Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Another job terminator
. . . .

Another job terminator

Robert Downes - February 28th, 2011
Another Job Terminator
Did anyone feel a chill run down their spine last week when the IBM computer Watson obliterated “Jeopardy” champs Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter in a stunt that has profound ramifications for the human race?
No, not some kind of SkyNet “rise of the machines” fantasy with Terminators running amok. The potential damage of Watson and his ilk is to eliminate millions of jobs in the name of “progress” and “productivity.”
Some background: several years ago, IBM set out to create a computer that could process all of the foibles of human speech: our slang, double-entendres, jokes, you name it, with the test being how well this critter would do on “Jeopardy.” They created a “question answering machine” composed of 400 mainframe computers containing 3,000 computer cores and 15 trillion bytes of memory.
Watson digested the equivalent of 10 million books prior to taking on Ken Jennings (a 74-game champion) and the undefeated champ Brad Rutter. By the second night of the match-up, the computer easily devastated his human competition, who seldom had a chance to even answer a question.
Watching the show, it was easy to see that Jennings and Rutter knew the answer to many of the questions, but never came close to beating Watson to the buzzer. This is because the computer was able to read the questions and provide a weighted answer within 10 milliseconds -- well before Jennings and Rutter could even read the first word or two of the questions.
Any guesses as to what IBM might do with this dandy new creation?
Well, for starters, how about replacing every medical transcriptionist in the world? Court recorders? Who needs them when the day comes that Watson is listening? And those tens of thousands of customer service reps now making a good living at call centers in far-off India? Gone.
Just about any job you can imagine that involves human speech has the potential to be replaced by the Watsons in our future, including of course, newspaper reporters, who rely on a simple “who, what, where, when and why” hierarchy to do their work. Watson’s children will surely be able to make phone calls and ask questions -- I hope to have Watson write this column soon, since it really is kind of pain in the ass at times, don’t you know.
It’s another example of how we’ve grown far too smart for our own good, steadily destroying millions of jobs with digital applications, automation and industrial robots.
Check out this issue’s article on the collapse of Borders Books for a related story. The digital replacement of books offers great news for the CEO at the top of amazon.com, but millions of jobs lost in book stores, publishing, logging, paper recycling, trucking, printing, binding and many other industries. You may be next.

A Tunnel Too Far...

It’s funny how the promise of money from a new hotel can so easily grease the wheels of progress while more worthy projects go begging.
For years cyclists and pedestrians have complained about the dangerous intersection at Division and the Grand Traverse Parkway in Traverse City. Angry confrontations between cyclists, roller bladers, pedestrians and motorists are common at this intersection, which handles between 26,000-33,000 vehicles per day.
You want to see moms with baby joggers scrambling for their lives? Red-faced cyclists and motorists screaming at each other over near-misses? It’s a nightly occurrence at that corner every summer, but city officials claim to be unaware of the situation. Perhaps they should try strolling across that intersection at rush hour in July, when scores of people are headed out for their evening exercise.
This is such an ongoing, urgent hazard that I suggested in jest a year ago that the city allow members of TART to pitch in with shovels and dig a tunnel under the highway.
Lo and behold, TC now has a pedestrian tunnel in the works, but it’s a half mile to the east to accommodate a new hotel and will do little to safeguard lives where it’s really needed.
Last week, the city commission approved plans to spend $1 million on a tunnel in the Warehouse District to connect the new Hotel Indigo project to the Open Space across the Parkway (Mayor Chris Bzdok cast the sole vote against it). This, although there is a relatively safe crosswalk at Union Street about 100 yards away. The idea is to nurture more business around the new hotel.
It’s good to see we have our priorities straight here in Traverse City.
And it’s nice to know that we have a new tunnel in the works for public safety, but it’s in the wrong place.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5