Letters 10-24-2016

It’s Obama’s 1984 Several editions ago I concluded a short letter to the editor with an ominous rhetorical flourish: “Welcome to George Orwell’s 1984 and the grand opening of the Federal Department of Truth!” At the time I am sure most of the readers laughed off my comments as right-wing hyperbole. Shame on you for doubting me...

Gun Bans Don’t Work It is said that mass violence only happens in the USA. A lone gunman in a rubber boat, drifted ashore at a popular resort in Tunisia and randomly shot and killed 38 mostly British and Irish tourists. Tunisian gun laws, which are among the most restrictive in the world, didn’t stop this mass slaughter. And in January 2015, two armed men killed 11 and wounded 11 others in an attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. French gun laws didn’t stop these assassins...

Scripps’ Good Deed No good deed shall go unpunished! When Dan Scripps was the 101st District State Representative, he introduced legislation to prevent corporations from contaminating (e.g. fracking) or depleting (e.g. Nestle) Michigan’s water table for corporate profit. There are no property lines in the water table, and many of us depend on private wells for abundant, safe, clean water. In the subsequent election, Dan’s opponents ran a negative campaign almost solely on the misrepresentation that Dan’s good deed was a government takeover of your private water well...

Political Definitions As the time to vote draws near it’s a good time to check into what you stand for. According to Dictionary.com the meanings for liberal and conservative are as follows:

Liberal: Favorable to progress or reform as in political or religious affairs.

Conservative: Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditions and limit change...

Voting Takes A Month? Hurricane Matthew hit the Florida coast Oct. 6, over three weeks before Election Day. Bob Ross (Oct. 17th issue) posits that perhaps evacuation orders from Governor Scott may have had political motivations to diminish turnout and seems to praise Hillary Clinton’s call for Gov. Scott to extend Florida’s voter registration deadline due to evacuations...

Clinton Foundation Facts Does the Clinton Foundation really spend a mere 10 percent (per Mike Pence) or 20 percent (per Reince Priebus) of its money on charity? Not true. Charity Watch gives it an A rating (the same as it gives the NRA Foundation) and says it spends 88 percent on charitable causes, and 12 percent on overhead. Here is the source of the misunderstanding: The Foundation does give only a small percentage of its money to charitable organizations, but it spends far more money directly running a number of programs...

America Needs Change Trump supports our constitution, will appoint judges that will keep our freedoms safe. He supports the partial-birth ban; Hillary voted against it. Regardless of how you feel about Trump, critical issues are at stake. Trump will increase national security, monitor refugee admissions, endorse our vital military forces while fighting ISIS. Vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence will be an intelligent asset for the country. Hillary wants open borders, increased government regulation, and more demilitarization at a time when we need strong military defenses...

My Process For No I will be voting “no” on Prop 3 because I am supportive of the process that is in place to review and approve developments. I was on the Traverse City Planning Commission in the 1990s and gained an appreciation for all of the work that goes into a review. The staff reviews the project and makes a recommendation. The developer then makes a presentation, and fellow commissioners and the public can ask questions and make comments. By the end of the process, I knew how to vote for a project, up or down. This process then repeats itself at the City Commission...

Regarding Your Postcard If you received a “Vote No” postcard from StandUp TC, don’t believe their lies. Prop 3 is not illegal. It won’t cost city taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal bills or special elections. Prop 3 is about protecting our downtown -- not Munson, NMC or the Commons -- from a future of ugly skyscrapers that will diminish the very character of our downtown...

Vote Yes It has been suggested that a recall or re-election of current city staff and Traverse City Commission would work better than Prop 3. I disagree. A recall campaign is the most divisive, costly type of election possible. Prop 3, when passed, will allow all city residents an opportunity to vote on any proposed development over 60 feet tall at no cost to the taxpayer...

Yes Vote Explained A “yes” vote on Prop 3 will give Traverse City the right to vote on developments over 60 feet high. It doesn’t require votes on every future building, as incorrectly stated by a previous letter writer. If referendums are held during general elections, taxpayers pay nothing...

Beware Trump When the country you love have have served for 33 years is threatened, you have an obligation and a duty to speak out. Now is the time for all Americans to speak out against a possible Donald Trump presidency. During the past year Trump has been exposed as a pathological liar, a demagogue and a person who is totally unfit to assume the presidency of our already great country...

Picture Worth 1,000 Words Nobody disagrees with the need for affordable housing or that a certain level of density is dollar smart for TC. The issue is the proposed solution. If you haven’t already seen the architect’s rendition for the site, please Google “Pine Street Development Traverse City”...

