Letters

Letters 08-31-2015

Inalienable Rights This is a response to the “No More State Theatre” in your August 24th edition. I think I will not be the only response to this pathetic and narrow-minded letter that seems rather out of place in the northern Michigan that I know. To think we will not be getting your 25 cents for the movie you refused to see, but more importantly we will be without your “two cents” on your thoughts of a marriage at the State Theatre...

Enthusiastically Democratic Since I was one of the approximately 160 people present at when Senator Debbie Stabenow spoke on August 14 in Charlevoix, I was surprised to read in a letter to Northern Express that there was a “rather muted” response to Debbie’s announcement that she has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president...

Not Hurting I surely think the State Theatre will survive not having the homophobic presence of Colleen Smith and her family attend any matinees. I think “Ms.” Smith might also want to make sure that any medical personnel, bank staff, grocery store staff, waiters and/or waitress, etc. are not homosexual before accepting any service or product from them...

Stay Home I did not know whether to laugh or cry when I read the letter of the extremely homophobic, “disgusted” writer. She now refuses to patronize the State Theatre because she evidently feels that its confines have been poisoned by the gay wedding ceremony held there...

Keep Away In response to Colleen Smith of Cadillac who refused to bring her family to the State Theatre because there was a gay wedding there: Keep your 25 cents and your family out of Traverse City...

Celebrating Moore And A Theatre I was 10 years old when I had the privilege to see my first film at the State Theatre. I will never forget that experience. The screen was almost the size of my bedroom I shared with my older sister. The bursting sounds made me believe I was part of the film...

Outdated Thinking This letter is in response to Colleen Smith. She made public her choice to no longer go to the State Theater due to the fact that “some homosexuals” got married there. I’m not outraged by her choice; we don’t need any more hateful, self-righteous bigots in our town. She can keep her 25 cents...

Mackinac Pipeline Must Be Shut Down Crude oil flowing through Enbridge’s 60-yearold pipeline beneath the Mackinac Straits and the largest collection of fresh water on the planet should be a serious concern for every resident of the USA and Canada. Enbridge has a very “accident” prone track record...

Your Rights To Colleen, who wrote about the State Theatre: Let me thank you for sharing your views; I think most of us are well in support of the first amendment, because as you know- it gives everyone the opportunity to express their opinions. I also wanted to thank Northern Express for not shutting down these types of letters right at the source but rather giving the community a platform for education...

No Role Model [Fascinating Person from last week’s issue] Jada quoted: “I want to be a role model for girls who are interested in being in the outdoors.” I enjoy being in the outdoors, but I don’t want to kill animals for trophy...

Home · Articles · News · Random Thoughts · Free Martha Stewart
. . . .

Free Martha Stewart

George Foster - July 4th, 2002
Lord have mercy, what a woman. I am in love with Martha Stewart.
None of the divas that most guys gush over can hold a candle to her. Pamela Anderson may strut around in the underbelly of the rock music scene but wouldn‘t know what to say to a corporate CEO. Cameron Dias obviously cannot cook a lick because she is just skin and bones. Britney Spears is just a girl - way, way too young. Martha Stewart, on the other hand, is ALL woman.
The feeding frenzy that has erupted in the media recently over possible charges against Stewart by federal authorities for violations of insider trading laws seems silly. Since the accusations began flying, though, I must admit I have changed my opinion of her - I am endeared to my Martha more than ever.
Why, you ask? Martha Stewart has stolen my heart because she is a bitch - at least that‘s the label many have given her. Unfortunately, becoming a self-made, successful woman in the male-dominated sectors of America is often synonymous with being called a bitch.
Jackie Kennedy was considered the ideal first lady because stood in the background gazing at the president adoringly, while somehow finding time to give tours of the White House for distinguished guests. Hillary Clinton was thought to be a bitch because she was an accomplished attorney, wrote best-seller books, had strong opinions of her own and possessed enough political savvy to eventually win a seat in the U.S. Senate.
In the past, women could usually escape the B-word label if they were accomplished in the kitchen in particular and on the domestic front in general. Martha Stewart drives us crazy, though, because she is just as comfortable giving millions of TV viewers her tips on baking chocolate chip cookies as she is negotiating in the corporate board rooms of her billion dollar enterprise. Martha Stewart may be more dangerous than Nat Turner. What if she leads a rebellion of other women off the plantation?
Give me a bitch anytime. There is nothing sexier than a strong, independent woman. Martha Stewart stands toe to toe with her detractors, mano y mujer, and continues to thrive. As with most successful businesswomen, she has had to be twice as smart, three times as ambitious, and ten times more hard working than her male counterparts - and she is.
Do you think Stewart‘s alleged stock-trading improprieties would have gotten the same attention if Martha had been born Mark? Even if the accused was a rich celebrity like Donald Trump or Michael Jordan - no way would the public care about such dealings among men. Investors benefit from insider trading every day but we rarely hear about it.
Yet, Stewart is now under intense media scrutiny similar to murder cases involving the Smart family and Robert Blake because she may have netted $43,000 on an investment transaction that involved a tip from a friend in the business. Come on, this is a pittance compared to the millions earned by high rollers on Wall Street in shady transactions.
I guarantee you, even if charges are brought against her for these infractions, she will be ruled innocent. However, Martha Stewart is guilty of an offense that will be difficult for many American men to ever accept: the crime of being a highly successful and independent woman.








 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close