Letters

Letters 09-01-2014

Hamas Shares Some Blame

Even when I disagree with Mr. Tuttle, I always credit him with a degree of fairness. Unfortunately, in his piece regarding the Palestinian/Israeli conflict he falls well short of offering any insights that might advance his readers’ understanding of the conflict...

The True Northport

I was disappointed by your piece on Northport. While I agree that the sewer system had a big impact on the village, I don’t agree with your “power of retirees” position. I see that I am thrown in with the group of new businesses started by “well-off retirees” and I feel that I have been thoroughly misrepresented, as has the village...

Conservatives and Obamacare

What is it about Obamacare that sends conservatives over the edge? There are some obvious answers...

Republican Times

I read the letter from Don Turner of Beulah and it seems he lives in that magical part of the Fox News Universe where no matter how many offices the Republican Party controls they are not responsible for anything bad that happens...

Home · Articles · News · Letters · Letters 6/6/02
. . . .

Letters 6/6/02

Various - June 6th, 2002
Sprawl and the bridge

Once in a generation -- once every 20 years or so -- we each have an
opportunity to make a statement about our community and the future of our
region. That moment is now.
Last month the Michigan Land Use Institute and a coalition of four other
regional and national environmental and conservation organizations filed
suit in state court against the Grand Traverse County Road Commission. The
purpose: To block construction of a $30 million road and bridge across the
Boardman River valley -- a magnificent stretch of natural river and quiet
forests just south of Traverse City.
I have been a resident of Traverse City for over 50 years now, so this area
has been very deeply imprinted on my husband and me. We have been imprinted
by the wondrous natural beauty of this north country. The Boardman River
valley is the last truly wild area in the gre ater metropolitan region. Each
year that passes increases the area‘s value for the animals that live there
and the thousands of people who visit its rolling hills, its woods, and its
waters. Those moving depths, which an Indian chief once called, “the smile
of the Great Spirit.“
I‘ve also been around long enough to see the welcome improvements to our
community that have come with its steady growth. And I‘ve seen the unwelcome
consequences too. The proposed bridge across the Boardman River is an
unnecessary, damaging, and illogical consequence that we all should do
everything in our power to avoid. It will cut this magnificent valley in
half with a wall of earth higher than the cedars there now, ruin wetlands,
damage water quality, and bring nearly 30,000 cars and trucks a day.
People come to the Grand Traverse region in search of a way of life that is
truly unique in Michigan and the nation. The magnificent setting. The high
quality of life. Perhaps too few realize how rare and how fragile it is. How
the onrushing tide of our times, of building something bigger, better,
faster has swallowed up the natural countryside almost before we even
realize it is gone -- the plague of urban sprawl.
Sprawl follows roads, specifically big, new roads. As surely as spring
follows winter, sprawl follows roads. If you build it, they will come. The
traffic, the noise, the congestion, the billboards. Do you recall Joyce
Kilmore‘s poem? “I think that I shall never see a billboard as lovely as a
tree.“
The proposed Hartman-Hammond bridge is said by its supporters to be a
transportation solution for our rapid and ongoing area growth. Don‘t believe
it. This misguided proposal will not only fail to reduce congestion but in
the process will wreck the values that draw us here in the first place. The
destruction of vital wetlands and wildlife habitat, the inevitable urban
sprawl, is part of the price.
The proposed road and bridge across the Boardman is so unreasonable that 15
years ago 71 percent of Grand Traverse County voters rejected it in a
referendum. Four years ago the Michigan Land Use Institute and its partners
developed “Smart Roads: Grand Traverse Region,“ a less expensive, much less
damaging, and more effective alternative to solving traffic congestion. Last
year the city commission in Traverse City voted the road-and-bridge project
down. The road commission‘s failure to listen to publics concerns and
explore more effective, less destructive ideas is what lies at the heart of
the lawsuit.
So many citizens and organizations are working terribly hard in our region
to improve the quality of life while at the same time taking care to
minimize the damage to land and a rare small town way of life. They include
the partners in the coalition that filed the lawsuit -- the Coalition for
Sensible Growth, Northern Michigan Environmental Action Council, the local
affiliate and national Sierra Club, and All The Way to the Bay, a canoe
racers group.
Will we be remembered by our children and then their children for having
decided to build a highway through this area? Are we going to decide that
the river valley is the place we should urbanize so that we have urbanized
every last square inch of this region? Is that the legacy we‘re seeking to
leave behind?
Or do we want to be remembered for being people who at the beginning of a
new century advanced a different vision that says, yes, let‘s manage and
solve our problems but let‘s also protect some irreplaceable places forever.
Halting this bridge and bypass and securing a landscape and a way of life
that all of us cherish is the gift I want to give to the future. Surely you
do too.

Helen Milliken • TC

Towards a just peace

Reader Nancy Brimhall ( Letters 5/23) thinks that in my interview (“Two Peoples, One Land“, Express, 5/09 ) I “glossed over important historical facts“ regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To describe such a subject in an interview is daunting if you have an understanding of its complexity, which I think I do. I emphasized what I feel is most pertinent, trying to be as fair as possible, since I have no axe to grind.
Ms Brimhall makes four points, which I can‘t address within the 300 word limit for letters, but suffice it to say I think the lady is making debater‘s points which are questionable historically and irrelevent to the goal of bringing a just peace to that tormented land.
One final thought. If and when the small movement of peaceful, nonviolent resistance to the military occupation grows into a mass movement, including thousands of Jews, arabs and international peace activists, the end to the present nightmare will be on the horizon. Large
demonstrations and marches have begun to appear in both Israel and the Palestinian territories, but without the media attention they deserve. Peaceful resistance may bring a just solution while the never-ending cycle of violence demonstrably can not.

James McCormick • Traverse City

Doggone considerations

I am responding to Jim Carruther‘s letter (5-2-02) about the 2002 National Cherry Festival commemorative print. Please consider the following:
1. Tom Kern does not choose the winning print; a panel of art experts do.
2. Banning dogs from the Open Space is a safety measure for both people and animals.
3. The delightful print depicts the puppy in a cherry orchard, not among thousands of people in the hot and crowded open space. The puppy is much happier, and so are the people.
If everyone had the benefit of possessing good common sense, a lot of “rules“ in life would be unnecessary.

Judy LaCross • Cedar


 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close