Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Features · Up in Smoke Court ruling puts...
. . . .

Up in Smoke Court ruling puts pot purveyors out of business

Patrick Sullivan - August 29th, 2011
Up in Smoke: Court ruling puts pot purveyors out of business
By Patrick Sullivan
Owners of medical marijuana collectives decided not to wait for the police to knock on their doors following last week’s court decision that, for now, puts an end to legal patient-to-patient sales of pot.
“We’re just telling (our customers) that due to the recent government ruling, we’ve been advised by our attorney not to be transferring medicine period,” said Steve Ezell, an employee at the Collective, a marijuana shop on State Street in TC.
Pot shops across the state are in jeopardy after the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Aug. 24 in favor of prosecutors in an Isabella County case and said the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act does not legalize the sale of marijuana for profit.
TC Police said they would look into the business practices at marijuana shops, but before they could, shops across town apparently closed.
That put around a dozen employees at the Collective out of work and left around 1,500 members who have a doctor’s prescription to use marijuana without a source for the drug.
The court ruling determined that the businesses are public nuisances and violate the state public health code, which is meant to protect citizens from hazards.
Ezell said he didn’t think the business he worked at ever posed a threat to the public. It opened last November.
“You’ll have to check with the Traverse City police, but I’m confident that there’s been zero incidents involving the Collective,” Ezell said.

Jesse Williams, a TC attorney who represents collectives, said he’s advising his clients it’s too risky to stay in business.
“The Court of Appeals made it clear that patient-to-patient transfer for compensation is not what was intended” in the Medical Marijuana Act, Williams said.
Williams believes a footnote in the decision leaves open the possibility that non-profits could open in the place of the businesses that just closed, but he believes eventually prosecutors and the courts might seek to close those also.
“It’s going to create a whole whirlwind of non-profits popping up now,” Williams said.
He said he thought the medical marijuana act was intended to make it possible for patients to get access to marijuana, and that’s what the collectives did. Now, some patients who don’t grow it themselves will be forced to go without marijuana or deal on the black market.
“It’s back to a free-for-all and to me that doesn’t make sense,” Williams said. “I don’t know why we are spending so much time and energy fighting something when the same amount of consumption is going to happen regardless.”

The decision, which took immediate effect, was praised by state Attorney General Bill Schuette.
“This ruling is a huge victory for public safety and Michigan communities struggling with an invasion of pot shops near their schools, homes and churches,” Schuette said in a press release. “Today the Court echoed the concerns of law enforcement, clarifying that this law is narrowly focused to help the seriously ill, not the creation of a marijuana free-for-all.”
Schuette said he would send a letter to each county prosecutor to explain how the decision empowers them to close medical marijuana shops.
The decision was signed by judges Joel P. Hoekstra, Christopher M. Murray, and Cynthia Diane Stephens.
“It’s a helpful opinion in that it gives people some guidance. Not everyone’s going to agree with it,” said Joseph Hubbell, prosecutor for Leelanau County, which until this week had one dispensary, the M-22 Collective in Elmwood Township.
M-22 had a sign posted Thursday saying they were closed.
Hubbell said he hasn’t decided whether to take action based on the ruling. He said he will have to see how the businesses respond to the new reality.
While there was only one marijuana business operating in Leelanau County, numerous townships were grappling with how to regulate proposed marijuana shops.

The business in Mt. Pleasant called Compassionate Apothecary (CA), whose case led to the decision, went to great lengths to avoid actually being in the business of buying and selling marijuana, according to the court decision.
Despite the measures, Isabella County prosecutors sought to prove CA operated outside of the bounds of the Medical Marijuana Act, and the court of appeals agreed.
CA’s goal was to provide an uninterrupted supply of marijuana to their patients by facilitating “patient-to-patient transfers,” according to the decision.
It made money by bringing together patients and caregivers who could then sell marijuana to each other.
They had around 345 members who paid $5 per month. The business also controlled 27 lockers it rented for $50 per month.
A patient could store 2.5 ounces of marijuana in their locker and if they had excess marijuana they could sell it to other patients. Caregivers could store up to 2.5 ounces for each of their patients.
A patient would show their Michigan Department of Community Healt-issued medical marijuana card and they would be taken to a display room where they could look at, touch and smell different strains of marijuana.
A patient could purchase up to two and a half ounces every two weeks. Owners set the price and CA collected 20 percent.
The business opened in May of 2010 and in the first two and a half months it sold 19 pounds of marijuana. Marijuana owners made around $79,000 and CA made around $21,000 in that time, according to the decision. CA also had outlets in Traverse City and Lansing.
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5