Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · Catching up with the...
. . . .

Catching up with the Republicans

Stephen Tuttle - May 23rd, 2011
Catching Up With the Republicans
It’s time for our Approximately Quarterly Almost Official Update on the
Republican presidential race. There have been some changes since last we
discussed the subject.
Let’s start with the dearly departed.
The not-quite-brave-enough who dabbled at the prospect of a run and then
ran away from it are Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, Indiana
Congressman Mike Pence, South Dakota Senator John Thune and, most
recently, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee. All demonstrated unusual
wisdom in dropping out.
Huckabee’s departure is especially significant given his appeal among
Republicans who describe themselves as evangelicals, a group that turns
out in big numbers for Republican presidential primaries. Those voters are
now up for grabs.
And, of course, Donald Trump has confirmed what many of us already knew;
he had no intention of running. His departure mostly benefits Republican
voters who will now be spared his self-aggrandizing blather.
On the opposite side of the ledger we have two official candidates,
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, who is taking his third stab at the
presidency, and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.
“Exploring” a run are former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, former
Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle
Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and Herman Cain, the
former CEO of Godfather’s Pizza and a talk radio host.
Not officially running or exploring but lurking around the fringes or
making lots of speeches in the early primary states are former Vice
Presidential candidate Sarah Palin, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, former
Utah Governor and Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman, New Jersey Governor
Chris Christie and Wisconsin Congressman and budget guru Paul Ryan.
Quite a group.
We can eliminate Cain, Bachmann, Santorum, Christie, Paul and Ryan. They
lack name recognition, have no natural constituency and will never raise
the funds needed to mount an effective campaign. Paul has a loyal but too
small group of supporters and will likely hang around as a matter of
principle. Expect him to do about as well as he did in his two previous
That leaves us with Romney, Gingrich, Pawlenty, Daniels and Huntsman.
Daniels, Huntsman and Pawlenty are an interesting trio.
Mitch Daniels was Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under George W. Bush and has been a popular governor of Indiana despite
struggling with the state’s budget issues. Jon Huntsman, a thoughtful
conservative, was governor of the bright red state of Utah until accepting
President Obama’s appointment as Ambassador to China. Former Minnesota
Governor Tim Pawlenty has solid New Right credentials and has become a bit
of a darling among the evangelical set. Any of the three would make a
legitimate opponent for President Obama but all lack name recognition, a
national organization and money.
Now we’re down to Romney and Gingrich.
Mitt Romney looks like he should be president. He’s been a successful
businessman and politician, has been campaigning for two solid years,
built a decent national organization, has the ability to raise money and
has consistently been at or near the top in early polling.
He’d be an attractive candidate in a General Election if he could somehow
get through the Republican primaries, but that’s the rub. His advocacy of
healthcare reform in Massachusetts that included mandatory insurance for
everyone reminds too many Republicans of Obamacare (there are stark
differences but his opponents won’t care) and, unfortunately, his Mormon
religion makes him untrustworthy in the eyes of many evangelicals. We
aren’t quite done with religious bigotry just yet.
Newt Gingrich will never be president. He is plenty smart and full of big
ideas but he’s prone to grandiose statements few can understand and is
already being accused of flip-flopping on more than one issue. His
reputation for big ideas is accompanied by a reputation for never bringing
any of those ideas to fruition.
Gingrich is trying desperately to capitalize on Mike Huckabee’s departure
from the race by courting religious fundamentalists. But he has a real
problem with the large bloc of Republican women voters who describe
themselves as religious or very religious – two unpleasant divorces and
tales of multiple affairs.
The former Speaker has also discovered an ugly truth about the 2012
Republican presidential politics – there is a litmus test for everything.
Vary even slightly from acceptable dogma and risk being called a traitor
to all that is righteous. Gingrich made the mistake of tepidly criticizing
Paul Ryan’s draconian approach to Medicare and was immediately excoriated
by several darlings of the New Right. Newt had a different idea but the
GOP believes they don’t need any new ideas since the Ryan plan was
apparently etched in granite and brought down from on high.
I know. I’ve left out Sarah Palin. There is little reason for her to run.
Her weaknesses as a candidate far outweigh her strengths and her negative
poll numbers are daunting. A recent Quinnipiac University poll of
registered voters who have formed an opinion of the candidates found that
a staggering 58% of respondents said they “would never vote for” Palin.
That’s not such a good start. Her infatuation with celebrity, at least so
far, appears to outweigh her desire to jump into the rigors of a national
campaign. Why become a target when you can tweet potshots from the safety
of the sidelines?
We’re now just 18 months from the 2012 elections. The Republican field is
still a muddle of posturing and positioning. The endless trips to New
Hampshire, Iowa and South Carolina are well underway. The petty sniping
has begun.
Whoever emerges as the Republican nominee, and it may well be someone not
currently on the above or any other list, faces a formidable challenge.
Awaiting is a well-organized, effective campaigner who is also the best
fundraiser in American political history – Barack Obama. His re-election
team is talking about raising $1 billion. That’s $1,000,000,000. He will
exploit every advantage of his incumbency and if the economy improves
enough to restore just a glimmer of confidence in the country he will be
extraordinarily difficult to beat.
We’ll check back in a few months to see how much Republican blood has been
spilled and which candidates, if any, are still standing.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5