Living Wage, Not Tall Buildings Our community deserves better than the StandUp TC “vote no” arguments. They are not truthful. Their yard signs say: “More Housing. Less Red Tape. Vote like you want your kids to live here.” The truth: More housing, but for whom? At what price..

Home · Articles · News · Features · A dispute at 18 miles an...
. . . .

A dispute at 18 miles an hour/Moving violation

Patrick Sullivan - June 13th, 2011
A Disputeat 18 Miles Per Hour; No one wins when it’s cyclists vs. motorists on the roads
By Patrick Sullivan
What should have been a peaceful, quick ride down Front Street in Traverse
City on a spring evening turned ugly last month when a motorist apparently
decided he didn’t want to drive behind someone riding a bicycle.
Joel Gaff, Jr. was riding in the right vehicle lane at around 18 miles per
hour when a car crept up behind him and the driver laid on the horn. The
31-year-old wasn’t in the bike lane, but he was riding as fast as the car
ahead of him, he said.
“I was traveling at the speed of traffic,” Gaff said. “Often I find it
safer to ride in the vehicle lane when you travel at 18 or 20 miles an
That’s because in the bike lane, car doors and pedestrians can pop in
front of riders without warning.
“As long as you’re not impeding the flow of traffic, it’s actually legal
to ride there, even if there is a bike lane,” he said.

The motorist behind Gaff apparently didn’t believe he had a right to be
After honking and waving for Gaff to pull over, the man pulled aside the
cyclist, as if to intimidate him.
“I can’t say for sure, but I can say with about 99 percent certainty that
he was trying to assert his position over me,” Gaff said.
First Gaff put his hand on the passenger side window as a defensive move
so he could push off if the car pulled closer. Finally Gaff said he felt
threatened and he pounded with his fist on the window several times.
“It wasn’t meant to be an offensive thing, it was meant to be a, ‘Hey,
you’re not doing what you’re supposed to be doing here, sir,’” he said.
Whatever Gaff’s intended message, things got more serious.
The driver pulled in front of him, blocking his position in the road, and
Gaff says the man sped up and slowed down several times, as if he was
trying to get Gaff to crash into the back of his car.

The driver stopped, got out and started hurling the f-word at Gaff, the
cyclist said, telling him he had no business on the road and that he was
angry because Gaff punched his car. Gaff unclipped one of his feet and he
said he attempted to talk to the man and stay reasonable.
The man was probably a little older than Gaff and a little bigger.
“I’m by no means a fighter of any sort; I’m not looking to pick a fight
with anybody,” Gaff said. “I’m a tall, skinny bike rider.”
The man shoved Gaff before he got back in his car and drove away, Gaff said.
Gaff, a road cyclist who clocks around 200 miles per week during the
summer, took down the license plate, called police and made a report.
He hasn’t heard back from the Traverse City Police Department about the
incident, which happened May 13. Given the seriousness of the encounter,
Gaff hopes police at least contacted the driver and took a statement.

There is bad behavior on the part of motorists. And there is bad behavior
on the part of cyclists. Seeing both viewpoints, Fred Schaafsma said a few
years ago he attempted to improve relations between the two sides.
“I saw it myself as a cyclist, I saw it myself as a motorist,” Schaafsma
Schaafsma, who lives on the Old Mission Peninsula, said he witnessed and
heard about bad behavior -- whether it was a cyclist who flipped a middle
finger because he thought someone drove too close or a driver who laid on
the horn because she got stuck behind a cyclist on a curve.
Schaafsma was able to convince members of the Cherry Capital Cycling Club
that something needed to be done.
The cycling club sent out a letter to around 600 Peninsula Township
residents who lived on roads popular with cyclists -- Bluff Road, East
Shore Road, and Peninsula Drive.
“We asked to get responses and do you know what? We learned a lot from
it,” Schaafsma said.
He said the responses were mostly constructive and that residents were
pleased the club was opening a dialogue.
“Only one response said cyclists don’t belong on the road,” he said. “One
person sent an email and said, ‘Oh, I just love all of these colorful
jerseys and seeing people have a wonderful time.’”
That was around 2007, and Schaafsma believes cyclist-motorists relations
have improved.
“I would tell you that, without having hard facts, it’s dramatically
better,” he said.

