Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Features · Caring women pool their...
. . . .

Caring women pool their resources

Kristi Kurjan - March 19th, 2012  

When someone donates to a charitable organization, that money is appreciated and put to work.

Now, imagine what would happen if that money was double, tripled, quadrupled.

Or multiplied by 100. That’s the rationale behind “100 Women Who Care,” a group of women who meet four times a year, and in less than an hour raise over $10,000 for a local cause.


Kristin Marinoff of Traverse City and her mother, Renie Cutlet, co-founded the Traverse City/Leelanau County Chapter of 100 Women Who Care in December 2011.

The duo initially heard about the national organization through friends in their hometown of Grand Haven, who had launched their own chapter and encouraged the duo to bring the concept to the Grand Traverse area. After talking about the idea for over a year, they held the first meeting of the Traverse City/Leelanau County Chapter of 100 Women Who Care on December 1, 2011.

“As a busy working mother I struggle to find time to give back to my community,” said Marinoff. “The model of 100 Women Who Care is such a no-brainer: bringing women together to join forces, without a huge time commitment, to make a large impact on nonprofits in our community.”

The first step was to create a membership committee of ten women in different circles in the Grand Traverse and Leelanau County communities. Those ten women each invited ten women, creating a group of over 100 members for the first meeting.

“It didn’t take very long for me to know that we would easily have 100 women,” said Marinoff. “The first meeting was above and beyond my wildest expectations. We were so thrilled with the response and turn out.”

The organization does not limit its members.

In fact, the group had 160 women attend its first meeting and expects over 200 women at subsequent gatherings.


The group meets for one hour, four times per year. Members come to the meeting prepared to write a $100 donation to the chosen charity. Each woman in attendance is invited to write her name and an organization on a piece of paper that is then put into a hat. Three names are randomly chosen out of the hat to present their charity to the group. Each individual drawn has five minutes to present to the group why they think their charity deserves the 100 Women Who Care’s support.

After the presentations, each woman votes by secret ballot to decide which organization will receive the donations. By majority vote, the charity with the most votes “wins” for the night and each member immediately writes a check for $100 directly to that organization. Members who commit to 100 Women Who Care but cannot attend the meeting are still required to donate to the chosen charity.

One of the appeals of the 100 Women Who Care is that the money donated is guaranteed to stay local. The group considers charities that serve Grand Traverse and Leelanau Counties. Many women who decided to join 100 Women Who Care want to be part of something that has a large impact.

“I hear from many women that they just don’t feel that their $50 donation here or $100 donation there really makes a difference,” explained Marinoff. “By combining $100 donations from this many women, you really feel like you are a part of something big and something that could make big difference!”


The three charities presented by members 100 Women Who Care’s first meeting were the Father Fred Foundation, Single MOMM and The Leelanau Outdoor Center. After the ballots were counted, results were extremely close. In the end, Leelanau Outdoor Center, presented by Wendy DesAutels, won by two votes.

The camp initially received $16,000 in donations from the group. However, with local employer matching grants and more women deciding to join after they heard about the first meeting, the total donation ended up being $17,600. They will use the money to help with scholarship assistance for local school kids to be able to come to camp when they otherwise would not be able to.


Marinoff expects that 100 Women Who Care will continue to grow and make an impact on the different needs in our community.

“We all get approached by organizations to make donations here and there and many people have organizations they are very passionate about and have supported for years,” explains Marinoff.

“Even though only one organization wins the money at the end of the evening, the other two are winners too, simply because now they’ve made contact with nearly 200 women who they might not have had the chance to reach before.”

The second meeting of 100 Women Who Care was to be held on March 15 with following meetings scheduled for June 28 and September 27.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5