much to be done in terms of zoning among the four
townships in Benzie and Manistee counties.
Currently, Arcadia Township in Manistee has a height restriction for wind
turbines of 300 feet. Pleasanton Township officials (also Manistee County)
are working on an ordinance with a targeted finish date of June 2011, when
the company will have results from a wind metering tower they set up in
the township. The draft ordinance says that a wind energy company must
reimburse property owners for any loss of value.
Joyfield Township (Benzie County) has no ordinance at all, so a wind
energy company could conceivably do anything it wants. And Blaine Township
(Benzie County) recently approved a moratorium on permits until it can
write an ordinance. Doug Carter, an Arcadia Township golf course owner who
opposes the turbines, said he hopes that all four townships adopt a
uniform ordinance. Even so, he has profound doubts that wind energy makes
any financial or environmental sense.
“Why are we giving Duke Energy tremendous federal incentives to build wind
turbines to satisfy the needs of all the inefficient lifestyles, when it’s
your money and my money? Why not give me $200 if I can show I have saved X
amount of kilowatt hours with a front-loading washer or by adding
insulation? Give the subsidy money to people who will benefit, rather than
an energy company to make us feel good.”

COMMUNITY-CHANGING
Rochelle Rolenhagen, who is writing the ordinance for Pleasanton Township,
said her views on wind turbines have changed. She believes the company is
intentionally preying upon poor people in an area that couldn’t profitably
produce electricity for wind if it weren’t for a 30% federal subsidy.
“A year ago, I was so pro wind you have no idea. But this is a
community-changing event because it is superimposing on our rural
residential townships a total of 112 wind turbines. Think of that. They
are 495 feet, which I equate to a 50-story building. We haven’t even
talked about the massive amount of foundation that will be put in the
ground. Twenty feet in diameter above the ground, but under the ground
it’s a 60-foot diameter concrete slab that goes in the ground. When the
turbines come down, that slab will be in the ground forever.”
 There’s also the potential for blade throw (when a blade accidentally
detaches), blade glint, and ice throw (ice flinging from the blade), she
said.
“So we’ve got some major impacts we’re dealing with, and the more research
I do, the more health effects I see. It’s a very new industry. I think
these things need very, very far setbacks from property lines for health
and safety reasons. And that’s what zoning is all about. To protect the
health, safety and welfare of the citizenry.”
Meanwhile, an ad hoc committee from the Grand Traverse Regional Land
Conservancy has made a recommendation that wind turbines not be allowed on
the 3,800 acres known as the Arcadia Dunes. The conservancy also owns
conservation easements on 2,200 acres it bought from CMS Energy --
farmland that’s either been resold as farmland or will be resold in the
future. The conservancy will allow wind turbines on the farmland, said
Jennifer Jay, communications and outreach director.

WORK IN PROGRESS
Some people complain that they have yet to see a map of the wind turbine
footprint, but that’s because it’s a work in progress, said Greg
Efthimiou, Duke Energy’s spokesman in an email.
“There is no map of the project yet, because we are still piecing together
the footprint of the project. The project encompasses parts of Arcadia,
Pleasanton, Bear Lake, Joyfield and Blaine Townships. As a result, our
final footprint has not been finalized as we are still adding leases and
doing our upfront due diligence.”
He also emailed that they’ve begun work on the view-shed analysis, but the
target continues to shift slightly as the exact dimensions and
specifications of the wind project evolve.
“We know from firsthand experience that thoughtful upfront design work can
mitigate potential impacts on the view-shed. We’ve heard from a lot of
neighbors at our existing wind farms who were surprised over how graceful
the wind turbines actually are in appearance.”
Carter said that he’ll live with the township ordinance as long as it
protects the rights of all property owners and protects the environment.
“I will respect the decision of the township boards. I’ll just suck it up
and live with it. But I will make my opinion known before then.”

The upcoming forum is sponsored by the Benzie Soil and Water Conservation
District. It will start at 6:30 p.m., Tuesday, December 21, in the Benzie
Central High School auditorium. Peter Payette of WIAA will moderate the
panel.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close