Rob Manigold, Peninsula Township supervisor, worked with Schaafsma and
also believes the initiative helped.
“Fred’s an avid cyclist and at the time our deputy was an avid cyclist,”
Manigold said, referring to the Grand Traverse Sheriff’s deputy assigned
to the township.
It may be time for a refresher course for cyclists and drivers, however.
“The complaints had died off significantly until just recently, and, I
hate to say that, but I’ve gotten two in just the last couple of weeks,”
Manigold said.
One was from a woman who complained that a cyclist had stopped to relieve
himself near her home. Another was about a dispute caused after two
cyclists blocked the road and a driver slowed to complain.
“I’m hearing it from people about the bicycles and then they say, ‘How can
I turn them in? They don’t have a license plate on them.’ ... but I think
it’s a minority doing it,” Manigold said.
Others see hostility focused in the opposite direction.
Jim Birch, a 69-year-old triathlete, said in recent years he’s been yelled
at on his bike, been the recipient of obscene gestures and has had cars
and trucks encroach dangerously upon his rear tire. Once, a couple of
years ago, a motor home crept up behind him and someone told him, through
a P.A. system, to get off the road.
“The bottom line is there’s room for all of us, and if we just show common
courtesy we shouldn’t have any problems,” Birch said. “It’s going to ruin
everyone’s day if you hit a biker.”

In recent years cycling club members have been paying more attention to
serious crashes where the motorist is found to be at fault.
Three years ago, a cyclist from Williamsburg was killed in a crash in
Kalkaska County.
Schaafsma got involved within a day or so when he saw a newspaper article
and believed the road death did not get the attention it deserved.
The cyclist, Carl Ray, was riding on the paved shoulder of Rapid City Road
when a driver left the roadway and stuck and killed Ray at around 8 p.m.
on a July evening.
“What happened was, nobody said much of anything. I said. ‘Hey, wait a
minute, this is a big deal,’” he said. “Most people are like, ‘Somebody
got killed on a bicycle, so what?’”
Schaafsma stayed on top of the Kalkaska County Sheriff’s Department and
then-Sheriff William Artress to make sure charges were brought against
Stephen Michael Ciarkowski, the 52-year-old who was eventually held
responsible for Ray’s death.
He wrote letters to the prosecutor, Brian Donnelly, and to the circuit
court judge, Janet Allen.
He let everyone know the case was being watched closely.
Michael Dettmer, a cycle club member and former United States Attorney for
the Western District of Michigan, said this kind of outside advocacy
should get the attention of local officials.
“I think there’s a presumption that the cyclist is a second-class
citizen,” Dettmer said. “That’s why we’re attempting to do that, when
there’s a meritorious case.”

Ciarkowski was convicted of negligent homicide and acquitted on a charge
of operating under the influence of drugs causing death, the more serious
charge. He tested positive for methamphetamine use after the crash.
He was sentenced to 14 months to two years in prison and is currently on
probation in Antrim County.
Schaafsma is frustrated Ciarkowski was not convicted of the more serious
charge, a charge with a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.
“If it’s an illegal drug and it’s in your system, then it seems to me
that’s a violation. He left the roadway. That was established,” he said.
Schaafsma blames the acquittal on the lack of a standard in Michigan for
levels of methamphetine in a person’s blood to establish intoxication.
“I wasn’t satisfied that the process worked there, I think that motorist
got a pretty good deal there at the end of the day,” Dettmer said.
In addition to harsher punishment for motorists responsible for the death
of a bicyclist, Dettmer believes cyclists themselves can make the roads
safer if they create goodwill through their own behavior.
“I think any bicyclist that’s out there really needs to follow the law,”
Dettmer said. “That’s important to me, that we all try to follow the rules
of the road.”

Sometimes cyclists are the worst ambassadors for cycling.
Take this year’s Zoo-de-Mack ride from Boyne Highlands to Mackinaw City, a
leisurely organized ride that bills itself as a huge party.
Emmet County Sheriff Peter Wallin said this year the event prompted eight
calls to his department and more to the state police.
Wallin says the problem might be that riders start out in a concentrated
“Generally, most bicyclists do follow the rules of the road, but when you
get 3,500 or more it tends to get out of hand a little bit, and those are
the ones that generally give bicyclists a black eye,” Wallin said.
In the past two years at the Zoo-de-Mac, cyclists have failed to get out
of the way when ambulances needed to pass to catch up to injured riders,
Wallin said.
“We’ve given bicyclists tickets before. Have we done it in the Zoo-de-Mac
before? No, we try to work with them,” Wallin said. “We’re going to have a
sit-down with the promoters and try to work this out, I mean, we want
everyone to have fun, believe me, but we believe in safety, too.”
Nonetheless, throughout the summer, on M-119 between Harbor Springs and
Cross Village, a stretch referred to as the “tunnel of trees,” there is
relative harmony between cyclists and motorists along the popular route,
Wallin said, at least based on the number of complaints.

