Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Other Opinions · The Fifth of July
. . . .

The Fifth of July

Stephen Tuttle - July 4th, 2011
The Fifth of July
We have arrived at that uniquely American celebration, Independence Day.
We hope for good weather and fireworks, sparklers, hot dogs and family picnics. We revel in the day, celebrating 235 years of freedom from the dastardly King George and his British minions and the succession of other miscreants and despots we’ve vanquished since.
Another tradition this time of year is an e-mail that gets widely circulated. The basic premise is that none of the freedoms we enjoy would be possible without the men and women who serve and served in our armed forces.
Those now serving in Iraq and Afghanistan continue the long tradition of Americans fighting on foreign soil in the name of ideals established back home. They are paying a staggering price. More than 6,000 have died, and nearly 36,000 have sustained wounds or injuries sufficient to require hospitalization. Many of those are catastrophic injuries, including brain trauma requiring months or years of rehabilitation.
Depending on whose numbers you trust, another 200,000 to 300,000 are suffering the very real and disabling effects of post traumatic stress disorder.
To their credit, President Obama and Congress have increased funding for the Veterans’ Administration specifically to try and deal with the medical and rehabilitation needs of our returning vets. Unfortunately, it isn’t enough. Nor have we even begun to address other issues afflicting returning vets.
It is an ongoing puzzlement and shame that our veterans, especially those returning from the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters, who did so well on our behalf on foreign soil are doing so poorly once they return home.
They have significantly higher divorce rates than non-vets in the same demographic groups and returning women vets are three times more likely to get divorced than their male counterparts. They have higher rates of drug abuse and addiction, including alcoholism, than the general public. They are more likely to encounter the criminal justice system and not in a good way.
Most tragically, according to the Veterans’ Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the suicide rate among returning vets in the 18-29 age group has reached a stunning 44.7 per 100,000, nearly four times the national average.
Despite the commercials showing bright young men and women learning valuable skills and obtaining a practical education to help them in the civilian work force, chronic unemployment might be the most daunting reality facing returning vets. It turns out risking life and limb in a combat zone does not provide the skill set necessary for gainful employment in today’s economy.
According to the Department of Labor, unemployment among vets returning from Iraq and Afghanistan is 14.7% compared to about 9% for the rest of us. For young vets, 18-24, it’s even worse, a stultifying 21.1%.
It is a lot of sacrificing being done by a small segment of our population. They deserve far better on their return home.
While we celebrate our independence, and brave men and women try to protect that independence by putting their lives at risk thousands of miles from home, our politicians here have embarked on a different path.
Congress recently extended the Patriot Act. So while we claim we’re bringing freedom to the poor, bedraggled Iraqis and Afghanis, we continue to see our own freedoms eroded.
The Patriot Act and its satellite legislation give us warrantless wire taps, traps on our cell phone and internet activity, suspension of habeas corpus, military tribunals in which normal protections we take for granted have been summarily suspended or eliminated altogether (some defendants will not even be allowed access to the evidence being used against them), detention without the right or ability to contact a lawyer or family member, and torture we euphemistically call enhanced interrogation techniques. It gives us airport security excesses that include pat-downs of three-year-olds and searches of a 95-year-old woman’s adult diaper.
We’re told it’s all essential in our war against terror, that some people don’t deserve rights even if they’ve never been convicted of anything, that these intrusions into the Bill of Rights protects us from the terrorists, that torturing prisoners is somehow acceptable if we’ve sufficiently demonized them and some useful information might be obtained in the process. And, hey, you just never know when someone’s great-great grandmother might have explosives tucked away in her Depends or when someone’s infant might have anthrax in her pacifier.
The problem is those laws being used against our worst enemies can also be used against our best citizens.
These assaults on the Bill of Rights simply are not, and cannot be, any part of what our military is defending. It would be a cruel betrayal of the sacrifices they make. Yet, the politicians continue to send them off on missions defending freedom while chipping away at ours here at home.
The Fourth of July is a time we celebrate our history and we still have much to celebrate. Once the picnics are over and the fireworks a pleasant memory perhaps we should spend a minute or two thinking about the 5th of July and beyond.
We can hope for a future Fourth of July when our politicians finally start taking care of those they’ve sent to war in the name of protecting us. And we elect politicians serious about preserving our freedoms here at home.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5