Letters

Letters 08-24-2015

Bush And Blame Jeb Bush strikes again. Understand that Bush III represents the nearly extinct, compassionate-conservative, moderate wing of the Republican party...

No More State Theatre I was quite surprised and disgusted by an article I saw in last week’s edition. On pages 18 and 19 was an article about how the State Theatre downtown let some homosexual couple get married there...

GMOs Unsustainable Steve Tuttle’s column on GMOs was both uninformed and off the mark. Genetic engineering will not feed the world like Tuttle claims. However, GMOs do have the potential to starve us because they are unsustainable...

A Pin Drop Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 to a group of Democrats in Charlevoix, an all-white, seemingly middle class, well-educated audience, half of whom were female...

A Slippery Slope Most of us would agree that an appropriate suggestion to a physician who refuses to provide a blood transfusion to a dying patient because of the doctor’s religious views would be, “Please doctor, change your profession as a less selfish means of protecting your religious freedom.”

Stabilize Our Climate Climate scientists have been saying that in order to stabilize the climate, we need to limit global warming to less than two degrees. Renewables other than hydropower provide less than 3 percent of the world energy. In order to achieve the two degree scenario, the world needs to generate 11 times more wind power by 2050, and 36 times more solar power. It will require a big helping of new nuclear power, too...

Harm From GMOs I usually agree with the well-reasoned opinions expressed in Stephen Tuttle’s columns but I must challenge his assertions concerning GMO foods. As many proponents of GMOs do, Mr. Tuttle conveniently ignores the basic fact that GMO corn, soybeans and other crops have been engineered to withstand massive quantities of herbicides. This strategy is designed to maximize profits for chemical companies, such as Monsanto. The use of copious quantities of herbicides, including glyphosates, is losing its effectiveness and the producers of these poisons are promoting the use of increasingly dangerous substances to achieve the same results...

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters 02-11-2013
. . . .

Letters 02-11-2013

- February 11th, 2013  
letters

Email your letter to: info@northernexpress.com

Please keep your letter under 300 words (one page). Only one letter per reader in a two month period will be accepted. may be edited for length or to correct factual errors. Letters must be signed to be considered for print and a phone number is required for verification.

Catholic priorities

Reading in the Feb. 3rd Detroit Free Press of retired Catholic Cardinal Roger Mahony’s efforts to “shield priests from prosecution and keep parishioners in the dark about sex crimes against minors” leads me to fervently wish that the Catholic Church would demonstrate the same level of care and attention for post-natals that it does for pre-natals.

Bob Ross • Pellston

Wants to drive 55

Does anyone remember why a national 55 MPH speed limit was imposed by a law signed by President Nixon back in early 1974? This speed limit was in response to 1973’s oil price increases on oil shortages. Limiting vehicular speed was intended to reduce consumption of oil. Some thought increased safety would be a secondary benefit of reduced vehicular speed, but mandatory seat belt laws are a better example of laws designed to increase safety. The 55 MPH speed limit had minimal compliance by drivers, so the best estimates were that it reduced fuel consumption by half what was expected.

Scientists are as unanimous as they ever get about the negative effect our burning fossil fuels is having on our climate. Above a vehicle’s most efficient speed (for most vehicles somewhere between 35 and 55 MPH, depending on vehicle, weather, terrain, and traffic), increasing speed reduces efficiency. Why would we insist on burning more fossil fuel by raising our speed limits?

The oil needed to fuel our cars is increasingly more difficult to extract from our planet, resulting in more and more environmental damage (pipeline failures, Deepwater Horizon, our coming disasters in the Arctic, nuclear disaster-like effect of extracting oil from “tar sands”). Wouldn’t it be smarter if we looked for ways to reduce our fuel consumption instead?

Daniel Robbins • Mackinaw City

Pay attention, voters

As if the lame duck actions of the Michigan legislature weren’t enough, the GOP is now working on a new law to change the way our electoral votes are counted. State Rep. Peter Lund, R-Shelby Township, is sponsoring the bill that would tie our votes to the congressional districts instead of the number of electoral votes assigned to each state based on population. Jack Lessenberry wrote a detailed column in the Jan. 27, 2013 Traverse City Record-Eagle that explains the issues clearly. Although the electoral college method may seem antiquated and complex, this is not the way to improve it.

I urge you to write Governor Snyder and your legislators and voice your opposition to this legislation.

Marilyn Cobb • Kewadin

Assaults weapons unnecessary

Do people really think they need assault weapons that fire 100 bullets without reloading to protect themselves? Do we really think that the federal government will confiscate our guns? If that is our fear, it seems to be a bit unrealistic when the federal government has drones and other sophisticated weapons which could be used far more effectively than gun power. Where does this intense fear come from? And how many individuals must be sacrificed to salve this fear? Certainly, other methods of lessening violence are needed, but if banning assault weapons and large magazine clips saves one child’s life, I’m in favor.

Our Michigan senator, Howard Walker states: “I will oppose any efforts at the state level to implement an assault weapons ban.” He may get an A from the NRA, but he gets an F from those of us concerned about the level of violence in our state and nation.

Lou Ann McKimmy • Rapid City

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close