Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Unions under the gun
. . . .

Unions under the gun

Robert Downes - April 18th, 2011
I‘ve been a member of four unions during my life, but didn‘t always
appreciate what it meant to be part of the brotherhood of labor.
For instance, as a newly-minted member of the UAW many years ago, I
scoffed at the idea of receiving health insurance as a union benefit.
Why would I ever need such a thing? I wondered.
I was 19 at the time and health insurance was a rare and novel thing,
entirely unknown among my peers. If you weren’t a union member or a
government employee, chances are you didn’t have it.
Today, of course, we know that a lack of health insurance can be a ticket
to bankruptcy and chronic illness, perhaps even the grave.
Yet as a naive college student working in a factory in the Detroit area, I
didn’t have the sense to appreciate that wiser heads in the UAW were
looking out for my best interests.
During my late teens and 20s I belonged to the UAW, AFL-CIO, the
Teamsters, and the Detroit Newspaper Guild. Joining the union was an offer
you couldn’t refuse if you wanted a job in the Detroit area in the ‘70s.
It was the price of admission for us factory rats, and personally, I had
no complaints because a union shop meant the pay, benefits and safety
standards were better than the alternative.
Better, say, than those perilous non-union stamping plants where you could
stand at a hammering machine all day in a state of exhaustion, risking
the loss of a finger or a hand for little more than the minimum wage.
Many felt then and now that it wasn’t right to require employees to join a
union to obtain a job. But consider, if you weren’t required to join the
union at the factories I worked at, then there would have been an endless
stream of clueless 19-year-olds to fill the boots of injured, aging or
aggrieved workers deprived of collective bargaining. Workers who could be
used up and spat out without any consequences.
The American labor movement is proud of what it did to establish the
middle class in our country. In 1938, union leaders working with the
administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt established the Fair Labor
Standards Act which led to the 40-hour work week, time-and-a-half for
overtime and the abolition of child labor. The act also bumped up the
minimum wage to 40 cents per hour -- enough to make a decent living above
and beyond the “subsistence” wage preferred by employers at the time.
Prior to changes demanded by union activists, many Americans worked 10
hours a day, six days a week. Other union achievements included safer
working conditions and benefits such as paid vacations, health insurance,
paid sick days and holidays. Home ownership became a possibility for many
Americans as a result of bloody strikes that ended servitude to “the
company store” and the wage slavery described in Upton Sinclair’s book,
“The Jungle,” in which workers were paid just above the level of
starvation as a popular business philosophy.
Yet by the time Bob Dylan wrote “Union Sundown” in 1984 (“Sure was a good
idea, ‘til greed got in the way.”) the esteem of unions had begun a long
slide in the eyes of many Americans. Added to this was decades of
union-bashing by well-funded conservative think tanks that fed into the
mainstream media. As Dylan wrote as far back as the early ‘80s, union
jobs were being outsourced to Argentina and Brazil, filled by “a guy
making 30 cents a day.”
Today, the labor movement is at war with the Republican Party, with the
battlegrounds being the state capitals of Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio and
Michigan. At issue is whether these and other casualties in the Rust Belt
will become “right-to-work” states, meaning employees will no longer be
required to join unions or pay dues.
In Michigan, public employee unions fear they‘ll lose hard-won contracts
and the right to collective bargaining under the state‘s new emergency
financial managers.
Also, seven Republican state senators have co-sponsored a bill to
establish “right-to-work zones” in our counties and municipalities. This
could be the hole in the dike that leads to Michigan becoming a
right-to-work state in general.
Gov. Snyder has said that he wouldn’t push for right-to-work legislation,
but would sign it if it came from the Republican-controlled House and
Senate.
Shades of Wisconsin.
There are currently 22 right-to-work states in the U.S., most of them in
the South and the center of the country. The Mackinac Center -- a
conservative think tank -- notes that “eight of the 11 states with the
lowest unemployment rates in the country were right-to-work states” in
2010. There’s also the claim that Michigan’s unemployment rate is 50%
higher than the average right-to-work state.
This makes for good union bashing, but faulty logic. Is it the fault of
Michigan union members that the Big 3 automakers made terrible choices in
the cars they chose to produce while Toyota, Hyundai and Honda made off
with their market?
And should union workers be blamed for the disaster unleashed by Wall
Street, which wrecked our economy along with the tax base that supports
our state budget?
Some hope that the union protests in Madison, Lansing and other state
capitals will result in a populist uprising of support of labor, save the
middle class and stick it to the GOP in the next election...
...but that is forgetting that this is the country that bounced the
Democrats out of office for the high crime & treason of enacting a very
modest reform of our health care system. If Americans don‘t care about
the collective health of their fellow citizens (not to mention their own
self-interest), why should they care about labor?
Given that, it should be interesting to see which way the wind blows
leading up to the 2012 election.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close