Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Would you buy this...
. . . .

Would you buy this bridge

Robert Downes - November 1st, 2010
Would You Buy This Bridge?
Anyone interested in buying the Mackinac Bridge? It’s perfect for the
person who has everything, or that ‘hard to shop for’ person on your
Christmas list.
There was a flurry of manufactured outrage over an alleged plan to
sell the Mighty Mac last week to help patch the state’s $1.6 billion
budget hole. The idea seems about as likely to happen as selling 40
acres and a mule to homesteaders on the moon, but it’s worth passing
Then-candidate for governor Rick Snyder said his comments about
privatizing Michigan’s assets had been mangled by a columnist at the
Detroit News and he had no plans to sell the Mackinac Bridge if
elected. But opponent Virg Bernero seized on the gaff and held a “Save
the Bridge” rally in St. Ignace.
Outgoing U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak piled on, wondering what else Snyder
might consider privatizing, adding that selling old Macky would be
“totally unacceptable.”
“The Mackinac Bridge is a true symbol of Michigan, recognized
throughout the world. It belongs to the people of Michigan. To
attempt to sell the bridge to a private company would only lead to
increased tolls on residents and tourists,” Stupak said in a release.
“Given Mr. Snyder’s recent comments regarding the privatization of
essential public services, who knows what other important Michigan
resources Mr. Snyder would be willing to sell-off, perhaps our Great
Lakes water?”
The idea of selling the Mackinac Bridge isn’t completely crazy; there
is a precedent: In 1971, the 140-year-old London Bridge over the
Thames River was dismantled, packed on ships and carted off to Lake
Havasu, Arizona, where it stands today, inspiring legions of retirees
in pontoon boats. If something that odd could happen 40 years ago,
then anything is possible.
But it seems rather unlikely that we could sell the Mackinac Bridge
even if we were so inclined. The present toll of $3.50 per car barely
pays for repainting the five-mile bridge and replacing its decks each
year. Many of us trolls and yoopers would just stay home and refuse to
pay if a new owner decided to up the rates.
But let’s suppose you could find some oligarch in Russia with money to
burn, or we sold the bridge to China, Inc. For starters, these suckers
probably wouldn’t live long enough to see a return on their
Built 53 years ago, the Mackinac Bridge was financed with $100 million
in bonds, which took approximately 30 years to pay off. But we
wouldn’t ask for a mere $100 million this time around. Ten years ago,
it was estimated that it would cost $400 million to replace the
bridge, but that seems light in the loafers. And with sentimental
value added in and view property being what it is these days on Lake
Michigan -- come on -- we’d surely want at least $10 billion.
But then we’d run the risk of someone buying the
Stitcher-of-the-Straits for scrap metal. After all, it contains
94,500 tons of steel, which might be easily transported down the St.
Lawrence Seaway, to be used for building new cars in Japan.
But it would be tough to disassemble: David Steinman, the engineer who
built the Mackinac Bridge, claimed that it could stand up to winds of
365 miles per hour and would likely outlast the pyramids of Egypt.
So let’s forget the whole thing and consider some other privatization
schemes as Michigan edges into this bold new world of reinventing
itself. After all, we’re already selling our groundwater to Nestle,
Inc., and this trend seems likely to continue:
• We could sell one-minute ‘ownerships’ of the bridge to tourists at
$10 a pop with a certificate that’s suitable for framing, along with a
discount coupon for rubber tomahawks and toy muskets at Mackinaw City
souvenir shops.
• Sell our freeways to the sheiks of Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, who are
“good to the last drop” in their vested interest in keeping cars on
the road.
• Perhaps the Michigan Education Association would be interested in
buying the Michigan Lottery? Some claim that’s where the lottery’s
education bucks go anyway.
• The Chinese worked miracles creating the free trade city of
Shenzhen. It has become one of the wealthiest cities in Asia since its
humble beginnings in the 1970s. Maybe they’d take on a baker’s dozen
of depressed Michigan cities as fixer-uppers if the price were right:
Detroit, Flint, Battle Creek, Saginaw, Benton Harbor...
• We could also sell the State Legislature if it weren’t for
unsubstantiated claims that it’s already been bought and paid for.

Correction: Northern Express inadvertently ran a photograph in last
week‘s Bottoms Up column that was copyrighted by the Traverse City

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5