Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · Donning our white apparel...
. . . .

Donning our white apparel

Stephen Tuttle - December 13th, 2010
Donning our gay apparel
Traverse City has become the latest Michigan city to approve an
ordinance that prohibits discrimination against people based on their
sexual orientation. And just like in many of those other cities, a
group opposed to the ordinance is attempting to put the matter before
This is a national phenomenon in which anti-discrimination measures,
typically passed after contentious debate, are then challenged at the
ballot. The measures are usually upheld by voters after additional
contention and campaign ugliness.
Apparently, there are those who believe it should be acceptable to
discriminate against some people. They have their reasons.
Some say those protected by such an ordinance, the gay, lesbian,
bisexual and transgender communities (GLBT), have “chosen their
lifestyle” and, therefore, are undeserving of anti-discrimination
Those who assume sexual orientation is nothing more than personal
choice should ask themselves why anyone would make a choice that
subjects them to intolerance, discrimination, sometimes violence and
does not provide them equal protection under the law, none of which
would be the case had they made a different choice.
In fact, there is no consensus on why anyone is gay, straight or
something in between. A growing body of researchers believe sexual
orientation is genetic, literally part of someone’s DNA at birth.
Others believe it is a combination of genetics and environment. No
one has yet discovered the absolutely definitive answer though the
research is starting to tilt strongly toward genetics.
There are others who oppose such anti-discrimination attempts because
they claim there is something called “the homosexual agenda” that will
destroy traditional marriage specifically, and society in general.
Unfortunately, those of us who are not gay, lesbian, bisexual or
transgender have done a splendid job of wrecking traditional marriages
without any outside assistance. According to the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, about half of all first marriages end in
divorce. The statistics get significantly worse for second and third
The long list of the causes of divorce does not include a GLBT
conspiracy successfully plotting the overthrow of Mom and Dad.
There is still another group that bases their opposition on the
teachings of the Bible. True enough, there are specific proscriptions
against male homosexuality in the Old Testament and especially in
Leviticus. The prohibition is first spelled out (chapter 18, verse
22) and then repeated with an attached penalty of death (verse 20,
chapter 13). But it also calls for death for adultery or cursing your
mother and father.
Leviticus is sort of a primer on how to live and behave that’s part
medical and dietary guide, part worship guide (lots and lots of
sacrificing of livestock is required, and we don’t see much of that
these days), part criminal justice system. It’s plenty strict and
plenty harsh. Wearing linen and wool at the same time, for example,
is “abominable.” And everyone should read chapter 15’s directions on
personal cleanliness. Women will be especially startled.
It is instructive that those who point to Leviticus to legitimize
discrimination cavalierly ignore and are oddly silent about the
chapter’s many, many instructions and other prohibitions.
Clearly, all of us are entitled to our religious beliefs. Various
sects, denominations, religions and belief systems are entitled to
theirs. None of us is entitled to force those beliefs on anybody
There are those who believe homosexuals, especially gay men, are
pedophiles. This is, of course, preposterous. Pedophilia, by
definition, is age-specific not gender-specific. To be sure there are
gay pedophiles but there is no one who is a pedophile because they are
And, finally, there are those opponents who believe these kinds of
state laws and local ordinances afford special rights to certain
people the rest of us do not enjoy. But laws and ordinances that
prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation protect all sexual
orientations, not just the GLBT communities.
But, you say, you’ve never heard of a straight person being
discriminated against because of their sexual orientation? Exactly.
What inevitably happens in these debates over anti-discrimination
efforts is opponents quickly run out of legitimate arguments,
especially for the most basic rights. Do we really think it’s all
right for someone to be denied a job or a place to live simply because
of their sexual orientation? Do we think it’s all right to summarily
fire someone for that reason?
There is absolutely no evidence to indicate that gay, lesbian,
bisexual or transgender people are any less caring, loving,
productive, protective, or patriotic members of society than anybody
We, like many other places, have a long history of discriminatory
behavior toward people and groups who either aren’t sufficiently
similar to the rest of us to blend in or who are powerless, or both.
We also have a history of eventually correcting those mistakes though
it almost always takes longer than it should and at least once
required a civil war.
It has taken us a long time to start the process by which we can now
end discrimination against another segment of society. Hopefully, the
voters of Traverse City, and any other Michigan community with a
similar issue headed for the ballot, will understand we have nothing
to lose and much to gain by supporting anti-discrimination laws and
This time of year, as we’re donning now our gay apparel, it would be
nice if we had some political peace on earth and goodwill toward
men... and women in the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5