  Evidence of the hostility some drivers feel for cyclists is not hard to
find, however.
Comments left on the website for the Petoskey News-Review under a story
about cyclists misbehaving during this year’s Zoo-de-Mack were lined up
squarely against the cyclists, with one commenter seeming to advocate
violence against bike riders.
“I didn’t know primates could ride bikes,” one commenter wrote, “...they
don’t want to have to buy insurance in spite of causing accidents, and
they don’t want to be ticketed.”
Another commenter said: “When bikes are on the road, they can cause
problems. Not all of them, but way too many of them. They crowd the roads
like they have more rights than the Almighty Himself. Then when they get
hit, they are always pointing their fingers at the motorist. Sorry
bicyclist, it just doesn’t work.”
One commenter took an extreme position: “They have a brush guard on those
big SUV’s right? Use them.”

Moving Violation
Man cries foul over cycling ticket
By Patrick Sullivan

Even many people who ride bikes believe cyclists, when they disobey the
rules, should get ticketed more often by police.
Jon Butler believes that, in general.
Butler disagrees, however, with the ticket he received Memorial Day from a
Traverse City Police officer as he rode with three friends on Union Street
in TC.
Butler was headed south at around 8:30 p.m. He said he and his girlfriend
and another couple were riding in a scattered pattern, two abreast, when
three or four cars backed up behind them near State Street.
In order to avoid doors opening from parked cars, they rode as far out
into the street as the right wheel track that vehicles would follow,
Butler said.
Butler said he sensed the woman who was driving the car nearest the group
was growing frustrated.
“She was getting really close to the person who was in the back of the
group and revving her motor,” Butler said.
The cars eventually got around.
At around 10th Street, however, a Traverse City Police cruiser rolled up
behind the group. The officer sounded his siren to make the first two
riders move over, Butler said. About 60 feet up the road, the officer
sounded the siren again, this time at Butler and his girlfriend.
Butler said he was frustrated, and as the officer drove past, he threw his
arms in the air.
“I was like, what’s the problem, you know, and he pulled right over,”
Butler said. “He goes, ‘Gimme your I.D.,’ and he goes back to the car and
he writes me up.”
The officer, Joseph Soffredine, wrote Butler a ticket for impeding traffic.
According to the ticket, Butler was cited for riding in the middle of the
road, not moving for traffic, and causing traffic to go left of the center

Butler plans to fight the ticket in front of a magistrate.
He doesn’t believe he could have safely ridden any closer to the curb.
A booklet about cycling published by the League of Michigan Bicyclists
recommends cyclists ride in the right wheel track of vehicles.
“I ride year-round, I’ve been riding for years and I’ve never had an
issue like this before,” Butler said. “I actually rebuild old bikes and
collect bikes, so it’s not like I’m an amateur cyclist here. I know
what’s going on.”
Curtiss Gulash, Butler’s friend, witnessed the encounter.
He thinks Butler got a ticket because he argued with the officer about
cycling law.
“My opinion was that he didn’t like that Jon was being a little defiant,”
Gulash said. “It really surprised me, because Traverse is touted as this
bike-friendly community, and that’s part of the reason why my wife and I
fell in love with Traverse City.”

Traverse City Police Capt. Stephen Morgan said he doesn’t know what
prompted Soffredine to write the ticket, but he said police have
discretion when determining whether a cyclist is impeding traffic.
“I think you have to look at the totality of the circumstances going on,”
Morgan said.
Morgan said there are probably a lot of cyclists that get away with
violations in Traverse City and don’t receive tickets.
For his part, Butler agrees.
“I agree with that cop, there’s a lot of cyclists that probably should be
ticketed, I see it all the time,” Butler said.
Morgan and Butler disagree about Butler’s ticket, however.
Morgan said state law is pretty clear. It prohibits cyclists from blocking
On impeding traffic, the law says a “person ... shall not block,
obstruct, impede, or otherwise interfere with the normal flow of vehicular
or pedestrian traffic upon a public street or highway.”
Another law says cyclists traveling slower than the speed of traffic on
roads “shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge
of the roadway,” except in a few circumstances, such as when the far right
side of the road is unsafe.
Another law says cyclists may not ride more than two abreast, a law that
would seem to sanction riding two abreast and contradict the law about
riding as close as possible to the right side of the road.

Grand Traverse Prosecutor Alan Schneider, speaking not about the facts of
the Butler ticket but about Michigan cycling law in general, said he
believes the law is contradictory.
Simultaneous laws that both require cyclist to ride as close as safely
possible to the right and then spell out that it’s OK to ride two abreast
cause confusion, said Schneider, himself a road cyclist.
In general, to avoid trouble, cyclists should remember they need to follow
traffic laws just like cars.
“Bicyclists themselves have a misunderstanding, they follow many of the
same rules that motorists do, but not all of them,” Schneider said.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5